The Rough Start to the Insurance Exchanges Doesn’t Matter

So what if Obama’s health insurance exchanges didn’t get up and running immediately? That doesn’t mean the program will fail — at least, not yet.

From left: White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett, Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius applaud during President Barack Obama speech about the error-plagued launch of the Affordable Care Act's online enrollment website in the Rose Garden of the White House October 21, 2013.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
Oct. 22, 2013, 7:03 a.m.

The level of hys­teria sur­round­ing the rol­lout of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s new web­site Health­Care.gov is something to be­hold. “Is Obama­care Pres­id­ent Obama’s Ir­aq war?” a re­port­er tweeted Monday just be­fore Obama gave a Rose Garden ad­dress on the rough start to the Af­ford­able Care Act’s on­line health in­sur­ance ex­changes. An­oth­er com­pared it to Hur­ricane Kat­rina.

Con­ser­vat­ives and the me­dia have been hound­ing the pres­id­ent for his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s shoddy web­site, his staffers’ un­for­tu­nate choice of words and for giv­ing the same press con­fer­ence he would have giv­en if the law’s im­ple­ment­a­tion had been smooth. None of that mat­ters very much.

There are two is­sues fa­cing the ad­min­is­tra­tion right now with re­spect to the ACA. One is­sue is that the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s web­site doesn’t work. The oth­er is wheth­er Amer­ic­ans will have ac­cess to qual­ity, af­ford­able health care cov­er­age come March. That’s what ac­tu­ally mat­ters. And so far there’s no reas­on to think that the an­swer to that lat­ter ques­tion is no. Not yet, any­way.

In a private back­ground brief­ing with a hand­ful of journ­al­ists in the West Wing on Monday, the ad­min­is­tra­tion did not make any prom­ises as to when its web­site would be up and run­ning. “It isn’t the nature of com­puter glitches to say with 100 per­cent cer­tainty this will be fixed by X date,” an of­fi­cial ex­plained. Said an­oth­er, when pressed, “I can’t say to you right now wheth­er it’s a day or a week. What I do know is that we are throw­ing everything at it 24/7.”

A re­port­er asked if it was pos­sible the web­site couldn’t be fixed. “We don’t be­lieve that to be the case,” an of­fi­cial said.

We are cur­rently three weeks in­to Obama­care’s six-month open en­roll­ment peri­od and still the web­site has not been fixed. That’s a far cry from a death sen­tence. Of­fi­cials said Monday that they ex­pec­ted en­roll­ment in Oc­to­ber to be low, with a spike in Decem­ber pri­or to be­ne­fits be­gin­ning in Janu­ary, and an­oth­er spike in March be­fore the in­di­vidu­al man­date kicks in. Young people, in par­tic­u­lar, are ex­pec­ted to sign up closer to dead­line, ac­cord­ing to the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s mod­els.

Those mod­els aren’t base­less. When Mas­sachu­setts rolled out a sim­il­ar health in­sur­ance man­date in 2007, the biggest spike in en­roll­ment came in the two months lead­ing up to the time that people would be charged a pen­alty for not hav­ing cov­er­age, ac­cord­ing to Jon Kings­dale, who ran the state’s health-be­ne­fit ex­change at the time.

“The ana­logy is im­per­fect but the the lo­gic is cor­rect,” said Kings­dale, now a health ex­changes and health care re­form ex­pert with Bo­ston’s Wakely Con­sult­ing Group. In Mas­sachu­setts, nobody was sign­ing up in Oc­to­ber for in­sur­ance they would re­ceive in Janu­ary, and Kings­dale said he’d al­ways as­sumed en­roll­ment for Obama­care would be re­l­at­ively low too. “Not a lot of people want to pay in Oc­to­ber for be­ne­fits that don’t start un­til Janu­ary,” he ex­plained.

That’s not to say the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has the prob­lem un­der con­trol. De­tails about what’s gone wrong with the site have been ex­tremely vague. We still don’t have a clear ex­plan­a­tion of what went wrong and there’s reas­on to think the prob­lem can’t be fixed par­tic­u­larly quickly. In the in­ter­im, of­fi­cials are em­phas­iz­ing the non-di­git­al entry points to their sys­tem, in­clud­ing the abil­ity to call in or send a pa­per ap­plic­a­tion. That’s not, however, a sub­sti­tute for mak­ing their web­site work.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion still has time to do that. Al­though only 14 per­cent of adults say they have already vis­ited one of the ex­change web­sites, an ad­di­tion­al 23 per­cent say they think they will do so in the next few months, ac­cord­ing to a sur­vey by the Pew Re­search Cen­ter con­duc­ted Oct. 9 - 13. Those without health in­sur­ance are more likely than those with in­sur­ance to have already vis­ited (22 per­cent vs. 12 per­cent) or to plan to do so (42 per­cent vs. 19 per­cent) in the com­ing months.

The ques­tion is, at what point will a dys­func­tion­al web­site im­pede the law’s abil­ity to func­tion? White House of­fi­cials didn’t have a tar­get date for that but most ex­perts point to some time around mid-Novem­ber, or even Thanks­giv­ing, as the cru­cial mo­ment when the health in­sur­ance mar­ket­place needs to be work­ing.

“There are two cam­paigns,” Kings­dale told me, “the en­roll­ment cam­paign and the polit­ic­al cam­paign. Oc­to­ber is ob­vi­ously very big in the polit­ic­al cam­paign but it’s not that big in the en­roll­ment cam­paign. Novem­ber is the month that’s key.”

On Monday I pressed ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials for a con­crete “drop-dead” date and they couldn’t give me a time frame. In­stead they poin­ted out the good that the law has done already, such as the fact that in the course of 17 days, 56,000 in Ore­gon have signed up for the health law’s Medi­caid ex­pan­sion. “That num­ber is go­ing to dra­mat­ic­ally in­crease over the course of the next six months,” they ad­ded. It hasn’t been a Whole Foods shop­ping ex­per­i­ence; that much we know is true. The ques­tion now is what hap­pens in a month.

What We're Following See More »
ON THE CALL: “AT LEAST THAT WAS SACRED”
Gen. Kelly Rips Rep. Wilson for Criticism
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP FORMER PRES V. GOP CURRENT PRES
Bush Slams Trump, Implicitly
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
MEETING WITH SENATE GOP
Trump to Hill Next Tuesday
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS
INTERPARTY FEUDING CONTINUES UNDER PEREZ
Longtime Progressive Members Pushed Out at DNC
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A shake-up is underway at the Democratic National Committee as several key longtime officials have lost their posts, exposing a still-raw rift in the party and igniting anger among those in its progressive wing who see retaliation for their opposition to DNC Chairman Tom Perez. The ousters come ahead of the DNC's first meeting, in Las Vegas, Nevada, since Perez took over as chairman with a pledge this year to unite a party that had become badly divided during the brutal Bernie Sanders-Hillary Clinton 2016 primary race."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login