Oil Boom Putting Pressure on Both Pipelines and Rails

Scorched oil tankers remain on July 10, 2013 at the train derailment site in Lac-Megantic, Quebec. Edward Bukhardt, CEO of Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railways Inc.,(MMA) told reporters Wednesday that the train was left running while the engineer spent the night sleeping in a hotel in Nantes, adding that the engineer was following standard 'industry practice.' The train carrying crude oil from North Dakota derailed in the town of Lac-Megantic overnight Friday, causing a massive fire and explosions that killedat least 15 people, with another 45 still missing. 
National Journal
Alex Brown
Add to Briefcase
Alex Brown
Oct. 22, 2013, 6:01 p.m.

As North Amer­ic­an oil pro­duc­tion con­tin­ues to out­pace pipeline ca­pa­city, rail­ways are in­creas­ingly filling the gap. But a series of ex­plos­ive Ca­na­dian de­rail­ments have raised ques­tions about rail as a trans­port­a­tion al­tern­at­ive, and some are say­ing that oil gone off-the-tracks un­der­scores the need for pipeline ex­pan­sion.

“You saw the train ac­ci­dent in Canada,” said House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., when asked about the pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline car­ry­ing heavy crude from Canada to U.S. re­finer­ies. He called pipelines “cheap­er and safer” than trains.

Even Key­stone op­pon­ents are wary of the bur­geon­ing oil-by-rail in­dustry. “Oil com­pan­ies have star­ted fa­cing a pipeline bot­tle­neck,” said Keith Stew­art, cli­mate and en­ergy cam­paign co­ordin­at­or for Green­peace Canada. As a res­ult, rail­cars are car­ry­ing more and more oil, a meth­od that has “been un­safe since the 1990s.”¦ [But the cars] con­tin­ue to be used.”

For Stew­art, rail prob­lems and pipeline-safety is­sues are a sig­nal that it’s time for heav­ier in­vest­ment in re­new­able en­ergy be­cause pet­ro­leum trans­port will al­ways present en­vir­on­ment­al risks.

Oth­ers see it dif­fer­ently. North Amer­ic­an oil pro­duc­tion con­tin­ues to climb, say in­dustry groups and pipeline ad­voc­ates, and cur­rent con­sumer de­mand dic­tates that it will reach the mar­ket one way or an­oth­er. In the U.S., oil-by-rail ship­ments have doubled in two years, from 700,000 bar­rels a day to 1.4 mil­lion. West­ern Canada, ship­ping min­im­al amounts of crude by rail at the start of last year, now ex­ports 150,000 bar­rels per day on trains. That num­ber could jump to 360,000 bar­rels by the end of 2014, ac­cord­ing to in­dustry data and ana­lys­is com­pany IHS.

Tran­sCanada, the pro­spect­ive build­er of the Key­stone XL pipeline, es­tim­ates North Amer­ic­an trains could be mov­ing 2 mil­lion bar­rels a day be­fore 2014 is out.

That ex­pan­sion has al­lowed the in­dustry to bring North Amer­ic­an oil to mar­ket while pipelines catch up. But not every­one sees that as a good thing. In Ju­ly, a freight train car­ry­ing crude oil de­railed in Lac-Mégant­ic, Que­bec, killing 42 in the sub­sequent ex­plo­sion. Canada tightened safety stand­ards re­lated to the spe­cif­ics of that dis­aster, but a Sat­urday de­rail­ment and ex­plo­sion in Al­berta has re­newed wor­ries.

Just as the Que­bec de­rail­ment has be­come a flash point for the dangers of rail trans­port, crit­ics of­ten cite the 2010 En­bridge pipeline spill in­to Michigan’s Kala­ma­zoo River as an ex­ample of pipeline dangers. More than 1 mil­lion gal­lons of crude flowed in­to the river, thanks to a 17-hour delay between the ini­tial alarms and the com­pany’s re­ac­tion. Dredging cleanups have con­tin­ued as re­cently as this year, as the di­luted bitu­men shipped in the pipeline sunk to the river bot­tom.

Still, said Up­ton, that spill — the ef­fects of which made it down­stream to his dis­trict — should not be a reas­on to stop pipeline ex­pan­sion. He noted that the pipeline-safety bill he sponsored in 2011, and that was signed in­to law in early 2012, re­quires faster spill re­port­ing and great­er ac­count­ab­il­ity for pipeline op­er­at­ors. “Isn’t it bet­ter to put it in a pipeline than it is in a ship or a truck or rail?” he asked.

What We're Following See More »
JUST AS SENATE VOTES ITS DISAPPROVAL
Trump Backtracks on Putin's "Incredible Offer"
1 days ago
THE LATEST
ARMS CONTROL, SYRIA WERE DISCUSSED
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Source:
WAS "GRUDGINGLY" CONVINCED
Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

TAKE THAT, HATERS
Trump: High IQ People Loved the Putin Meeting
2 days ago
THE LATEST
"POLICY DIFFERENCES DON'T MATTER"
Comey Says to Vote Democratic This Fall
3 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login