Is Immigration Really Dead in the House?

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID), speaks at the Conservative Political Action conference (CPAC), on February 10, 2011 in Washington, DC. The CPAC annual gathering is a project of the American Conservative Union. 
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Oct. 22, 2013, 4:20 p.m.

Rep. Raul Lab­rador, R-Idaho, de­clared im­mig­ra­tion re­form dead, so why aren’t the op­pon­ents of a big over­haul pour­ing the cham­pagne?

Be­cause they know bet­ter than any­one that the is­sue could be re­sur­rec­ted at any time.

When Pres­id­ent Obama de­clared im­mig­ra­tion re­form his top post-shut­down pri­or­ity, op­pon­ents of a path­way to cit­izen­ship could have de­clared vic­tory then and there. The pres­id­ent’s ad­vocacy gives House Re­pub­lic­ans an easy way to ig­nore the is­sue, much like a teen­ager tunes out a nag­ging moth­er. The bad blood between the White House and House Speak­er John Boehner got worse dur­ing the gov­ern­ment shut­down, mak­ing bi­par­tis­an ne­go­ti­ations on oth­er is­sues more dif­fi­cult. Re­pub­lic­ans also flinch at the thought of giv­ing Obama an­oth­er leg­acy vic­tory.

All this should add up to a dead is­sue. “So why am I not sleep­ing at night?” quer­ied Roy Beck, pres­id­ent of Num­ber­sUSA, a grass­roots group that has ef­fect­ively lob­bied dozens of rank-and-file House Re­pub­lic­ans to op­pose any­thing that could lead to leg­al­iz­a­tion of people without pa­pers. “What wor­ries me is that Boehner and the busi­ness lob­bies get to­geth­er to pull some kind of man­euver” for a lim­ited leg­al­iz­a­tion/guest-work­er/bor­der-se­cur­ity bill. “Then Demo­crats in the Sen­ate will say, “˜Maybe this is our last chance un­til 2017,’ “ he said.

That’s all it would take. Obama would sign it, and a trouble­some is­sue for Re­pub­lic­ans would be off the table un­til at least after the next pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. Re­pub­lic­ans could then ap­peal to His­pan­ic voters who are angry at Obama for ig­nor­ing them dur­ing most of his ad­min­is­tra­tion.

It could be tough for Demo­crats to say no to half a loaf. “This is very tricky for the press and lib­er­al im­mig­ra­tion ad­voc­ates. If they try to ar­gue that this is un­fair and this is second-class cit­izen­ship and they kill it, they’re go­ing to look ter­rible,” said Alf­onso Aguilar, a former Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial who touts the be­ne­fits of im­mig­ra­tion re­form for Re­pub­lic­ans. He now runs the Latino Part­ner­ship for Con­ser­vat­ive Prin­ciples.

Power­ful House Re­pub­lic­ans like Boehner, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor, and Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an all want to see something hap­pen on im­mig­ra­tion. The only thing that has stopped them is skep­ti­cism from tea parti­ers like Rep. Lou Bar­letta, R-Pa., who says that Obama hasn’t en­forced ex­ist­ing laws, or Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan., who warns that the pres­id­ent is us­ing the is­sue for polit­ic­al gain. This group of hard-line House mem­bers is amp­li­fied by non­stop ad­vocacy from groups like Num­ber­sUSA, which flood their of­fices with calls say­ing there should be no leg­al­iz­a­tion for un­au­thor­ized im­mig­rants un­der any cir­cum­stances.

Beck’s grass­roots net­work has been act­ively lob­by­ing House Re­pub­lic­ans this week to stop a non­con­tro­ver­sial bor­der-se­cur­ity bill from com­ing to the House floor, fear­ing that the meas­ure is the “camel’s nose un­der the tent” lead­ing to leg­al­iz­a­tion of un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants. The bill could be­come a con­fer­ence-com­mit­tee vehicle with a Sen­ate bill that would give un­au­thor­ized im­mig­rants a 13-year path to cit­izen­ship. The roughly two dozen House Re­pub­lic­ans who want to avoid such ne­go­ti­ations “re­main scared to death of [House GOP] lead­er­ship on this,” Beck said.

