The federal shutdown has put the District of Columbia in the familiar position of political prop. This time, however, city leaders won’t sit for it.
“It’s a new attitude in D.C.,” councilmember David Grosso told National Journal at an event hosted by the voting-rights advocacy group DC Vote earlier this week. “We’re no longer going to ask for permission. We’re going to stand up for our rights and spend our local money.”
The problem is that even while the city runs its own municipal government, it’s the only jurisdiction in the United States whose budget and revenues are controlled by Congress. For the past two weeks, the city has gotten by by tapping an emergency reserve, but those funds will run dry as early as Tuesday of next week, leaving city services such as schools, police, and trash collection in the lurch.
Republicans have used D.C.’s appropriations as a political wedge issue, voting to allow the city to spend its own funds after Democrats opposed any piecemeal bills to restore funding to the government. The mayor has sought to negotiate with congressional leaders, and even took a more aggressive approach Wednesday, confronting Senate Majority Harry Reid on the steps of the Capitol.
But Grosso says D.C. should not be asking for permission to spend its own money anymore, a move that would violate the federal Antideficiency Act. He put D.C.’s fight for autonomy in a historical context. “The biggest most violent debates we’ve had in this country are separation of state and federal powers,” he said. “That’s been debated even prior to the birth of this country.”
Mayor Vincent Gray dismissed Grosso’s approach in an address Thursday night, arguing that violating the Antideficiency Act undermines D.C.’s moral authority in negotiations with Congress. He also said such a move could make District underlings vulnerable. “Anyone who has a role in obligating the District to pay funds or disbursing those funds—people who let contracts, or accountants, or payroll officers—could potentially be at risk of conviction for a federal felony that carries a maximum of two years in federal prison and a $5,000 fine,” the mayor said Thursday. Gray added that while he has “no problem taking these legal risks myself,” he’s not comfortable putting his employees in legal jeopardy.
Grosso isn’t buying it. “When you stand up for yourself and you stand up for what’s right no matter what, you have greater moral authority,” he said in a follow-up interview Friday. “I don’t think it’s a very hard choice there,” Grosso said. “I’m willing to break that law.”
So far his position has won the support of half a dozen or so D.C. councilmembers, including David Catania, Anita Bonds, Kenyan McDuffie, Mary Cheh, and Tommy Wells.
“Who would they send to arrest us?” Grosso continued. “The Capitol Hill police? Who would arrest the people of the District of Columbia for spending their own money? I can’t figure it out.”
Correction: an earlier version of this story misspelled a councilmember’s name.
What We're Following See More »
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."