Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., issued an unusually fiery statement Monday, complaining that the Intelligence Committee was uninformed about the National Security Agency’s surveillance of U.S. allies, which she said was cause for an immediate full review of all intelligence programs.
“It is abundantly clear that a total review of all intelligence programs is necessary so that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee are fully informed as to what is actually being carried out by the intelligence community,” Feinstein said in a press release.
Feinstein drew a distinction between the NSA’s collection of phone records through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which she supports, and monitoring calls of friendly leaders, to which she said she is “totally opposed.”
Feinstein said that such surveillance should only be permissible if the U.S. is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for such surveillance, in which case it should be up to the president to approve.
Recent revelations that the NSA has monitored the cell phones of foreign leaders, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel, came to light from information leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, who is hiding out under temporary asylum in Russia.
“It is my understanding that President Obama was not aware Chancellor Merkel’s communications were being collected since 2002. That is a big problem,” she said.
Feinstein said she supported the White House’s announcement that phone surveillance of allied leaders will cease but reiterated the need for a full review of all intelligence programs.
But later National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden issued a statement that would not confirm that surveillance on all foreign leaders would cease, only that a review on the appropriate posture when it comes to heads of state had been under way since the summer and decisions were still being made.
“The administration’s review is ongoing so I’m not in a position to discuss the details or the outcomes, but we have already made some decisions through this process and expect to make more as we continue,” Hayden said. “The review is meant to be completed by the end of the year.”
Feinstein said that the events dictated a thorough examination of intelligence initiatives.
“As far as I’m concerned, Congress needs to know exactly what our intelligence community is doing. To that end, the committee will initiate a major review into all intelligence-collection programs,” she said.
Separately, the Senate Intelligence Committee is scheduled to vote on legislation behind closed doors Tuesday, intended to add greater transparency and accountability to the NSA’s domestic surveillance of the phone and Internet records of millions of Americans.
Feinstein has argued that such programs are necessary for national security but favors legislation intended to enhance the program’s credibility, such as making clear there are express limits on access to such information.
What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.