Several thousand workers from the coal and mining industry and their families converged on the west lawn of the Capitol building Tuesday to protest the Environmental Protection Agency’s greenhouse-gas regulations.
The event, organized by Count on Coal, a grassroots coal-advocacy group, brought together lawmakers and coal workers from states like West Virginia, Kentucky, and Ohio, which are likely to be hard hit by EPA’s regulations on coal-fired power plants.
“The coal business is really hurting because of what Obama’s done and we’re just trying to make a statement,” said Steve Morton, a 62-year-old worker at a preparation plant for a coal mine operated by KenAmerican Resources in Kentucky.
“They want to put coal out of business is what they want to do,” he added. “They’re doing their best to put regulations in place that nobody can afford.”
A number of lawmakers spoke at the rally, including Reps. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., and Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., along with Sens. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
Many of them, including Capito, Paul, and McConnell, rallied around what has now become a well-worn battle cry of the coal industry — the idea that President Obama is waging a war on coal.
“When coal suffers, it’s not just the miners who suffer “¦ it’s the truck driver, it’s the waiter, it’s the teacher, it’s our railroads,” Capito said, to cheers. “Make no mistake: This is a war on coal. This is a war on American jobs.”
Paul similarly slammed the White House when he took to the stage amid considerable applause.
“I just got back from the mountains of Kentucky,” he said. “It’s not a recession. It’s a depression out there and I blame one man for this — President Barack Obama.”
Others, such as Rahall, were critical of proposed regulations to limit carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants, but stopped short of pointing the finger directly at the administration.
“You know, where I come from in the heart of West Virginia coal country, if you step across the line in someone else’s backyard and you challenge them to a fight, you stick around and you duke it out,” Rahall said. “We believe in a fair fight. But not this EPA, that’s not what they believe in. This EPA has been throwing regulatory stones, circumventing the Congress and snubbing its nose at the legal process.”
The rally comes as part of a major push this week against the EPA regulations, including draft legislation released by Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., and Manchin to block proposed EPA regulations on greenhouse-gas emissions from new power plants and grant Congress authority to decide when a rule-making for existing plants would take effect. A separate hearing will examine the impact of EPA regulations on coal communities.
What We're Following See More »
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.
Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."
In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."