Obamacare May Be More Political Than You Think

The health care law could help millions of people register to vote.

Anti-Obamacare protesters wear masks of U.S. President Barack Obama and Grim Reaper as they demonstrate in front of the U.S. Supreme Court June 28, 2012 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Oct. 14, 2013, 4:52 p.m.

As mem­bers of Con­gress con­tin­ue to ar­gue over the Af­ford­able Care Act, one im­pact of the law on par­tis­an polit­ics has largely been left out of the con­ver­sa­tion: voter re­gis­tra­tion.

The Na­tion­al Voter Re­gis­tra­tion Act of 1993, also known as the “Mo­tor Voter” law, re­quires gov­ern­ment agen­cies to of­fer in­di­vidu­als the op­por­tun­ity to vote — and that in­cludes the newly opened Obama­care ex­changes.

That gives some Re­pub­lic­ans one more reas­on to op­pose the law. If low-in­come ap­plic­ants lean Demo­crat­ic, the ar­gu­ment goes, the ex­changes could boost the party’s voter rolls.

“The prac­tice raises long­stand­ing sus­pi­cions on the right that the ACA ex­changes are de­signed for polit­ic­al as well as reg­u­lat­ory pur­poses,” said Tim Miller, a seni­or fel­low at the Amer­ic­an En­ter­prise In­sti­tute.

Con­ser­vat­ive talk show host Rush Limbaugh has been char­ac­ter­ist­ic­ally blunt on the sub­ject. “The pur­pose of Obama­care got noth­ing to do with your health, and noth­ing to do with your in­sur­ance,” he said. “It’s about build­ing a per­man­ent, un­defeat­able, al­ways-fun­ded Demo­crat ma­jor­ity.”

In Wash­ing­ton, Rep. Charles Bous­tany, R-La., sent a let­ter to Health and Hu­man Ser­vices Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us in March, ex­press­ing con­cerns about the link­ing of ACA in­sur­ance ap­plic­a­tions to voter re­gis­tra­tion.

“While the health care law re­quires that gov­ern­ment agen­cies col­lect vast in­form­a­tion about Amer­ic­ans’ per­son­al lives, it does not give your De­part­ment an in­terest in wheth­er in­di­vidu­al Amer­ic­ans choose to vote,” he wrote.

Bous­tany’s of­fice did not re­spond to re­quests for com­ment.

Yet voter-rights ad­voc­ates main­tain that voter re­gis­tra­tion is not a par­tis­an is­sue. “Those new voters could be up for grabs by all parties,” said Laura Murphy, dir­ect­or of the Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on’s Wash­ing­ton le­gis­lat­ive of­fice. “I think it’s very un­reas­on­able to as­sume someone vot­ing for the first time is ne­ces­sar­ily go­ing to be vot­ing one way or the oth­er.”

Ac­cord­ing to the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices, voter re­gis­tra­tion must be offered on the ACA ex­change ap­plic­a­tion be­cause of the Medi­caid eli­gib­il­ity de­term­in­a­tion. To be in com­pli­ance, CMS says they are in­clud­ing lan­guage on the pa­per and on­line ap­plic­a­tions that says, “If you want to re­gister to vote, you can com­plete a voter re­gis­tra­tion form at usa.gov.” States that have op­ted to cre­ate their own ex­changes are able to de­vel­op their own ap­plic­a­tions and choose how they en­force the Na­tion­al Voter Re­gis­tra­tion Act re­quire­ment.

Cali­for­nia was the first state to de­cide to en­force voter re­gis­tra­tion re­quire­ments through the ACA. “Nearly 5.8 mil­lion Cali­for­ni­ans who are oth­er­wise eli­gible to vote are not cur­rently re­gistered,” said Demo­crat­ic state Sen. Alex Pa­dilla, who au­thored the bill en­for­cing voter re­gis­tra­tion. “Covered Cali­for­nia [the state’s ex­change] provides a unique op­por­tun­ity to re­duce the num­ber of un­re­gistered Cali­for­ni­ans and in­crease par­ti­cip­a­tion.”

Five oth­er states have also pub­licly an­nounced their in­ten­tion to en­force the Na­tion­al Voter Re­gis­tra­tion Act: Con­necti­c­ut, Mary­land, New York, Rhode Is­land, and Ver­mont, ac­cord­ing to Eu­nice Rho, ad­vocacy and policy coun­sel for ACLU. The six states are solidly blue, but Rho says that di­vide began with the broad­er de­cision of wheth­er to es­tab­lish a state-based ex­change. States that op­ted to cre­ate their own tend to lean Demo­crat­ic.

