Congressional Republicans have a message for Democrats suddenly expressing angst about the newly implemented health care law: We told you so.
Even before Thursday’s House committee hearing, where contractors responsible for HealthCare.gov site were grilled by lawmakers, Republicans were feeling validated by the apparent flaws of Obamacare.
“Each and every day people are finding out that their premiums are going up, that they can’t keep the insurance plan they like. It’s a disaster,” Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, said Wednesday. “And that’s sort of confirming, I think, some of the key arguments we were making over the past several weeks.”
Indeed, Republicans, fresh off a failed campaign to defund and delay the law’s implementation, say their worst fears about President Obama’s health care law are being realized. This is especially true regarding the individual mandate, which requires uninsured people to enroll in the new health care exchanges or face a penalty. After their initial defund effort failed, Republicans pushed hard for a one-year delay of this provision, predicting that people would be unable to enroll due to technical difficulties that were being whispered about even before Oct. 1.
“The one thing we were really asking for is a delay of the individual mandate “¦ so the American people [would not] be required to sign up on a website for something that they can’t even get on the website and sign up for,” said Rep. John Fleming, R-La. “So it only made sense to give them a break for a year.”
The effort to delay the individual mandate ultimately failed, but Republican fears have proved prescient. Now, with millions of uninsured Americans struggling to navigate a dysfunctional enrollment system, a growing chorus of Democrats is calling for exactly what Republicans asked for weeks ago.
“We have to consider delaying the mandate that is the penalty,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said on MSNBC Thursday.
Blumenthal joins the swelling ranks of congressional Democrats urging Obama to either extend the enrollment period past the March 31 deadline, or delay the penalty for those who do fail to register by that date. The groundswell started on Tuesday with a letter to the White House from Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., which asked Obama “to consider extending open enrollment beyond the current end date of March 31, 2014.”
Meanwhile, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., is touting legislation to delay the individual mandate by one year.
These Democratic defections are not lost on Republicans, who took the brunt of public blame for an Obamacare-induced government shutdown.
“We are starting to see Democrats flip as this thing — it’s a train wreck. It’s not working,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, chief architect of the GOP’s anti-Obamacare effort, told Fox News on Wednesday. “And, in any political fight, when the truth is on your side, you are in a good situation. And here the truth is this thing isn’t working.”
With the Senate adjourned until next week, the immediate heavy lifting — in terms of oversight and investigation of the health care law’s problems — has fallen to the House. And Thursday’s hearing was just the beginning. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius will testify in front of the Energy and Commerce Committee next Wednesday, the same day HHS officials are expected to brief House Republicans on the turbulent implementation of Obamacare. Meanwhile, several other committees are preparing to hold health care-related hearings to keep the spotlight on what they have long argued are fatal flaws of the Affordable Care Act.
Republicans insist they take no joy in seeing Americans suffer under the new health care law. But they do take comfort in knowing that voters now realize what they’ve been fighting against — not just in recent weeks, but since the law was enacted in 2010.
“Now that we’re past the date of Oct. 1, Obama and [Senate Majority Leader Harry] Reid, they own this thing,” said Rep. Tom Graves, R-Ga., who sponsored the original legislation to defund Obamacare. “And all of America knows that it was John Boehner and the House Republicans who did everything they could to protect them from it.”
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."