Shutting Down the Government Over Obamacare Is the New Obamacare

In 2010, Democrats ran from the health care law. This year, it’s Republicans’ turn to distance themselves from their party’s defund-or-shutdown strategy.

Omayra Hernadez holds a sign reading, 'Hey Congress Do Your Job' as she and others gather in front of the office of Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) to protest against the partial government shutdown on October 15, 2013 in Doral, Florida. In Washington, DC Congress and the White House continue to work on a budget deal to get the government fully operational.
National Journal
Alex Seitz Wald
Add to Briefcase
Alex Seitz-Wald
Oct. 16, 2013, 10:05 a.m.

On the cam­paign trail back in 2010, Demo­crats from battle­ground dis­tricts and states twis­ted them­selves in­to rhet­or­ic­al knots to try to dis­tance them­selves from Obama­care, an un­pop­u­lar law that Re­pub­lic­ans would use as a raft to ride in­to the ma­jor­ity in Novem­ber. “It’s ba­sic­ally been ra­dio — and tele­vi­sion — si­lence. Even as Re­pub­lic­ans have at­tacked Demo­crats on the bill, Demo­crats haven’t seen fit to fight back — pre­fer­ring to change the sub­ject,” The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Chris Cil­lizza wrote at the time.

Rep. Jim Costa, D-Cal­if., who barely hung onto his seat that year, voted for the Af­ford­able Care Act, but later said he would have pre­ferred a more “in­cre­ment­al” ap­proach to health care re­form. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., made a full flip-flop, go­ing from “I’d be for it” to “I would not have sup­por­ted that.” Mean­while, Blue Dogs like former Rep. Heath Shuler, D-N.C., touted their vote against the law and hoped it would in­su­late them from party back­lash.

Spoil­er alert: It didn’t work. Demo­crats lost 63 seats and the Blue Dogs were nearly wiped out.

Now, some Re­pub­lic­ans are fa­cing the in­verse prob­lem. While the more ideo­lo­gic­al wing of the party forced a con­front­a­tion over Obama­care that led to the first gov­ern­ment shut­down in 17 years, GOP can­did­ates in more com­pet­it­ive dis­tricts want noth­ing to do with it, even as they feel pres­sured from the right to avoid dis­own­ing the Ted Cruz wing all to­geth­er. So they’re opt­ing for a duck-and-cov­er ap­proach in­stead.

It’s hap­pen­ing in south­ern Ari­zona, where Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate Martha Mc­Sally “wouldn’t take a stand [on the shut­down] des­pite mul­tiple re­quests for her po­s­i­tion from The Re­pub­lic, Ari­zona Daily Star, Green Val­ley News/Sahuar­ita Sun and KVOI-AM (1030),” as the Ari­zona Re­pub­lic re­por­ted this month. “She would say only that the shut­down is ‘a fail­ure of lead­er­ship,’ ” the pa­per’s Re­bekah Sanders ad­ded.

In New Hamp­shire’s 1st Dis­trict, Re­pub­lic­an Dan In­nis, who is primary­ing two-term Rep. Frank Guinta, wouldn’t say if he would have sup­por­ted the GOP’s ef­fort to de­fund Obama­care by link­ing it to a gov­ern­ment shut­down fight. “Obama­care is a dis­astrous, big-gov­ern­ment takeover of the health care sys­tem. While I sup­port re­peal­ing Obama­care, I think we’ve got to be real­ist­ic,” he told the AP.

In up­state New York, Re­pub­lic­an con­gres­sion­al can­did­ate Elise Stefanik used her first policy state­ment of the cam­paign to cri­ti­cize in­cum­bent Demo­crat­ic Rep. Bill Owens for vot­ing against the series of Re­pub­lic­an bills to fund cer­tain parts of the gov­ern­ment while leav­ing the rest closed. “But she re­peatedly would not say wheth­er she would have voted for the same four bills, if she was in Con­gress,” the Glens Falls Post-Star re­por­ted.

And across the coun­try in Cali­for­nia, Re­pub­lic­an chal­lenger Bri­an Nest­ande be­moaned the fisc­al fight in Wash­ing­ton, but “de­clined to say if he would have joined Re­pub­lic­ans who lob­bied House Speak­er John Boehner to take a hard line on Obama­care,” ac­cord­ing to the River­side Press En­ter­prise.

Mean­while, in the biggest race of the year, Vir­gin­ia gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Ken Cuc­cinelli has been feel­ing the heat. He said he’s “very dis­ap­poin­ted” with “both parties in Con­gress,” adding that a shut­down is “an un­ac­cept­able out­come for Vir­gin­ia.”

There’s no doubt the shut­down has been harm­ful to the GOP brand, with the party’s dis­ap­prov­al rat­ings shoot­ing up 9 points since the shut­down, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll, and it seems the party’s can­did­ates are wor­ried that the dam­age will ex­tend bey­ond Re­pub­lic­ans already in Con­gress. It’s still way too early to say how much the shut­down will im­pact the 2014 elec­tion, but it seems it’s already creep­ing in.

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
19 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login