Pete Sessions Hands Dems the Perfect Attack

This House leader just gave Democrats all the hyperbole they need to go after Republicans — the script writes itself.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Nov. 6, 2013, 6:28 a.m.

It’s no Mitch Mc­Con­nell mo­ment, but House Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions just gave Demo­crats some cause for cel­eb­ra­tion. In an in­ter­view pub­lished Tues­day, the Texas Re­pub­lic­an, who plays an im­port­ant role in how le­gis­lat­ively pro­duct­ive Con­gress can be, drove home what Demo­crats have long said about the GOP: The party has no in­terest in gov­ern­ing.

“Everything we do in this body should be about mes­saging to win back the Sen­ate,” Ses­sions said in an un­for­tu­nate in­ter­view with Roll Call.

“That’s it. If you don’t want Benghazis to hap­pen or you want an in­vest­ig­a­tion for Benghazi, if you want an in­vest­ig­a­tion on the IRS as op­posed to the ex­cuses that [Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er] Harry Re­id is all about, if you do not like what’s hap­pen­ing at the [Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency], then you gain the Sen­ate,” he ad­ded.

Pre­pare to see those re­marks quoted and re­quoted in scores of press re­leases and Demo­crat­ic at­tack ads between now and the end of the year. Per­haps they’ll start with a stark por­trait of Ses­sions’s face, which creepily fades creepily to black, fol­lowed by bright-red block let­ters, “The GOP has no in­terest in gov­ern­ing … just ask House Rules Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pete Ses­sions. “

The re­mark is re­min­is­cent of Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mc­Con­nell’s fam­ous line about how the GOP’s “top polit­ic­al pri­or­ity” should be deny­ing Pres­id­ent Obama a second term. Mc­Con­nell’s com­ment was fod­der for scores of polit­ic­al at­tack ads and Demo­crat­ic press re­leases at the time. And with good reas­on.

The gaffes fall in­to a par­tic­u­lar sub­cat­egory known as a Kins­ley gaffe. “A gaffe is when a politi­cian tells the truth — some ob­vi­ous truth he isn’t sup­posed to say,” polit­ic­al com­ment­at­or Mi­chael Kins­ley once ob­served. That is what gives it its power.

Yet to some con­ser­vat­ives, Ses­sions’s line is not a gaffe at all. There is a le­git­im­ate con­ser­vat­ive base that would like to see Re­pub­lic­ans ne­go­ti­ate on noth­ing. Dur­ing the shut­down fight, for in­stance, the cofounder of Tea Party Pat­ri­ots trum­peted the “glor­i­ous battle” fought by “com­mit­ted war­ri­or[s]” that put Re­pub­lic­ans “poised for massive gains in 2014.”

If that’s Re­pub­lic­an think­ing, it has Dems rub­bing their hands to­geth­er. Asked Wed­nes­day morn­ing wheth­er Ses­sions’s re­marks would make for at­tack-ad fod­der, a Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee spokes­wo­man wrote back hap­pily. “House Re­pub­lic­ans’ agenda has nev­er been about gov­ern­ing—they’re more in­ter­est­ing in play­ing polit­ic­al games, while Demo­crats are fo­cused on solv­ing prob­lems and cre­at­ing a strong middle class,” said Emily Bittner. A Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee spokes­man wrote back with­in minutes. “In short, yes — Ses­sions ar­tic­u­lated what their strategy is — it’s not about the is­sues, it’s about try­ing to score polit­ic­al points, and folks aren’t buy­ing it as we saw in VA last night,” said Mi­chael Czin.

In fact, the DNC blas­ted out a press re­leases Tues­day night, say­ing Ses­sions’s com­ments lay out what House Re­pub­lic­ans’ No. 1 goal is: to use their House ma­jor­ity to play polit­ics in the hopes of win­ning the Sen­ate. “Ses­sions’s com­ments are noth­ing short of cyn­ic­al, but un­for­tu­nately this is a view that has be­come dom­in­ant in today’s GOP. Re­pub­lic­ans are sin­gu­larly fo­cused on play­ing polit­ics, and they have little or no re­gard for the mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans who are hurt by their ac­tions,” the DNC wrote in its re­lease.

There’s some truth to the claim. Last month, Czin noted, the GOP-led shut­down cost the eco­nomy $24 bil­lion. The party has voted 43 times to try to re­peal Obama­care, and some law­makers are act­ively set­ting up road­b­locks to pre­vent their con­stitu­ents from sign­ing up for care. Next week Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, who is be­ing pil­lor­ied by con­ser­vat­ive press for not tak­ing a more tea-party-like op­pos­i­tion­ist role in the debt-ceil­ing show­down, will in­tro­duce a 20-week abor­tion ban that’s purely for show. As Aman­da Mar­cotte notes over at Slate, Pres­id­ent Obama has zero reas­on not to veto it with haste if it ac­tu­ally gets to him. Not that it will, as Re­id has every in­cent­ive to kill it be­fore it even gets to the Sen­ate floor.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×