Is Colorado Turning Away From Democrats?

President Obama carried the state twice. But there are fresh signs of a growing backlash.

Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper speaks during day two of the Democratic National Convention at Time Warner Cable Arena on September 5, 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
Nov. 11, 2013, 4:46 a.m.

Col­or­ado is back as a na­tion­al bell­weth­er.

Earli­er this year, a Demo­crat­ic-led push to en­act stricter gun-con­trol meas­ures cost two state sen­at­ors their jobs and tar­nished once-pop­u­lar Gov. John Hick­en­loop­er’s bi­par­tis­an sheen. Last week, voters over­whelm­ingly re­jec­ted a sweep­ing meas­ure to raise the state’s in­come tax. And now, Hick­en­loop­er is in a fight with some of his core sup­port­ers over a ban on a pro­cess of nat­ur­al-gas drilling known as “frack­ing.” As Den­ver-area Fox31 News re­por­ted Fri­day, three mu­ni­cip­al­it­ies last week voted to ban frack­ing with­in their lim­its, a de­cision the gov­ernor has pre­vi­ously sued to stop.

Taken to­geth­er, the moves are a course cor­rec­tion for a state that seemed to be drift­ing in­ex­or­ably to the left. And they’ve caught the at­ten­tion of the Demo­crats up for reelec­tion in 2014, Hick­en­loop­er and Sen. Mark Ud­all, both of whom have be­gun plot­ting their own paths back to­ward the polit­ic­al cen­ter.

Col­or­ado had leaned right only a dec­ade ago, when Pres­id­ent George W. Bush won it by a re­l­at­ively com­fort­able 4-point mar­gin. But driv­en by a boom­ing pop­u­la­tion of His­pan­ics and highly edu­cated whites, the Centen­ni­al State voted de­cis­ively for Pres­id­ent Obama in 2008 and 2012. Its three ma­jor statewide of­fice hold­ers, Hick­en­loop­er and Sens. Mark Ud­all and Mi­chael Ben­net, are all Demo­crats, the lat­ter of whom sur­vived reelec­tion in the Re­pub­lic­an wave of 2010.

But voters are less en­thu­si­ast­ic about the party now. The gov­ernor’s ap­prov­al rat­ing was a luke­warm 48 per­cent in Au­gust, ac­cord­ing to a poll from Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity, and a plur­al­ity of voters said he did not de­serve reelec­tion. Their dis­ap­prov­al of­fers a polit­ic­al ex­plan­a­tion for Hick­en­loop­er’s sup­port for frack­ing, which has broad sup­port from most voters but is de­rided by some en­vir­on­ment­al­ists as un­safe. Back­ing it al­lows the gov­ernor, a former geo­lo­gist, to re­cap­ture some of the middle ground lost dur­ing his sup­port for gun-con­trol meas­ures.

“The frack­ing is­sue cer­tainly com­plic­ates Hick­en­loop­er’s polit­ic­al for­tunes,” polit­ic­al ana­lyst Eric Son­der­mann, told Fox31 News. “He has staked out some in­de­pend­ent ground — to his cred­it, in my es­tim­a­tion — but it does pit him against a whole lot of his lib­er­al, en­vir­on­ment­al, Demo­crat­ic base.”

Ud­all, whose own ap­prov­al rat­ing is com­par­at­ively bet­ter off than Hick­en­loop­er’s, has been among the earli­est and most ag­gress­ive sen­at­ors to ask Obama ex­tend the Obama­care en­roll­ment peri­od. He and a group of Demo­crats — in­clud­ing Ben­net, now chair­man of the Demo­crat­ic Sen­at­ori­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee — met with the pres­id­ent last week to voice their con­cerns with the health care law’s botched rol­lout.

Both men are keenly aware the state’s polit­ic­al cli­mate is volat­ile enough to push them out of the of­fice. But so far, they’ve also caught a key break: Neither has a top-tier Re­pub­lic­an op­pon­ent. Ud­all, who has more than $4 mil­lion in the bank, has drawn a mot­ley group of foes, in­clud­ing 2010 GOP nom­in­ee Ken Buck, the dis­trict at­tor­ney who in­fam­ously com­pared ho­mo­sexu­al­ity to al­co­hol­ism dur­ing a de­bate against Ben­net.

Hick­en­looop­er, mean­while, could face former Rep. Tom Tan­credo, the anti-il­leg­al-im­mig­ra­tion lead­er.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×