Jeh Johnson, President Obama’s pick for Homeland Security secretary, is making the rounds on Capitol Hill this week with senators who will decide the fate of his nomination.
Johnson’s nomination was formally sent up to Capitol Hill on Monday, and the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee plans to have a confirmation hearing soon. The former chief lawyer for the Pentagon is expected to be asked a range of questions — from what role he played in authorizing drone strikes to his approach to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an agency within the Homeland Security Department. Senators also plan to ask Johnson about his views on what to do with Guantanamo Bay detainees and his stance on antiterrorism policy, among other topics.
In advance of Johnson’s meeting with committee members, Republicans were wary of prematurely passing judgment Tuesday. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the ranking member on the panel, said he understands that Johnson is widely respected but has several questions waiting for him when they meet Wednesday. “I have a long list of questions that have been sent to him,” he told National Journal. “So we are real early in the stage. He has a real great reputation by everyone I’ve talked to as far as being a man of integrity.”
Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., another committee member, said she plans to meet with Johnson on Wednesday and is focused on several national security issues. “I want to ask him about terrorism policy and Guantanamo and some other issues,” she said. “I want to talk to him about these issues so I haven’t made any judgment yet.”
Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who also serves on the committee, said he is reserving judgment until he learns more about Johnson. “I just don’t know enough about him yet. I prefer to hold off,” he said, adding he hoped to have a chance to talk with Johnson. “We’ll have an opportunity to have a first shot at it.”
Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who does not serve on Homeland Security but is a member of Senate leadership and has raised concerns about drone policy, is slated to meet with Johnson later this week.
Although Republican senators have largely withheld their views on Johnson, there are a few exceptions. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., announced Monday he was planning to put holds on all administration nominees until the public gets to hear from survivors of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, last year.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has said that Johnson will have to answer a litany of questions to show his ability to manage a sprawling department that suffers from low morale, and demonstrate that enforcement of immigration laws will remain free of politics. “This nomination should focus the attention of the Congress and the country on the open refusal of DHS political appointees to impartially execute their law-enforcement mission,” Sessions said in a statement when Johnson was nominated earlier this month.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."