The Rough Start to the Insurance Exchanges Doesn’t Matter

So what if Obama’s health insurance exchanges didn’t get up and running immediately? That doesn’t mean the program will fail — at least, not yet.

From left: White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett, Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius applaud during President Barack Obama speech about the error-plagued launch of the Affordable Care Act's online enrollment website in the Rose Garden of the White House October 21, 2013.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
Oct. 22, 2013, 7:03 a.m.

The level of hys­teria sur­round­ing the rol­lout of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s new web­site Health­Care.gov is something to be­hold. “Is Obama­care Pres­id­ent Obama’s Ir­aq war?” a re­port­er tweeted Monday just be­fore Obama gave a Rose Garden ad­dress on the rough start to the Af­ford­able Care Act’s on­line health in­sur­ance ex­changes. An­oth­er com­pared it to Hur­ricane Kat­rina.

Con­ser­vat­ives and the me­dia have been hound­ing the pres­id­ent for his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s shoddy web­site, his staffers’ un­for­tu­nate choice of words and for giv­ing the same press con­fer­ence he would have giv­en if the law’s im­ple­ment­a­tion had been smooth. None of that mat­ters very much.

There are two is­sues fa­cing the ad­min­is­tra­tion right now with re­spect to the ACA. One is­sue is that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s web­site doesn’t work. The oth­er is wheth­er Amer­ic­ans will have ac­cess to qual­ity, af­ford­able health care cov­er­age come March. That’s what ac­tu­ally mat­ters. And so far there’s no reas­on to think that the an­swer to that lat­ter ques­tion is no. Not yet, any­way.

In a private back­ground brief­ing with a hand­ful of journ­al­ists in the West Wing on Monday, the ad­min­is­tra­tion did not make any prom­ises as to when its web­site would be up and run­ning. “It isn’t the nature of com­puter glitches to say with 100 per­cent cer­tainty this will be fixed by X date,” an of­fi­cial ex­plained. Said an­oth­er, when pressed, “I can’t say to you right now wheth­er it’s a day or a week. What I do know is that we are throw­ing everything at it 24/7.”

A re­port­er asked if it was pos­sible the web­site couldn’t be fixed. “We don’t be­lieve that to be the case,” an of­fi­cial said.

We are cur­rently three weeks in­to Obama­care’s six-month open en­roll­ment peri­od and still the web­site has not been fixed. That’s a far cry from a death sen­tence. Of­fi­cials said Monday that they ex­pec­ted en­roll­ment in Oc­to­ber to be low, with a spike in Decem­ber pri­or to be­ne­fits be­gin­ning in Janu­ary, and an­oth­er spike in March be­fore the in­di­vidu­al man­date kicks in. Young people, in par­tic­u­lar, are ex­pec­ted to sign up closer to dead­line, ac­cord­ing to the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s mod­els.

Those mod­els aren’t base­less. When Mas­sachu­setts rolled out a sim­il­ar health in­sur­ance man­date in 2007, the biggest spike in en­roll­ment came in the two months lead­ing up to the time that people would be charged a pen­alty for not hav­ing cov­er­age, ac­cord­ing to Jon Kings­dale, who ran the state’s health-be­ne­fit ex­change at the time.

“The ana­logy is im­per­fect but the the lo­gic is cor­rect,” said Kings­dale, now a health ex­changes and health care re­form ex­pert with Bo­ston’s Wakely Con­sult­ing Group. In Mas­sachu­setts, nobody was sign­ing up in Oc­to­ber for in­sur­ance they would re­ceive in Janu­ary, and Kings­dale said he’d al­ways as­sumed en­roll­ment for Obama­care would be re­l­at­ively low too. “Not a lot of people want to pay in Oc­to­ber for be­ne­fits that don’t start un­til Janu­ary,” he ex­plained.

That’s not to say the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has the prob­lem un­der con­trol. De­tails about what’s gone wrong with the site have been ex­tremely vague. We still don’t have a clear ex­plan­a­tion of what went wrong and there’s reas­on to think the prob­lem can’t be fixed par­tic­u­larly quickly. In the in­ter­im, of­fi­cials are em­phas­iz­ing the non-di­git­al entry points to their sys­tem, in­clud­ing the abil­ity to call in or send a pa­per ap­plic­a­tion. That’s not, however, a sub­sti­tute for mak­ing their web­site work.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion still has time to do that. Al­though only 14 per­cent of adults say they have already vis­ited one of the ex­change web­sites, an ad­di­tion­al 23 per­cent say they think they will do so in the next few months, ac­cord­ing to a sur­vey by the Pew Re­search Cen­ter con­duc­ted Oct. 9 - 13. Those without health in­sur­ance are more likely than those with in­sur­ance to have already vis­ited (22 per­cent vs. 12 per­cent) or to plan to do so (42 per­cent vs. 19 per­cent) in the com­ing months.

The ques­tion is, at what point will a dys­func­tion­al web­site im­pede the law’s abil­ity to func­tion? White House of­fi­cials didn’t have a tar­get date for that but most ex­perts point to some time around mid-Novem­ber, or even Thanks­giv­ing, as the cru­cial mo­ment when the health in­sur­ance mar­ket­place needs to be work­ing.

“There are two cam­paigns,” Kings­dale told me, “the en­roll­ment cam­paign and the polit­ic­al cam­paign. Oc­to­ber is ob­vi­ously very big in the polit­ic­al cam­paign but it’s not that big in the en­roll­ment cam­paign. Novem­ber is the month that’s key.”

On Monday I pressed ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials for a con­crete “drop-dead” date and they couldn’t give me a time frame. In­stead they poin­ted out the good that the law has done already, such as the fact that in the course of 17 days, 56,000 in Ore­gon have signed up for the health law’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. “That num­ber is go­ing to dra­mat­ic­ally in­crease over the course of the next six months,” they ad­ded. It hasn’t been a Whole Foods shop­ping ex­per­i­ence; that much we know is true. The ques­tion now is what hap­pens in a month.

What We're Following See More »
MARCIA FUDGE TO PRESIDE
Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

Source:
EARLY BUMP FOR TRUMP?
New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
2 days ago
THE LATEST
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.
BELLWETHER?
Candidates Deadlocked in Ohio
3 days ago
THE LATEST
17-POINT EDGE AMONG MILLENNIALS
Clinton Dominates Among Younger Voters
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

In an election between two candidates around 70 years of age, millennials strongly prefer one over the other. Hillary Clinton has a 47%-30% edge among votes 18 to 29. She also leads 46%-36% among voters aged 30 to 44.

Source:
NEW POLL SHOWS TROUBLE FOR TRUMP
Clinton Leads Trump Among Latinos by Nearly 70 Points
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

According to an online tracking poll released by New Latino Voice, Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump among Latino voters, attracting support from 81 percent of Latino voters, to just 12 percent support for Trump. The results of this poll are consistent with those from a series of other surveys conducted by various organizations. With Pew Research predicting the 2016 electorate will be 12 percent Hispanic, which would be the highest ever, Trump could be in serious trouble if he can't close the gap.

Source:
×