Legislation Would Crack Down on Physician Self-Referrals

None

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - MAY 19: U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood (L) and U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) speak to reporters after touring a Pacific Gas and Electric gas line replacement construction site with on May 19, 2011 in San Francisco, California. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier toured the San Bruno gas explosion site and a construction site where gas lines are being replaced. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
Nov. 3, 2013, 7:29 a.m.

A new study shows a sharp in­crease in the use of in­tens­ity-mod­u­lated ra­di­ation ther­apy to treat pro­state can­cer when the doc­tor be­ne­fits fin­an­cially through self-re­fer­ral, and a House bill aims to crack down on such profit-driv­en health care prac­tices.

The study, pub­lished last week in the New Eng­land Journ­al of Medi­cine, found a 146 per­cent in­crease in IM­RT ser­vices among uro­lo­gists who self-refer. Com­par­ing Medi­care claims between 2005 and 2010, there was a 19.2 per­cent in­crease in IM­RT use among self-re­fer­ring groups once they be­came self-re­fer­rers, versus a 1.3 per­cent in­crease among phys­i­cians who did not self-refer.

The phys­i­cian self-re­fer­ral law, called the Stark Law, pro­hib­its phys­i­cians from mak­ing re­fer­rals for cer­tain health ser­vices covered by Medi­care to en­tit­ies with whom they have a fin­an­cial re­la­tion­ship. Yet the law has an ex­cep­tion for “in-of­fice an­cil­lary ser­vices,” which in­cludes ra­di­ation ther­apy.

However, IM­RT is not al­ways the best treat­ment for pro­state can­cer as far as cost or health, and can ac­tu­ally be harm­ful to older be­ne­fi­ciar­ies, ac­cord­ing to the au­thor of the study, eco­nom­ist Jean Mitchell, a pro­fess­or at the Mc­Court School of Pub­lic Policy at Geor­getown Uni­versity.

Mitchell says the an­cil­lary-ser­vices ex­cep­tion has res­ul­ted in a grow­ing num­ber of uro­logy groups gain­ing own­er­ship of IM­RT ser­vices.

“[The ex­cep­tion] en­ables phys­i­cians and phys­i­cian groups to in­cor­por­ate des­ig­nated health ser­vices — in­clud­ing ra­di­ation ser­vices — in­to their prac­tice without vi­ol­at­ing the law,” she said. “This self-re­fer­ral ar­range­ment is linked to in­creased use of health ser­vices and also health care spend­ing, with no clear be­ne­fit to pa­tients.”

Rep. Jack­ie Spei­er, D-Cal­if., in­tro­duced a bill in Au­gust along with Rep. Jim Mc­Der­mott, D-Wash., and Dina Tit­us, D-Nev., called the “Pro­mot­ing In­teg­rity in Medi­care Act of 2013” to ad­dress this is­sue. The bill would pro­hib­it self-re­fer­ral for ra­di­ation ther­apy, ad­vanced ima­ging, ana­tom­ic patho­logy, and phys­ic­al ther­apy.

“This is un­ne­ces­sary, in­ap­pro­pri­ate, and in some cases even harm­ful treat­ments or ser­vices,” Spei­er said. “This is not about bet­ter care and not about pa­tient con­veni­ence, it’s really about mak­ing a buck.”

The study has re­ceived push­back from some uro­logy as­so­ci­ations, in­clud­ing the Amer­ic­an Uro­lo­gic­al As­so­ci­ation and Large Uro­logy Group Prac­tice As­so­ci­ation.

“The AUA is com­mit­ted to en­sur­ing the de­liv­ery of ap­pro­pri­ate, high-qual­ity health care to men with pro­state can­cer and wel­comes the op­por­tun­ity to dis­cuss these is­sues in a con­struct­ive man­ner. Un­for­tu­nately, giv­en its in­her­ent bi­ases and flawed meth­od­o­lo­gies, Dr. Mitchell’s art­icle does not con­trib­ute to the dis­course,” the or­gan­iz­a­tion wrote in a state­ment.

AUA de­clined to of­fer fur­ther com­ment.

Ac­cord­ing to Spei­er’s of­fice, she is build­ing sup­port for the bill, though some res­ist­ance has come from doc­tors who cur­rently be­ne­fit from self-re­fer­ral. It re­mains un­clear if or when it will get a hear­ing as a stan­dalone bill, but Spei­er sees it as a po­ten­tial sus­tain­able growth rate pay-for. This would mean at­tach­ing it to per­man­ent “doc fix” le­gis­la­tion, so the Medi­care sav­ings from her bill would go to­ward cov­er­ing those costs. Le­gis­la­tion to per­man­ently re­peal the SGR has broad bi­par­tis­an sup­port, though how to pay for it re­mains un­cer­tain.

Spei­er says her bill would re­store the ori­gin­al in­tent of the Spark Law. “I’m hop­ing this study draws spe­cif­ic at­ten­tion to my col­leagues that something needs to be done,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
‘PULLING A TRUMP’
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Source:
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
×