How the Next Two Months Will Change Paul Ryan’s Life

A Ryan interested in serving as speaker, after a short stint perhaps as Ways and Means Committee chairman, may handle negotiations differently than one who plans to run for president in 2016.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) walks to a meeting with House Republicans on Capitol Hill October 16, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Billy House
Oct. 22, 2013, 6:01 p.m.

Paul Ry­an is a name syn­onym­ous with Re­pub­lic­an fisc­al pri­or­it­ies. As the House Budget Com­mit­tee chair­man, and as the GOP’s vice-pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate last year, the na­tion’s debts and de­fi­cits have been the center­piece of his polit­ic­al ca­reer.

But as the House and Sen­ate be­gin a budget con­fer­ence next week for the first time in four years, what kind of ne­go­ti­at­or will he be?

The an­swer may lie in what Ry­an, whose polit­ic­al fu­ture ap­pears both bright and clouded, wants to do next. A Ry­an in­ter­ested in serving as speak­er, after a short stint per­haps as Ways and Means Com­mit­tee chair­man, may handle ne­go­ti­ations dif­fer­ently than one who plans to run for pres­id­ent in 2016.

Either way, the ne­go­ti­ations and their out­come could have an im­pact on the Wis­con­sin con­gress­man’s fu­ture, present­ing both op­por­tun­it­ies and risks.

“How he handles this one and what, if any­thing, is agreed to could be a sem­in­al point in Paul’s le­gis­lat­ive ca­reer,” says Wil­li­am Hoag­land, a seni­or vice pres­id­ent at the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter, former Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee staff dir­ect­or, and long­time GOP aide.

Ry­an’s staff says he is not dwell­ing on the po­ten­tial im­pact on his own polit­ic­al ca­reer as he steps up as the top Re­pub­lic­an ne­go­ti­at­or on the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee. “We’ll leave it to oth­ers to spec­u­late on Chair­man Ry­an’s fu­ture,” House Budget Com­mit­tee spokes­man Wil­li­am Al­lis­on said. “His fo­cus is on get­ting a budget deal and provid­ing re­lief for fam­il­ies.”

But oth­ers, in­clud­ing House Minor­ity Whip Steny Hoy­er, D-Md., note that Ry­an was among those who voted last week against the deal to re­open gov­ern­ment and lift the debt ceil­ing. That same deal is what pro­duced the re­quire­ment for the budget con­fer­ence com­mit­tee, and Hoy­er says Ry­an’s op­pos­i­tion to it “does not bode well.”

Staff is already at work, but all 29 con­fer­ees will form­ally be­gin meet­ing next week in a meet­ing that will be broad­cast live. They have un­til roughly Dec. 13 to come up with a new gov­ern­ment spend­ing plan for both cham­bers (the cur­rent stop­gap ex­pires on Jan. 15).

Skep­ti­cism abounds over wheth­er the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee will be able to come up with any agree­ment at all. Ry­an and Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray, D-Wash., will start with their vastly dif­fer­ent House and Sen­ate budget res­ol­u­tions. Neither will be ac­cep­ted by the oth­er. Ry­an’s House pro­pos­al is billed as bal­an­cing the budget in 10 years by cut­ting spend­ing to the tune of $5.7 tril­lion. Mur­ray’s blue­print calls for a com­bin­a­tion of new rev­en­ue and spend­ing cuts to re­duce the de­fi­cit by $1.8 tril­lion.

There is mu­tu­al dis­taste for the across-the-board se­quester cuts, though a new round is set to kick in early next year. Demo­crats call for re­pla­cing the se­quester with a com­bin­a­tion of new rev­en­ue and spend­ing cuts, while Ry­an and Re­pub­lic­ans aren’t on board with rais­ing new rev­en­ue, and in­stead fo­cus on trans­fer­ring more cuts onto do­mest­ic pro­grams and re­du­cing dis­cre­tion­ary spend­ing.

Oth­er key areas of dis­cus­sion could be tax and en­ti­tle­ment re­form. Ry­an wrote an op-ed column earli­er this month de­clar­ing, “We could ask the bet­ter off to pay high­er premi­ums for Medi­care. We could re­form Medigap plans to en­cour­age ef­fi­ciency and re­duce costs. And we could ask fed­er­al em­ploy­ees to con­trib­ute more to their own re­tire­ment.” Demo­crats call for mak­ing cuts, but without mak­ing ma­jor struc­tur­al changes to en­ti­tle­ments.

Ex­perts say the budget con­fer­ence gives Ry­an and Demo­crats a chance to fully de­bate fisc­al policy — with at least some of that tak­ing place be­fore the cam­er­as — and how Ry­an plays it will mat­ter.

Some say Ry­an could play more to con­ser­vat­ives and tea-party mem­bers in his party, an al­le­gi­ance he ad­hered to last week and one that could fur­ther as­pir­a­tions to rise in House lead­er­ship.

Oth­ers say Ry­an, re­cog­niz­ing the GOP’s plum­met­ing stand­ing in pub­lic polls in the wake of the shut­down, could choose to make some com­prom­ises. That po­s­i­tion could gen­er­ate grumbling from House GOP hard-liners, but may also boost Ry­an’s im­age as someone ser­i­ous about gov­ern­ing.

“Ry­an has the op­por­tun­ity to put his fisc­al cred­ib­il­ity to work on the be­half of com­prom­ise,” said Wil­li­am Gal­ston, a seni­or fel­low at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion’s Gov­ernance Stud­ies Pro­gram and a cofounder of No La­bels, a group that ad­voc­ates for non­par­tis­an solu­tions.

But if this con­fer­ence comes out with ma­jor rev­en­ue in­creases, Hoag­land says, “I think that would be a real prob­lem for him in the fu­ture.”

In some ways, Gal­ston said, Ry­an’s repu­ta­tion as a fisc­al con­ser­vat­ive gives him more stand­ing to make a stab at com­prom­ise. He likened him to the late Sen. Ed­ward Kennedy and the stand­ing he had with Demo­crats. “Kennedy was cred­ible when he told people in his party, “˜This is the best we can do’ in ne­go­ti­ations with Re­pub­lic­ans,” he said.

But wheth­er Ry­an is will­ing to do so is un­cer­tain — and so is how it may be re­ceived. Even if Ry­an and Mur­ray do craft a com­prom­ise — per­haps a one- or two-year deal — there is no guar­an­tee the House Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence would vote for it.

Steve Pruitt, a former House Budget Com­mit­tee Demo­crat­ic staff dir­ect­or who is now a man­aging part­ner at Watts Part­ners, said, “I know that Paul Ry­an knows that the best de­vel­op­ment on the budget would be for him to truly seek a deal that would move the coun­try for­ward.”

However, he said he doesn’t be­lieve Ry­an has any more abil­ity to lead his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues than Speak­er John Boehner or the rest of the Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship team.

As for Ry­an’s fu­ture, Pruitt sug­gests, “The iden­tity and polit­ic­al lean­ings of the 218 people who might vote on any con­fer­ence agree­ment he de­liv­ers to the House will de­term­ine his next move.”

“If a ma­jor­ity of the Re­pub­lic­an caucus sup­ports the agree­ment, he’d have the abil­ity to run for speak­er or on a na­tion­al tick­et,” he said. “But if any con­fer­ence com­mit­tee agree­ment re­quires votes of the Demo­crats and mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans for House ap­prov­al, then I’d start look­ing for Ry­an’s next book on life in the Con­gress.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×