Budget Conference: A Committee of Two?

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 17: Members of the bipartisan budget conference (L-R) Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) discuss their initial meeting at the U.S. Capitol October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC. Congress voted last night to fund the federal budget and increase the nation's debt limit, ending a 16-day government shutdown.
National Journal
Billy House, Stacy Kaper and Elahe Izadi
Billy House Stacy Kaper Elahe Izadi
Oct. 30, 2013, 3:50 p.m.

It’s sup­posed to be a com­mit­tee of 29 sep­ar­ate voices from the House and Sen­ate. But the early sig­nals from the in­aug­ur­al meet­ing of the bi­par­tis­an House and Sen­ate budget con­fer­ence are that it may op­er­ate more like a com­mit­tee of two: Rep. Paul Ry­an and Sen. Patty Mur­ray.

Ry­an said Wed­nes­day that the com­mit­tee won’t be form­ally sit­ting down as a group again un­til Nov. 13 — a fact that seemed to catch even some of the pan­el’s mem­bers by sur­prise. That leaves barely a month be­fore the pan­el’s Dec. 13 dead­line to re­port its re­com­mend­a­tions back to Con­gress.

“That is a huge con­cern to me,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. “The Amer­ic­an people ex­pect us to be get­ting in­to the nitty-gritty, not just giv­ing open­ing state­ments and check­ing out for two weeks.”

Ry­an said the lack of form­al com­mit­tee meet­ings be­fore mid-Novem­ber was be­cause House and Sen­ate sched­ules don’t over­lap un­til then.

But sev­er­al mem­bers of the com­mit­tee, charged with keep­ing the gov­ern­ment fun­ded past Jan. 15 and avoid­ing an­oth­er shut­down, said the weeks between now and Thanks­giv­ing are cru­cial to get­ting work done. Fin­ish­ing be­fore Thanks­giv­ing could al­low more time for the House and Sen­ate to reach agree­ment, and give ap­pro­pri­at­ors time to craft in­di­vidu­al spend­ing bills or a lar­ger om­ni­bus pack­age.

“When you look at the hour­glass “¦ the time between now and Thanks­giv­ing is cru­cial,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

Not that all com­mit­tee mem­bers didn’t get a chance to ex­press them­selves in open­ing state­ments Wed­nes­day. One after the oth­er, they spoke be­fore the cam­er­as, though the meet­ing was largely over­shad­owed by testi­mony tak­ing place else­where over Obama­care. Their state­ments were marked by words like “to­geth­er” and “com­prom­ise” and “agree.”

Yet the two cham­bers are still sharply di­vided on the is­sues, such as new tax rev­en­ues and changes to en­ti­tle­ment pro­grams like Medi­care and So­cial Se­cur­ity.

The no­tion of a “grand bar­gain” that could tackle changes to en­ti­tle­ments, over­haul the tax code, and cut tril­lions from the na­tion­al debt is be­ing down­played as highly un­likely, something both Ry­an and Mur­ray in­dic­ated in their open­ing state­ments and be­fore.

In­stead, the fo­cus is on find­ing some way to soften the next round of se­quester cuts and for­ging a spend­ing plan through Sept. 30, 2014 (the rest of the cur­rent fisc­al year) that would go bey­ond simply ex­tend­ing ex­ist­ing fund­ing levels.

“Nobody has to aban­don their prin­ciples,” said Ry­an, the House Budget Com­mit­tee chair­man. “In­stead, we need to find out where our prin­ciples over­lap. We won’t solve all our prob­lems “¦ so let’s fo­cus on achiev­able goals. Let’s find com­mon ground.”

Mur­ray, the Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee chair, said, “This won’t be easy — the House and Sen­ate budgets are very dif­fer­ent even for just this year. But if both sides are will­ing to move out of their par­tis­an corners and of­fer up some com­prom­ises, I am con­fid­ent it can be done.”

Mur­ray said the com­mit­tee will be work­ing between now and the next con­fer­ence meet­ing. “Ob­vi­ously we all need to get it done fairly quickly. The time is very short,” she said.

But with no plans now to meet again un­til Nov. 13 — and pres­sure to de­liv­er pro­gress by Thanks­giv­ing — it ap­pears evid­ent that not all 29 mem­bers of the com­mit­tee will be in­stru­ment­al in the real ne­go­ti­ations.

Budget ex­perts, in­clud­ing Steve Pruitt, a former House Budget Com­mit­tee Demo­crat­ic staff dir­ect­or, say most of the work of House and Sen­ate con­fer­ences—es­pe­cially a budget con­fer­ence—typ­ic­ally gets done in private dis­cus­sions between the House and Sen­ate chairs, the rank­ing mem­bers, and at the staff level.

“That’s where the pro­gress will be — in the private con­ver­sa­tions,” said Sen. Bill Nel­son, D-Fla. “You’ll have some para­met­ers by then. Then you’ve got an­oth­er month to fi­nal­ize it. “

Merkley ac­know­ledged that budget lead­ers are pre­par­ing for con­ver­sa­tions be­hind the scenes but ar­gued that provides lim­ited op­por­tun­ity to work to­geth­er. “I’m sure that is cer­tainly part of it,” he said. “But maybe hav­ing reg­u­lar pub­lic gath­er­ings would also help drive more speed be­hind the scenes.”

Sen. Chuck Grass­ley, R-Iowa, told his col­leagues in a state­ment, “The de­lib­er­a­tions and deal-mak­ing shouldn’t be done in the dead of night in a back­room with only a small hand­ful of in­di­vidu­als.”

Grass­ley said some of the pub­lic cyn­icism re­gard­ing Wash­ing­ton “comes from the fact that many of the re­cent budget deals have been con­cocted in a back of­fice by a few lead­ers, and rank and file mem­bers were left to take it or leave it. They wer­en’t de­bated. There was no de­lib­er­a­tion. And nearly no one had an op­por­tun­ity be­fore­hand to even read them.”

Whatever emerges will re­quire the ap­prov­al of ma­jor­ity of the com­mit­tee’s mem­bers be­fore it can be sent as a re­com­mend­a­tion to the full House and Sen­ate.

Mean­while, Wed­nes­day’s open­ing hear­ing did little to re­set what have been re­l­at­ively low ex­pect­a­tions be­fore the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee ever gaveled in. Ry­an has said he is not seek­ing a grand bar­gain, and Demo­crats have fur­ther lowered the bar for suc­cess in re­cent days by mak­ing clear they are fo­cused on try­ing to find a budget agree­ment for fisc­al 2014 — not one that ex­tends for 10 years — and find­ing an al­tern­at­ive to the se­quester cuts.

Some con­fer­ence mem­bers said they would con­sider even small achieve­ments ma­jor vic­tor­ies in the cur­rent en­vir­on­ment.

“Let’s get some of our more im­me­di­ate is­sues re­solved,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho. “Let’s lay some found­a­tion and some pro­gress for mov­ing to­wards the big­ger solu­tions. I think there is a little dif­fer­ent ex­pect­a­tion this time and hope­fully it’s one where we can be suc­cess­ful.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×