NNSA Sets Spring 2014 as Target For Plutonium-Disposition Decision

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 9, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON – The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion has made spring of 2014 the tar­get for com­plet­ing an as­sess­ment of its op­tions for dis­pos­ing sur­plus weapons-grade plutoni­um — a move ob­serv­ers say sug­gests the con­struc­tion slow­down at the agency’s con­tro­ver­sial re­pro­cessing fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina could last an­oth­er year.

The agency an­nounced the con­struc­tion slow­down of the mixed-ox­ide fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity at its Sa­van­nah River site in April 2013, as part of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s rol­lout of its fisc­al 2014 budget pro­pos­al. The fa­cil­ity is meant to dis­pose of weapons-grade ma­ter­i­als by con­vert­ing them in­to fuel for power plants, but a series of delays and cost over­runs as­so­ci­ated with the pro­ject promp­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion to re­con­sider wheth­er there are more ef­fi­cient dis­pos­al op­tions.

Anne Har­ring­ton, deputy NNSA ad­min­is­trat­or for de­fense nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire in Au­gust that the agency would not re­lease an an­ti­cip­ated sup­ple­ment­al en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment re­gard­ing plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion un­til after it com­pleted the as­sess­ment of its op­tions. At the time, however, Har­ring­ton did not in­dic­ate how long that pro­cess would take. The en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment had pre­vi­ously been sched­ule for re­lease earli­er this year.

A no­tice the agency made pub­lic Oct. 4 ex­tends the con­tract for work on the doc­u­ment un­til Septem­ber 2014. The no­tice, dated Sept. 5, 2013, says the new tar­get date for is­su­ing the fi­nal en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment is April 30, 2013. NNSA con­tract­ing of­ficer Ariane Kam­in­sky told GSN on Wed­nes­day that this was due to a ty­po­graph­ic­al er­ror, and that the real tar­get was to be April 30, 2014. Kam­in­sky said the agency was work­ing to re­vise the no­tice, but de­clined to an­swer ques­tions re­gard­ing wheth­er there would be oth­er changes to the doc­u­ment.

The no­tice cites the on­go­ing as­sess­ment of plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion op­tions as a reas­on for the delay in is­su­ing the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment. It says the com­pleted as­sess­ment is not due un­til mid-fisc­al 2014, or spring of the cal­en­dar year.

Tom Cle­m­ents, of the watch­dog group Friends of the Earth, said the new sched­ule sug­gests the ad­min­is­tra­tion might not an­nounce a de­cision on how to move for­ward with plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion un­til after it rolls out its fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al. Cle­m­ents, a long-time op­pon­ent of the MOX pro­ject, noted the ad­min­is­tra­tion typ­ic­ally re­leases its budget in late winter or early spring. When it re­leased the fisc­al 2014 pro­pos­al in early April of this year, it was con­sidered un­usu­ally late.

If in fact the ad­min­is­tra­tion re­leases its fisc­al 2015 budget pro­pos­al be­fore the plutoni­um-dis­pos­i­tion as­sess­ment, the budget pro­pos­al would likely in­clude re­duced fund­ing levels for the MOX pro­ject sim­il­ar to the fisc­al 2014 pro­pos­al, Cle­m­ents said. As a res­ult of the new as­sess­ment of op­tions and the con­struc­tion slow­down, the fisc­al 2014 budget called for spend­ing $200 mil­lion less than the pri­or year.

Spokespeople for the ad­min­is­tra­tion and Shaw Areva MOX ser­vices, the com­pany do­ing the con­struc­tion work, could not be reached for com­ment by press time.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login