Farm Bill Conference Begins With Members Determined to ‘Show How to Govern’

WASHINGTON - JUNE 22: Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) participates in a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on June 22, 2010 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on policies that would reduce oil consumption through the promotion of accelerated deployment of electric-drive vehicles. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
National Journal
Jerry Hagstrom
Oct. 30, 2013, 3:53 p.m.

House and Sen­ate farm bill con­fer­ees used the first and pos­sibly only pub­lic meet­ing Wed­nes­day to once again ar­tic­u­late their dif­fer­ences on ag­ri­cul­ture and nu­tri­tion policy, but the tone was con­cili­at­ory and con­gres­sion­al farm lead­ers made plans to con­tin­ue ne­go­ti­ations next week even though the House is out of ses­sion.

House Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Frank Lu­cas, R-Okla., and rank­ing mem­ber Col­lin Peterson, D-Minn., and Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and rank­ing mem­ber Thad Co­chran, R-Miss., all ex­pressed hope that the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee will be able to keep con­trol of the farm bill and fin­ish it this year.

“We face daunt­ing chal­lenges, we are work­ing in a com­plic­ated en­vir­on­ment, we have to draft a very tech­nic­al bill,” Lu­cas said, but he ad­ded that the com­mit­tee has the re­spons­ib­il­ity “to give people back home the tools to with­stand the forces of nature and the mar­kets” and to as­sist in “the struggle” that many Amer­ic­ans face as food con­sumers.

Stabenow noted that the con­fer­ence provides “an un­pre­ced­en­ted op­por­tun­ity to show how to gov­ern,” and many of the oth­er 40 mem­bers of the con­fer­ence ex­pressed the same view dur­ing a two-hour-plus ses­sion at which all the con­fer­ees had an op­por­tun­ity to make open­ing state­ments.

There have been con­cerns that the farm bill, which has been pending for two years, might be taken over by the lar­ger budget ne­go­ti­ations, but Stabenow, who is also serving on that con­fer­ence com­mit­tee, said, “The Budget Com­mit­tee will not be writ­ing the farm bill. We will write, we will edit, we will of­fer re­spons­ible cuts.”

Lu­cas said budget ne­go­ti­at­ors are wel­come to use the farm-bill sav­ings in their cal­cu­la­tions but ad­ded, “You can’t have our money if you don’t take our policy.”

Mem­bers re­peated their well-doc­u­mented views on farm policy, but one new piece of in­form­a­tion emerged when Stabenow noted that on Fri­day the ex­pir­a­tion of spe­cial Re­cov­ery Act food-stamp be­ne­fits will res­ult in sav­ings that will total $11 bil­lion over the next three years.

Stabenow said the $11 bil­lion cut could be used to help forge a com­prom­ise on the fund­ing level for the Sup­ple­ment­al Nu­tri­tion As­sist­ance Pro­gram, the of­fi­cial name for food stamps. The Sen­ate’s farm bill would re­duce SNAP spend­ing by $4 bil­lion over 10 years while the House bill would cut food stamps by $39 bil­lion over the same peri­od.

“That $11 bil­lion plus the $4 bil­lion in cuts in the Sen­ate bill mean that ac­cept­ing the Sen­ate nu­tri­tion title would res­ult in a total of $15 bil­lion in cuts in nu­tri­tion,” Stabenow said. She ad­ded that “the good news” is that the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice has pro­jec­ted that “over 14 mil­lion people will no longer need tem­por­ary food help over the next few years be­cause the eco­nomy is im­prov­ing and they will be able to go back to work.”

Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who chairs the House Ag­ri­cul­ture sub­com­mit­tee in charge of nu­tri­tion, said he be­lieves waste, fraud, and ab­use should be elim­in­ated in food stamps, but that he was in­trigued by the in­form­a­tion that Stabenow provided.

Rep. Steve South­er­land, R-Fla. — who wrote the food-stamp work re­quire­ment amend­ment that House Re­pub­lic­ans ad­op­ted on the floor even though it of­fen­ded Demo­crats, and was the House Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship’s ap­pointee to the con­fer­ence — noted that he was the only Flor­idi­an on the con­fer­ence com­mit­tee and spent most of his time talk­ing about the needs of Flor­ida farm­ers. South­er­land noted, however, that he con­sidered his amend­ment “com­mon­sense” re­form.

Rep. Mar­cia Fudge, D-Ohio, the chair­wo­man of the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus who was ap­poin­ted to the con­fer­ence by House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal­if., to de­fend food stamps, said she wants to con­vince the con­fer­ence to “ac­cept the link between farm­ing and feed­ing.” Fudge also said she is as con­cerned about the size of the cut for food stamps in the House pro­pos­al as she is about the fact that the bill would au­thor­ize nu­tri­tion pro­grams for only three years while farm pro­grams are au­thor­ized for five. But Fudge also said she looks for­ward to a “col­lab­or­at­ive con­clu­sion.”

Co­chran, who once served in the House, said he was im­pressed by “how very well be­haved” the House mem­bers were and said they spoke on be­half of farm­ers and people in need “in a very mean­ing­ful way.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×