As the Environmental Protection Agency readies next year’s renewable-fuel standard, both biofuels producers and gasoline refiners are poised to pounce. No matter where EPA sets the volume requirements for ethanol and other biofuel blends in 2014, the standard is going to face push-back.
“Groups within the biofuel industry are fully committed to challenging the rule in court if the EPA changes how it implements the standard,” said Paul Winters, communications director for the Biotechnology Industry Organization. “We want to see the targets continue to be set at the highest-achievable level.”
The biofuels industry is concerned about the 2014 standard because a leaked draft of the proposal showed the agency might reduce the target for renewable fuels from the statutory requirement of 18.15 billion gallons to 15.21 billion gallons next year.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy emphasized in a statement last month that no decisions would be made until all stakeholders had an opportunity to provide input, but the leaked draft made many ethanol producers nervous.
“Having seen the leaked draft, we’ve begun to focus on how it would send a chilling signal about future investment in the industry,” Michael McAdams, president of the Advanced Biofuels Association, told National Journal Daily. Association members took their concerns to the White House Office of Management and Budget, which must sign off on EPA’s proposal before it is released, possibly as early as Tuesday.
If the final proposal mimics the draft, biofuels producers are threatening swift retaliation. “We will consider every possible avenue available to change the rule,” McAdams said. “We plan to take our message wherever we need to so that we can try and compel a different set of numbers than the ones we’ve already seen.”
The oil industry also is ready to respond if it considers the target too high.
“If the draft is accurate and the proposal mirrors that, we think that EPA would be on the right track, but we think that they should go further to lower the ethanol requirements,” said Bob Greco, the American Petroleum Institute’s downstream group director.
The numbers in the leaked draft would set ethanol requirements at somewhere between 9.8 percent and 10 percent of the total fuel supply for 2014, Greco said. This could mean that the blend wall — the point at which the amount of ethanol mixed with gasoline exceeds 10 percent — is reached. API contends that this could cause a host of problems, including damage to car engines, although biofuels producers say the claim is exaggerated.
“Once we see the proposal we’ll submit comments, testify at hearings, and continue to talk to EPA about why the requirements should be lowered,” Greco said.
Oil- and gas-industry stakeholders also note that while a lower renewable-fuel standard would be a minor victory, the real prize for them would be repeal of the mandate. For that, they have their sights set on Congress.
“This is still just a Band-Aid cure for a longer-term problem,” said Charles Drevna, president of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. “What EPA is doing is triage, and this patient needs to be delivered to Congress.”
A bill to eliminate the standard’s corn-based ethanol requirements — sponsored by Reps. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., Jim Costa, D-Calif., Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Steve Womack, R-Ark. — is pending in the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
What We're Following See More »
"On Wednesday afternoon, Rep. Eric Swalwell, (D-Calif.), a Democrat on the House intelligence committee, and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the senior Democrat on the House government oversight committee, announced they were introducing legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate any attempt by the Russian government or persons in Russia to interfere with the recent US election. The commission they propose is modeled on the widely-praised 9/11 Commission."
"Two Colorado presidential electors Tuesday filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging a state law that requires them to vote for the winner of the state’s popular vote," in this case Hillary Clinton. They say they want to "vote for a third-party candidate to keep Trump from receiving 270 electoral votes," and work with other faithless electors around the country to "shift their Democratic votes to a consensus pick."