Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., issued an unusually fiery statement Monday, complaining that the Intelligence Committee was uninformed about the National Security Agency’s surveillance of U.S. allies, which she said was cause for an immediate full review of all intelligence programs.
“It is abundantly clear that a total review of all intelligence programs is necessary so that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee are fully informed as to what is actually being carried out by the intelligence community,” Feinstein said in a press release.
Feinstein drew a distinction between the NSA’s collection of phone records through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which she supports, and monitoring calls of friendly leaders, to which she said she is “totally opposed.”
Feinstein said that such surveillance should only be permissible if the U.S. is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for such surveillance, in which case it should be up to the president to approve.
Recent revelations that the NSA has monitored the cell phones of foreign leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, came to light from information leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who is hiding out under temporary asylum in Russia.
“It is my understanding that President Obama was not aware Chancellor Merkel’s communications were being collected since 2002. That is a big problem,” she said.
Feinstein said she supported the White House’s announcement that phone surveillance of allied leaders will cease but reiterated the need for a full review of all intelligence programs.
But later National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden issued a statement that would not confirm that surveillance on all foreign leaders would cease, only that a review on the appropriate posture when it comes to heads of state had been under way since the summer and decisions were still being made.
“The administration’s review is ongoing so I’m not in a position to discuss the details or the outcomes, but we have already made some decisions through this process and expect to make more as we continue,” Hayden said. “The review is meant to be completed by the end of the year.”
Feinstein said that the events dictated a thorough examination of intelligence initiatives.
“As far as I’m concerned, Congress needs to know exactly what our intelligence community is doing. To that end, the committee will initiate a major review into all intelligence-collection programs,” she said.
Separately, the Senate Intelligence Committee is scheduled to vote on legislation behind closed doors Tuesday, intended to add greater transparency and accountability to the NSA’s domestic surveillance of the phone and Internet records of millions of Americans.
Feinstein has argued that such programs are necessary for national security but favors legislation intended to enhance the program’s credibility, such as making clear there are express limits on access to such information.
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.