Obamacare Insurance Choices Shrink for Individual Buyers in New Hampshire

MANCHESTER, NH - AUGUST 20: People watch as Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney speaks during a campaign stop at Saint Anselm College on August 20, 2012 in Manchester, New Hampshire. Romney and and his vice presidential candidate U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), held the town hall-style event just two days after President Barack Obama made campaign stops in New Hampshire. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Oct. 31, 2013, 4:06 p.m.

In the new health in­sur­ance mar­ket­places cre­ated by the Af­ford­able Care Act, 95 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans will have at least two in­sur­ance com­pan­ies from which to com­pare and se­lect plans, ac­cord­ing to a Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment ana­lys­is.

But that also means 5 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans — in­clud­ing all res­id­ents of New Hamp­shire and West Vir­gin­ia — will not have a choice.

An­them Blue Cross and Blue Shield is the only in­sur­ance com­pany par­ti­cip­at­ing in New Hamp­shire’s ex­change. “The leg­acy of our com­pany has been to par­ti­cip­ate ag­gress­ively in the state,” said An­them spokes­man Chris Dugan.

An­them cov­ers ap­prox­im­ately 80 per­cent of res­id­ents pur­chas­ing plans on the state’s ex­ist­ing in­di­vidu­al mar­ket, said Tyler Brannen, a health policy ana­lyst at the New Hamp­shire In­sur­ance De­part­ment. Be­cause of New Hamp­shire’s small pop­u­la­tion, the fin­an­cial re­turns of an­oth­er in­sur­ance com­pany of­fer­ing com­pet­ing policies in the state would not be as great as in an urb­an mar­ket.

“Any oth­er car­ri­er would have to weigh the risk,” Brannen said.

An­them is of­fer­ing 11 plans on the ex­change, with monthly premi­um con­tri­bu­tions ran­ging from $177 to $1,784 be­fore tax sub­sidies. One big change An­them is mak­ing to its cov­er­age is the num­ber of doc­tors and hos­pit­als in­cluded in its in­sur­ance net­work.

“By part­ner­ing with cer­tain pro­viders, we are provid­ing a product that is 25 per­cent lower than it would be by us­ing a broad­er net­work,” Dugan said.

There is a down­side, though. The shift elim­in­ates 10 of the 26 ma­jor hos­pit­als in New Hamp­shire from the An­them net­work for people who cur­rently pur­chase An­them in­sur­ance on the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket and will shift to An­them’s ACA ex­change mar­ket next year, Brannen said.

Dugan was not sure if An­them would con­tin­ue to of­fer plans in the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket, in ad­di­tion to its ex­change mar­ket op­tions. Re­gard­less of what An­them does, Brannen said, he ex­pects the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket will phase out.

“To the ex­tent that people may qual­i­fy for a sub­sidy,” Brannen said, “I can’t think of any reas­on to pur­chase products from An­them out­side of the ex­change.”

Con­sumers are frus­trated and see the changes as a loss, Brannen said, es­pe­cially be­cause they don’t have an al­tern­at­ive to An­them.

But the use of nar­row net­works to drive down the cost of health in­sur­ance isn’t just a func­tion of the An­them mono­poly — it’s a na­tion­wide trend. A re­cent study from the Health Re­search In­sti­tute at Price­wa­ter­house­Coopers found that 69 per­cent of in­surers re­por­ted nar­row-net­work con­tracts.

Next year, some people could have to drive as far as 45 minutes to see an in-net­work doc­tor, Brannen said. But that doesn’t vi­ol­ate the state’s ad­equacy stand­ards that reg­u­late pro­vider dis­tance in in­sur­ance plans, he ad­ded.

Rais­ing those stand­ards could be the next task for poli­cy­makers, he sug­ges­ted, as voters enter the ex­change and come to terms with the real­it­ies of their new cov­er­age.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
13 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×