Poverty Is Stamped Into DNA in Childhood — And Stays There

A poorer upbringing increases people’s susceptibility to colds later in life, something they can’t shake even if they climb the socioeconomic ladder.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Nov. 5, 2013, 9:04 a.m.

Poverty, it turns out, is etched in­to our DNA.

“For each de­crease of one year in par­ent­al home own­er­ship, the par­ti­cipants’ odds of de­vel­op­ing a cold in­creased by ap­prox­im­ately 9 per­cent.”

That’s not a meta­phor­ic­al state­ment. Grow­ing up poor leaves a per­man­ent mark on our per­man­ent ge­net­ic code, ac­cord­ing to new re­search.

So­cioeco­nom­ic status dur­ing child­hood cor­rel­ates with short­er sec­tions of DNA, known as te­lomeres, later in life, ex­plains a study pub­lished in the Novem­ber is­sue of the journ­al Brain, Be­ha­vi­or, and Im­munity. Te­lomeres are the caps to a strand of DNA and, like a case cov­er­ing an ex­tern­al hard drive, they pro­tect the in­tern­al data from cor­ro­sion. Without get­ting too deep in­to the sci­ence, the length of the te­lomere is a rough in­dic­at­or of the age and health of a hu­man cell. Every time a cell splits in­to two, the te­lomere is slightly shortened. So DNA de­grades as it di­vides. It’s a com­pon­ent of hu­man aging. It’s also the reas­on why cloned an­im­als like Dolly the sheep don’t live as long as the ori­gin­als — you make a baby an­im­al with old DNA, and it ages faster.

More broadly, the te­lomere “is a mark­er of the func­tion­al­ity of cer­tain im­mune cells,” lead re­search­er Shel­don Co­hen says. “The short­er these te­lomeres, the less func­tion­al these im­mune cells are. ” And some­how poverty is in­scrib­ing it­self on the code of man­kind.

Co­hen’s study found that for each year a per­son spent liv­ing in a home their par­ents didn’t own (a rough, yet re­l­at­ively re­li­able in­dic­at­or of so­cioeco­nom­ic status), the te­lomere length de­creased by 5 per­cent.

And what can be seen un­der the mi­cro­scope is re­flec­ted in daily life. In the study, par­ti­cipants were asked to take a dose of a cold vir­us (ap­par­ently, to get people to agree to get sick for sci­ence, you have to of­fer them $1,000 for their ef­forts). Those who in­dic­ated a lower so­cioeco­nom­ic status as a child were more likely to be in­fec­ted by the vir­us and show symp­toms. “For each de­crease of one year in par­ent­al home own­er­ship, the par­ti­cipants’ odds of de­vel­op­ing a cold in­creased by ap­prox­im­ately 9 per­cent,” the study con­cluded.

Co­hen ex­plains that in re­search re­gard­ing cold out­comes, sci­ent­ists must meas­ure wheth­er a per­son was in­fec­ted by the dis­ease in the first place, and then meas­ure that per­son’s im­mune re­sponse to the dis­ease. It’s rare for both sys­tems to be af­fected by the same vari­able (in this case, eco­nom­ic status), Co­hen says. But that’s what is hap­pen­ing here.

“And we vir­tu­ally nev­er find that,” Co­hen says.

Co­hen says the re­search hasn’t found any­thing more spe­cif­ic than so­cioeco­nom­ic status dur­ing child­hood to cor­rel­ate with these health out­comes. That is, he and his team tried to con­trol for factors like di­vorce, home sta­bil­ity, the like­li­hood of people of low so­cioeco­nom­ic status smoking or drink­ing later in life, body mass in­dex, and so on. No oth­er vari­able cor­rel­ated with de­creased te­lomere length or cold out­comes.

There are many ways poverty could af­fect the hu­man body — lim­ited ac­cess to health care, a more stress­ful home en­vir­on­ment, a more vi­ol­ent neigh­bor­hood, and poorer nu­tri­tion can all lead to poor health out­comes. “Whatever it is,” Co­hen says of the ex­act mech­an­ism, “it is hav­ing a big ef­fect and it is hav­ing a broad ef­fect on the bio­lo­gic­al sys­tem.” And im­prov­ing someone’s place­ment on the so­cioeco­nom­ic lad­der would not re­verse the changes chil­dren low on the rungs ex­per­i­enced while grow­ing up. The ef­fects held no mat­ter how well-off people be­came in adult­hood.

A 2009 study from the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health found that psy­cho­lo­gic­al stress and trauma in youth can trans­late to lower te­lomere length later on. “Both emo­tion­al neg­lect and phys­ic­al neg­lect were linked to short­er te­lomeres,” the pa­per con­cluded, “thus it is pos­sible that in ad­di­tion to the psy­cho­lo­gic­al ef­fects of stress, phys­ic­al stressors such as in­ad­equate nu­tri­tion or ill­ness con­trib­uted to the find­ings.”

If all this seems kind of bleak — that poor chil­dren have a bio­lo­gic­al in­equal­ity etched in­to their cells that they can’t get rid of — well, it is — for now. Co­hen calls the data pre­lim­in­ary, and his re­search field will work in the fu­ture to de­term­ine which vari­ables, if any, vari­able can in­ter­vene in the pro­cess. (Oth­er re­search­ers work­ing on this ques­tion have found in­con­clus­ive evid­ence that so­cioeco­nom­ic status de­creased te­lomere length — though that study didn’t use par­ent­al home own­er­ship as its self-se­lect­ing vari­able.)

While DNA provides the frame­work to our lives, our ex­per­i­ences can dic­tate how that frame fills in. Take lan­guage learn­ing as a sim­il­ar concept. There’s the oft-re­por­ted “30 mil­lion word gap” study, which found that chil­dren in wealth­i­er homes know hun­dreds more words than chil­dren grow­ing up in fam­il­ies that re­ceive wel­fare be­ne­fits. This dis­con­nect causes a gap in lan­guage and learn­ing de­vel­op­ment that widens fur­ther when chil­dren start school.

The lan­guage ac­quis­i­tion is a dif­fer­ent pro­cess, but it tells a sim­il­ar story about the im­pact of en­vir­on­ment.

Co­hen sums it up: “Tra­ject­or­ies are set in child­hood and at least are not eas­ily sus­cept­ible for change.”

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×