Boehner has made it clear for months that he wants the House to vote on im­mig­ra­tion in a piece-by-piece fash­ion. He has cat­egor­ic­ally re­jec­ted the Sen­ate’s broad­er bill. The House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee has read­ied four oth­er im­mig­ra­tion bills that could come to the House floor at any time; none of them has Demo­crat­ic sup­port. Can­tor is work­ing on a bill that would give a path to cit­izen­ship to some un­doc­u­mented youth who were brought to the coun­try as chil­dren.

All of those meas­ures form the basis of a de­cidedly Re­pub­lic­an re­sponse to Obama’s chal­lenge to act on im­mig­ra­tion. Aguilar terms it as “no spe­cial path to cit­izen­ship,” mean­ing to leg­al­ize the un­doc­u­mented im­mig­rants who qual­i­fy un­der a Re­pub­lic­an-defined set of con­di­tions, then let those now-leg­al im­mig­rants fig­ure out how to use ex­ist­ing chan­nels to be­come cit­izens if they so choose.

“It’s all out there. There is a con­ser­vat­ive an­swer that is “˜leg­al status.’ There is lead­er­ship and grown-ups in the House that un­der­stands it needs to get done,” said Tamar Jac­oby, a con­ser­vat­ive who runs the busi­ness-centered lobby group Im­mig­ra­tion­Works USA.

The only ques­tion is wheth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans will take up that mantle. The de­cision is likely to come from with­in the House Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence, where dif­fer­ent opin­ions reside, and the an­swer may not sur­face im­me­di­ately.

Ad­voc­ates on all sides fear de­feat in the post-shut­down en­vir­on­ment, and none smell vic­tory. That means the is­sue isn’t dead, but it could lie dormant for some time.

What We're Following See More »
KIM CALLS TRUMP A “DOTARD”
North Korea Threatens H-Bomb Test Over Pacific
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"North Korea said on Friday it might test a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific Ocean after President Donald Trump vowed to destroy the reclusive country, with leader Kim Jong Un promising to make Trump pay dearly for his threats. Kim did not specify what action he would take against the United States or Trump, whom he called a 'mentally deranged U.S. dotard' in the latest bout of insults the two leaders have traded in recent weeks."

Source:
INFORMS CONGRESS RE: EXECUTIVE ORDER
Trump Makes Good on Promise of New North Korea Sanctions
1 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump this afternoon announced another round of sanctions on North Korea, calling the regime "a continuing threat." The executive order, which Trump relayed to Congress, bans any ship or plane that has visited North Korea from visiting the United States within 180 days. The order also authorizes sanctions on any financial institution doing business with North Korea, and permits the secretaries of State and the Treasury to sanction any person involved in trading with North Korea, operating a port there, or involved in a variety of industries there.

SOUTH KOREA WILL SEND AID
Trump Promises More Sanctions on North Korea
2 days ago
THE LATEST

In response to a reporter's question, President Trump said "he’ll be looking to impose further financial penalties on North Korea over its nuclear and ballistic tests. ... The U.N. has passed two resolutions recently aimed at squeezing the North Korean economy by cutting off oil, labor and exports to the nation." Meanwhile, the Guardian reports that South Korea's unification ministry is sending an $8m aid package aimed at infants and pregnant women in North Korea. The "humanitarian gesture [is] at odds with calls by Japan and the US for unwavering economic and diplomatic pressure on Pyongyang."

Source:
HIGHLIGHT ISSUES FACING KIDS
FLOTUS to Speak at UN Luncheon
3 days ago
THE LATEST
PRESSES CASE FOR REFORMS
Trump Meets with UN Leaders
3 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump on Tuesday night met with UN Secretary Guterres and President of the General Assembly Miroslav Lajcak. In both cases, as per releases from the White House, Trump pressed them on the need to reform the UN bureaucracy.

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login