Administration Revises Timeline for Plutonium Disposition Review

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 11, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion is back­ing away from state­ments it made earli­er this month in­dic­at­ing that an as­sess­ment of its op­tions for dis­pos­ing sur­plus weapons-grade plutoni­um would not be com­plete un­til the spring of 2014 — a date ob­serv­ers said could have caused fur­ther con­struc­tion delays at a con­tro­ver­sial re­pro­cessing fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina.

Con­struc­tion of the mixed-ox­ide fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity has been slowed since the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion an­nounced in April that it was re­as­sess­ing its op­tions for dis­pos­ing of the plutoni­um. The MOX fa­cil­ity would con­vert the ma­ter­i­al in­to fuel for nuc­le­ar power plants, but a series of delays and cost over­runs promp­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion to study wheth­er there are more ef­fi­cient op­tions.

A con­tract­ing no­tice the agency made pub­lic on Oct. 4 said it ex­pec­ted the as­sess­ment to be fin­ished in mid-fisc­al 2014, or spring of the cal­en­dar year. Such tim­ing could have meant fund­ing cuts for MOX con­struc­tion would re­main in place an ad­di­tion­al year, giv­en that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s an­nu­al budget pro­pos­al typ­ic­ally is re­leased earli­er in the year, Tom Cle­m­ents, of the watch­dog group Friends of the Earth told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

However, the ad­min­is­tra­tion on Thursday re­leased a re­vised ver­sion of the no­tice that omits any in­form­a­tion per­tain­ing to when the as­sess­ment will be fin­ished. An En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial told GSN Fri­day that the pri­or state­ment sug­gest­ing the re­view would not be com­plete un­til mid-fisc­al 2014 was made in er­ror. The of­fi­cial, who was not au­thor­ized to dis­cuss the is­sue and asked not to be named, said the as­sess­ment would likely be com­pleted soon­er, pos­sibly be­fore the end of 2013.

Like the earli­er ver­sion, the re­vised no­tice an­nounces the ex­ten­sion of a con­tract to do work on a sup­ple­ment­al en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment for plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion which ori­gin­ally had been sched­uled for re­lease earli­er this year. Anne Har­ring­ton, deputy NNSA ad­min­is­trat­or for de­fense nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, told GSN in Au­gust that the agency would not re­lease the en­vir­on­ment­al doc­u­ment un­til after it com­pleted the as­sess­ment of dis­pos­al op­tions.

Sim­il­arly, the earli­er ver­sion of the con­tract no­tice re­leased Oct. 4 cited the on­go­ing re­view as one reas­on why work on the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment would con­tin­ue in­to 2014. However, the re­vi­sion is­sued Thursday says the con­tract ex­ten­sion “is not as­so­ci­ated with the De­part­ment’s as­sess­ment of al­tern­at­ive plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion strategies.”

Ac­cord­ing to the un­named En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial, this lan­guage in the re­vised no­tice is not meant to con­tra­dict Har­ring­ton’s pri­or state­ment. The source ac­know­ledged that the two items are re­lated in the sense that, if the on­go­ing as­sess­ment causes the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pre­ferred op­tion for plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion to change, the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment would have to re­flect that change.

The lan­guage in the re­vised no­tice is in­stead meant to in­dic­ate that the con­tract ex­ten­sion it­self is not dir­ectly de­pend­ent on the as­sess­ment of op­tions, the En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial said.

The no­tice ex­tends the con­tract for work re­lated to the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment un­til Novem­ber 2014. The state­ment it­self is ex­pec­ted by April 2014, ac­cord­ing to the re­vised no­tice.

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login