Administration Revises Timeline for Plutonium Disposition Review

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Oct. 11, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion is back­ing away from state­ments it made earli­er this month in­dic­at­ing that an as­sess­ment of its op­tions for dis­pos­ing sur­plus weapons-grade plutoni­um would not be com­plete un­til the spring of 2014 — a date ob­serv­ers said could have caused fur­ther con­struc­tion delays at a con­tro­ver­sial re­pro­cessing fa­cil­ity in South Car­o­lina.

Con­struc­tion of the mixed-ox­ide fuel fab­ric­a­tion fa­cil­ity has been slowed since the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion an­nounced in April that it was re­as­sess­ing its op­tions for dis­pos­ing of the plutoni­um. The MOX fa­cil­ity would con­vert the ma­ter­i­al in­to fuel for nuc­le­ar power plants, but a series of delays and cost over­runs promp­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion to study wheth­er there are more ef­fi­cient op­tions.

A con­tract­ing no­tice the agency made pub­lic on Oct. 4 said it ex­pec­ted the as­sess­ment to be fin­ished in mid-fisc­al 2014, or spring of the cal­en­dar year. Such tim­ing could have meant fund­ing cuts for MOX con­struc­tion would re­main in place an ad­di­tion­al year, giv­en that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s an­nu­al budget pro­pos­al typ­ic­ally is re­leased earli­er in the year, Tom Cle­m­ents, of the watch­dog group Friends of the Earth told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

However, the ad­min­is­tra­tion on Thursday re­leased a re­vised ver­sion of the no­tice that omits any in­form­a­tion per­tain­ing to when the as­sess­ment will be fin­ished. An En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial told GSN Fri­day that the pri­or state­ment sug­gest­ing the re­view would not be com­plete un­til mid-fisc­al 2014 was made in er­ror. The of­fi­cial, who was not au­thor­ized to dis­cuss the is­sue and asked not to be named, said the as­sess­ment would likely be com­pleted soon­er, pos­sibly be­fore the end of 2013.

Like the earli­er ver­sion, the re­vised no­tice an­nounces the ex­ten­sion of a con­tract to do work on a sup­ple­ment­al en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment for plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion which ori­gin­ally had been sched­uled for re­lease earli­er this year. Anne Har­ring­ton, deputy NNSA ad­min­is­trat­or for de­fense nuc­le­ar non­pro­lif­er­a­tion, told GSN in Au­gust that the agency would not re­lease the en­vir­on­ment­al doc­u­ment un­til after it com­pleted the as­sess­ment of dis­pos­al op­tions.

Sim­il­arly, the earli­er ver­sion of the con­tract no­tice re­leased Oct. 4 cited the on­go­ing re­view as one reas­on why work on the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment would con­tin­ue in­to 2014. However, the re­vi­sion is­sued Thursday says the con­tract ex­ten­sion “is not as­so­ci­ated with the De­part­ment’s as­sess­ment of al­tern­at­ive plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion strategies.”

Ac­cord­ing to the un­named En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial, this lan­guage in the re­vised no­tice is not meant to con­tra­dict Har­ring­ton’s pri­or state­ment. The source ac­know­ledged that the two items are re­lated in the sense that, if the on­go­ing as­sess­ment causes the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pre­ferred op­tion for plutoni­um dis­pos­i­tion to change, the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment would have to re­flect that change.

The lan­guage in the re­vised no­tice is in­stead meant to in­dic­ate that the con­tract ex­ten­sion it­self is not dir­ectly de­pend­ent on the as­sess­ment of op­tions, the En­ergy De­part­ment of­fi­cial said.

The no­tice ex­tends the con­tract for work re­lated to the en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ment un­til Novem­ber 2014. The state­ment it­self is ex­pec­ted by April 2014, ac­cord­ing to the re­vised no­tice.

What We're Following See More »
23 MILLION FEWER INSURED IN 2026
Congressional Budget Office Scores House Trumpcare Bill
39 minutes ago
BREAKING

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.

Source:
GOP DISCORD
Graham Rejects Trump’s Budget In Hearing
39 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.

Source:
PREFERS “CLEAN” BILL
Mnuchin Looks To Avoid Debt Ceiling Fight
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS
“THAT’S THE GOAL”
McConnell Not Sure How To Get 50 Votes For Health Care
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Wednesday that he doesn't yet know the formula towards gaining passage of an Obamacare replacement in the Senate. "I don't know how we get to 50 (votes) at the moment. But that's the goal," McConnell said. The House passed an Obamacare replacement bill which has been widely seen as dead on arrival in the Senate, and McConnell has put together a working group of Republican Senators working towards creating health care legislation which could gain the support of at least 50 Senators.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login