A few weeks ago, President Obama defended his signature health care law as “more than a website”; now lawmakers on both sides are increasingly taking this position as well.
Senate hearings this week showed both parties shifting their Obamacare narratives beyond the rocky rollout of the enrollment website to how the law itself will work more broadly.
“Before we get into the details, I think everyone should take a deep breath,” Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said Tuesday at the hearing with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Marilyn Tavenner. “This is, after all, a website. This is a machine that will be fixed.”
Democrats expressing confidence that the website will be fixed is not surprising, but Republicans are notably assuming the same.
“I’m sure you’ll be able to fix the website,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.
Both sides remain concerned, but in the grand scheme, two months of website problems — assuming it is running successfully by the end of November — are less important than how the law operates once the website is no longer standing in its way.
On that point, however, lawmakers remain as polarized as ever.
“What I’m more concerned about,” Alexander continued, “are the canceled policies and the inability of people to have time, after you presumably fix the website by the end of November, to replace their policies by Jan. 1 so they’ll actually have health insurance.”
For Republicans, concerns like insurance-policy cancellations and premium increases are indicative of larger problems with the law that need to be addressed.
“The website’s not working? Fine, let’s fix it,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, at a Senate Finance Committee hearing Wednesday with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. “But the law is not working. Isn’t it time for a timeout so that we can go in and start finding out why we are seeing premiums go up, not down; why we are seeing people canceled, not being protected in their health care; why we are seeing the failure of the promised operation of the law to occur.”
Democrats’ concerns, on the other hand, are more focused on missed outreach and enrollment.
“What, in your view, Madam Secretary, could Democratic and Republican senators here on the Finance Committee do to make the latest health reforms a success the way the Medicare prescription-drug program has been?” asked Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore. The senator drew an oft-made comparison to the now revered Medicare Part D Program that had a notoriously rough start as well.
“I think that it is always welcome to have elected officials in their home states give information to constituents about what the law says, what their options are, what their benefits could be, what choices they have and how to access the process,” Sebelius responded.
There is still much work to be done to fix the website this month. “I would say there are a couple of hundred functional fixes that have been identified,” Sebelius said. “It’s a pretty aggressive schedule to get to the entire punch list by the end of November.”
Yet as improvements continue to be made, lawmakers are increasingly moving beyond HealthCare.gov, and looking forward in terms of implementation of the law.
“Months ago I warned that if the implementation didn’t improve, the marketplaces might struggle,” said Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., of the infamous “train wreck” quote. “We heard multiple times that everything was on track. We now know that was not the case. But that’s in the past. Now it’s time to more forward to figure out how to fix it.”
- 1 High Court Vacancy Spells Trouble for Congress
- 2 The Winners and Losers From the South Carolina Republican Debate
- 3 Why Four Justices Were Against the Supreme Court’s Huge Gay-Marriage Decision
- 4 Democrats’ Vanishing Future
- 5 FBI’s Facial-Recognition Technology Has Achieved ‘Full Operational Capability’
What We're Following See More »
Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”
“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.