However, Rho main­tains that the voter-re­gis­tra­tion ele­ment is a non­par­tis­an is­sue. “We should all agree that voters should be giv­en the op­por­tun­ity to par­ti­cip­ate in the polit­ic­al pro­cess,” she said. “Why not get at voters when they’re ac­cess­ing the sys­tem in large num­bers?”

Suc­cess­fully im­ple­ment­ing voter-re­gis­tra­tion re­quire­ments in­to the ACA ex­changes could give up to 68 mil­lion ad­di­tion­al eli­gible voters the chance to re­gister, ac­cord­ing to Demos, a left-lean­ing policy or­gan­iz­a­tion.

Over­all, more than 250 mil­lion people have re­gistered to vote through the Na­tion­al Voter Re­gis­tra­tion Act between 1995, when the law went in­to ef­fect, and 2010, Demos re­ports. To put that in per­spect­ive, an es­tim­ated 126 mil­lion people voted in the 2012 elec­tion, ac­cord­ing to the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter.

“It’s a really sig­ni­fic­ant op­por­tun­ity to ex­pand vot­ing re­gis­tra­tion,” Rho said, not­ing that about one-third of un­in­sured in­di­vidu­als are not re­gistered to vote.

Said Murphy: “One thing we all should be in fa­vor of — wheth­er Demo­crat, Re­pub­lic­an or in­de­pend­ent — is we should make vot­ing more ac­cess­ible, not less.”

What We're Following See More »
MAN WHO SHOT RONALD REAGAN
John Hinckley Jr. Granted Release
6 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

Thirty-five years after he tried to kill President Reagan, John Hinckley Jr. has been freed. "A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has granted a request for Hinckley to leave the mental hospital where he's lived for decades, to go live full-time with his elderly mother in Williamsburg, VA. The release could happen as early as next week, the judge ruled. Under the terms of his order, Hinckley is not allowed to contact his victims, their relatives or actress Jodie Foster, with whom he was obsessed. Hinckley also will not be permitted to 'knowingly travel' to areas where the current president or members or Congress are present. The judge said Hinckley could be allowed to live on his own or in a group home after one year.

Source:
SHARES THEIR LOVE STORY
Bill Clinton Gets Personal in Convention Speech
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“In the spring of 1971, I met a girl,” started Bill Clinton. In his speech Tuesday night at the Democratic National Convention, Clinton brought a personal touch, telling parallel stories of his relationship with Hillary Clinton and the work she has done throughout her career. He lauded the Democratic nominee for her career of work, touching on her earliest days of advocacy for children and those with disabilities while in law school, her role as Secretary of State, and her work in raising their daughter, Chelsea. Providing a number of anecdotes throughout the speech, Clinton built to a crescendo, imploring the audience to support his wife for president. "You should elect her, she'll never quit when the going gets tough," he said. "Your children and grandchildren will be grateful."

LOUD “BLACK LIVES MATTER” CHANTS RING OUT
Mothers Of The Movement Endorse Hillary Clinton
12 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A coalition of mothers whose children lost their lives in high profile cases across the country, known as the Mothers Of The Movement, were greeted with deafening chants of "Black Lives Matter" before telling their stories. The mothers of Sandra Bland, Jordan Davis, and Trayvon Martin spoke for the group, soliciting both tears and applause from the crowd. "Hillary Clinton has the compassion and understanding to comfort a grieving mother," said Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin. "And that's why, in the memory of our children, we are imploring you — all of you — to vote this election day."

SOUTH DAKOTA GIVES HER CLINCHING DELEGATES
Clinton Officially Democratic Nominee for President
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

With the South Dakota delegation announcing its delegate count, Hillary Rodham Clinton is officially the Democratic nominee for president, surpassing the 2383 delegates needed to clinch the nomination. Clinton is expected to speak at the convention on Thursday night and officially accept the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many People Protested in Philly Yesterday?
18 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 5,500, according to official estimates. "The Monday figures marked a large increase from the protests at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, where even the largest protests only drew a couple of hundred demonstrators. But it’s a far cry from the 35,000 to 50,000 that Philadelphia city officials initially expected."

Source:
×