A New Era of Congressional Civility? Don’t Bet on It

U.S. House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks to members of the press during a news conference September 12, 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Pelosi held the news conference to discuss House Democratic agendas.
National Journal
Billy House
See more stories about...
Billy House
Oct. 17, 2013, 4 p.m.

As the gov­ern­ment and Con­gress re­opened for busi­ness Thursday, many law­makers were back in their dis­tricts for their first week­end break after the end of the 16-day gov­ern­ment shut­down and debt-ceil­ing crisis.

Sen. An­gus King, I-Maine, had said on the Sen­ate floor that he hoped his­tory would judge this week’s bi­par­tis­an deal to end the stan­doffs as “the be­gin­ning of a new era of co­oper­a­tion and ci­vil­ity and prob­lem-solv­ing.”

But early re­turns on how some lead­ers and rank-and-file mem­bers are ex­plain­ing these events in Wash­ing­ton to con­stitu­ents at home don’t in­dic­ate any sud­den shift in that dir­ec­tion.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who most prom­in­ently pushed the strategy to tie fund­ing the gov­ern­ment to con­ces­sions on the Af­ford­able Care Act, de­clared Thursday he wasn’t back­ing down.

“I would do any­thing, and I will con­tin­ue to do any­thing I can, to stop the train wreck that is Obama­care,” Cruz told ABC News when asked if he would rule out for­cing an­oth­er shut­down.

“Even someone as cold as [Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er] Harry Re­id will have a hard time for­cing people to buy a bad, un­af­ford­able product from a web­site that doesn’t work,” tweeted Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga. It was Graves who in­tro­duced in the House the De­fund Obama­care Act of 2013, eli­cit­ing a wave of sup­port from con­ser­vat­ive groups and a move­ment among rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­ans to push for ac­tion on Obama­care.

And Graves is not the only House con­ser­vat­ive un­ready to stop the flow of rhet­or­ic. Rep. Mick Mul­vaney, R-S.C., sent out a re­lease Thursday ex­plain­ing his vote against the deal to tem­por­ar­ily fund gov­ern­ment through Jan. 15 and raise the debt ceil­ing through Feb. 7.

Among his reas­ons: “In­sur­ance com­pan­ies in Harry Re­id’s home state [of Nevada] are get­ting spe­cial treat­ment; so are bars and res­taur­ants in [House Minor­ity Lead­er] Nancy Pelosi’s dis­trict. Mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffs will re­ceive be­ne­fits that no oth­er cit­izens will re­ceive. That’s simply not right. And that’s what we were fight­ing against.”

But par­tis­an jabs per­sisted from both sides of the polit­ic­al aisle.

At the White House, Obama him­self leveled more cri­ti­cism at Re­pub­lic­ans, even while he called for their co­oper­a­tion over the re­mainder of the year and for a less shrill tone on both sides.

Pelosi con­tin­ued to blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the gov­ern­ment shut­down, ask­ing re­port­ers, “Was their tem­per tan­trum worth $24 bil­lion?” That’s a ref­er­ence to cred­it-rat­ing agency Stand­ard & Poor’s ana­lys­is that the shut­down cost the na­tion’s eco­nomy at least $24 bil­lion.

She went on to say she hopes the budget ne­go­ti­ations that are get­ting un­der way might provide a way around an­oth­er fisc­al show­down, but she also sug­ges­ted that the bi­par­tis­an talks need to be held in pub­lic, not be­hind closed doors.

Pelosi’s sug­ges­tion came with a barb, as she claimed Re­pub­lic­ans like to ig­nore hard data on budget and policy is­sues. “What seems to be miss­ing now in their caucus is a re­spect for facts,” she said. “It’s like a data-free zone.”

But not all of the chat­ter Thursday was par­tis­an.

Pride of au­thor­ship beamed in a press re­lease pos­ted by Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, who un­flinch­ingly took cred­it for a pro­vi­sion con­tained in the Wed­nes­day’s agree­ment that crit­ics have sug­ges­ted is tan­tamount to an ear­mark.

A state­ment pos­ted on his web­site, en­titled “Simpson Se­cures Wild­fire Fund­ing,” states: “Idaho Con­gress­man Mike Simpson en­sured that crit­ic­al wild­fire sup­pres­sion fund­ing was in­cluded in must-pass le­gis­la­tion to avert a po­ten­tial debt de­fault and end the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment shut­down.” The re­lease goes on to state that the fund­ing in­cluded $600 mil­lion for the U.S. Forest Ser­vice and $36 mil­lion for the In­teri­or De­part­ment.

But the week­end rhet­or­ic has yet to really be­gin. And not all law­makers have ne­ces­sar­ily gone home to carry forth more par­tis­an mes­saging.

Rep. Scott Ri­gell, R-Va., a Re­pub­lic­an who voted for the meas­ure Wed­nes­day night, held a town-hall event Thursday night, and one of the points on his agenda, ac­cord­ing to aides, was his be­lief there needs to be more ci­vil­ity in polit­ics.

As one of the points on his agenda said, “So many people are frus­trated and dis­ap­poin­ted in their gov­ern­ment — and rightly so.”

What We're Following See More »
THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
4 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
HE’D SIPHON OFF DEM VOTES
RNC Chief Would Welcome Bloomberg
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

“The lead­ers of the Re­pub­lic­an and Demo­crat­ic na­tion­al com­mit­tees on Wed­nes­day weighed in on the pro­spect of an in­de­pend­ent pres­id­en­tial run by” former New York City May­or Mi­chael Bloomberg (I). “DNC Chair­wo­man Debbie Wasser­man Schultz sug­ges­ted that the former New York City may­or’s pri­or­it­ies are already ‘well cared-for’ in the Demo­crat­ic plat­form, while RNC lead­er Re­ince Priebus wel­comed the idea, say­ing Bloomberg would si­phon off votes from the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate.”

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Large Is Hillary Clinton’s Delegate Lead?
6 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three hundred fifty-two, thanks to superdelegates pledged to Clinton, and the vagaries of the delegate allocation process in early states. Not bad, considering her results have been a virtual tie and a blowout loss.

Source:
×