Do Senate Dems Have the Votes to Go Nuclear?

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 16: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) (C), speaks to the media while flanked by U.S. Sen. Tom Udall (D-CO) (L) and U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), after attending the weekly Senate Democratic policy luncheon at the U.S. Capitol July 16, 2013 in Washington, DC. Democrats gathered a the luncheon to discuss their agenda.
National Journal
Elahe Izad and Michael Catalini
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izad Michael Catalini
Nov. 11, 2013, 4:15 p.m.

One group fa­vor­ing abor­tion rights labeled the nuc­le­ar op­tion a “dan­ger­ous power grab.” Five oth­ers said in a state­ment that they would “op­pose any ef­fort to take away the right of any Sen­at­or to fili­buster now or in the fu­ture.”

That was in 2005. Now, with Demo­crats run­ning the Sen­ate, those groups have largely si­lenced their cri­ti­cism of the “nuc­le­ar” op­tion, which would change Sen­ate rules and make it harder to fili­buster nom­in­a­tions.

But they still fear the nuc­le­ar op­tion — and that may have hindered Demo­crats’ abil­ity to carry it out.

While Demo­crat­ic sen­at­ors are again rais­ing the specter of a rule change, it is no longer clear that they have the 51 votes they’ll need to ex­ecute such a plan, ac­cord­ing to a Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide. Sen­at­ors point to con­cerns raised by abor­tion-rights groups that worry a Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate could one day clear an­ti­abor­tion judges on a simple ma­jor­ity vote, the aide said.

In­deed, while these groups are keep­ing a lower pro­file this time around be­cause Demo­crats are in charge, the wor­ries that fueled their full-court press against the Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity in 2005 re­main.

“Our con­cerns would be that should the power struc­ture flip in the fore­see­able fu­ture, that con­ser­vat­ives would use wo­men’s re­pro­duct­ive is­sues as a ham­mer and a wedge,” said Anna Scholl, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Pro­gress VA. “That’s a very ser­i­ous con­cern.”

The cur­rent ef­fort in the Sen­ate is led by stal­wart re­formers like Sens. Jeff Merkley of Ore­gon and Tom Ud­all of New Mex­ico, but Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id and As­sist­ant Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Dick Durbin have kept a lower pro­file.

Durbin’s stock line about the nuc­le­ar op­tion is that there will be a “tip­ping point,” but he has yet to spe­cify when that would be. Re­id, nev­er shy when it comes to jab­bing Re­pub­lic­ans, has cri­ti­cized them for block­ing nom­in­a­tions but stopped short of say­ing he’s made up his mind to go nuc­le­ar.

Back in 2005, a num­ber of groups were vo­cal in ad­voc­at­ing against a rules change. Planned Par­ent­hood’s Ac­tion Net­work said at the time that it gen­er­ated al­most 115,000 calls, let­ters, and pe­ti­tion sig­na­tures against the nuc­le­ar op­tion. Civil-rights or­gan­iz­a­tions, such as the Lead­er­ship Con­fer­ence on Civil Rights, had like­wise cri­ti­cized Re­pub­lic­ans for pur­su­ing the meas­ure.

But Nan Aron, pres­id­ent of the Al­li­ance for Justice, ar­gues that this fight is dif­fer­ent than in 2005.

“We’re op­er­at­ing in a whole dif­fer­ent world now. The fili­buster was used only a hand­ful of times by Demo­crats to re­gister op­pos­i­tion to ju­di­cial nom­in­ees on mer­it. Now, ju­di­cial nom­in­ees are be­ing fili­bustered for an en­tirely dif­fer­ent reas­on, and that is solely for the pur­pose of ob­struc­tion, re­gard­less of who the nom­in­ee is,” Aron said. “This shouldn’t be ne­ces­sary at all — to call for rules re­form — but if Re­pub­lic­ans are go­ing to block votes on ju­di­cial nom­in­ees … to ob­struct, then the Demo­crats have no choice but to call for Sen­ate floor re­forms.”

Some ad­voc­ates be­lieve that Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans will likely pur­sue rules changes them­selves if they take the ma­jor­ity in the Sen­ate. In­deed, Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans say they would make such changes if Demo­crats change the rules now. Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, says his mes­sage to Demo­crats is, “Do it” — in ef­fect dar­ing them to make the rules change.

The is­sue last came to a head in Ju­ly, when 98 sen­at­ors met in the Old Sen­ate Cham­ber late in­to the night. The deal that emerged soon after that meet­ing cleared the way for a hand­ful of Pres­id­ent Obama’s nom­in­ees.

But that agree­ment pre­served Demo­crats’ abil­ity to raise the is­sue again, which is pre­cisely what’s hap­pen­ing in the Sen­ate. Re­pub­lic­ans blocked Demo­crat­ic Rep. Mel Watt of North Car­o­lina to head the Fed­er­al Hous­ing Fin­ance Agency and Pa­tri­cia Mil­lett to sit on the D.C. Cir­cuit Court of Ap­peals.

The Sen­ate re­turns after the Vet­er­ans Day hol­i­day on Tues­day. Already Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors are prom­ising to block Cor­ne­lia Pil­lard, who’s also been ap­poin­ted to serve on the D.C. Cir­cuit Court.

“The Sen­ate rules aren’t work­ing,” Scholl said. “In­stead of be­ing used to pro­tect the rights of the minor­ity, [they’re] be­ing used for petty polit­ic­al games. [But] there are cer­tainly risks in­her­ent in mov­ing for­ward with the nuc­le­ar op­tion.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login