Will Anyone Remember John Boehner?

With a little more than a year left in his term as speaker, Boehner can cater to his party or work with Democrats to pass legislation.

U.S. Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-OH, listens to questions during a Republican leadership press conference October 23, 2013 in Washington, D.C. Sixty three percent of respondents in a recent poll indicated that they believe that Boehner should be replaced as the Speaker of the House following the conclusion of the recent government funding and debt limit impasse.
National Journal
Billy House
Nov. 12, 2013, 2:24 p.m.

As John Boehner enters his fourth year as House speak­er, his own web­site bio­graphy re­flects little in the way of ma­jor le­gis­lat­ive ac­com­plish­ments while hold­ing the gavel. In­stead it men­tions that he ushered in a ban on ear­marks and a re­quire­ment for bills to be pos­ted on­line be­fore a vote.

And so, with a little more than a year left in his cur­rent term, the na­tion’s 53rd speak­er faces a choice: He can spend the next year much like the last, try­ing to re­con­cile the ram­bunc­tious tea-party wing of his con­fer­ence with more-mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans in a stand against Demo­crats in the Sen­ate and the White House. Or, he can work with House Demo­crats and a loose co­ali­tion of roughly 30 Re­pub­lic­ans who have teamed in the last year to reau­thor­ize the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act, sup­ply fund­ing for vic­tims of Hur­ricane Sandy, and end the gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“His­tory gen­er­ally looks kindly upon those in­di­vidu­als who either stood out­side the pack and dis­played foresight and cour­age, or those with a knack for com­prom­ise and get­ting the job done,” said polit­ic­al poll­ster and au­thor John Zo­gby. “It is hard to re­mem­ber much writ­ten about those who simply kept their job.”

He ad­ded: “If a por­trait in the hall and a wiki stat­ing his title are suf­fi­cient, so be it.”

Boehner’s cur­rent strategy has brought more con­flict than comity in re­cent months, but it has earned him a meas­ure of re­spect with­in his con­fer­ence — es­pe­cially among fresh­man and sopho­more con­ser­vat­ives — even as Re­pub­lic­ans have been wounded in na­tion­wide polls.

Yet there are also those who say he is squan­der­ing his lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion in the face of enorm­ous crisis, too of­ten hand­cuffed by his own party to pur­sue com­prom­ise and le­git­im­ate le­gis­lat­ive achieve­ments.

“My sense is that John Boehner’s best le­gis­lat­ive days are be­hind him,” said Sarah Bind­er, a seni­or fel­low in gov­ernance stud­ies at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion and pro­fess­or of polit­ic­al sci­ence at George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity.

But not ne­ces­sar­ily his days as speak­er. The Ohio Re­pub­lic­an is plan­ning to run again for his con­gres­sion­al seat in 2014 and his spokes­man, Mi­chael Steel, says he “has been clear, pub­licly and privately, that he in­tends to be speak­er again in the next Con­gress.

“And frankly, the idea that he might ever aban­don his mem­bers and his prin­ciples is a stu­pid lib­er­al fantasy,” Steel said.

What is clear is that Boehner is now al­most halfway through his second ses­sion as the House’s top lead­er (he’s been the top Re­pub­lic­an in the House since 2007, be­fore the GOP took over the ma­jor­ity in 2011) and it would be very dif­fi­cult to re­place him.

House rules make it very hard to de­pose the speak­er. One ham-fis­ted ef­fort by sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ives earli­er this year failed to even gen­er­ate a chal­lenger bold enough to put his or her name out pub­licly. Even if one were to emerge now, the rules hold that a speak­er must be elec­ted by a ma­jor­ity of the en­tire House. That means any such chal­lenger would re­quire the near com­plete sup­port of Boehner’s own con­fer­ence and, lack­ing that, some un­likely sup­port from Demo­crats.

Equally clear is that Boehner does have op­tions in the time be­fore he stands for a vote on his speak­er­ship again. There have been sev­er­al in­stances in re­cent months in which Boehner has en­joyed the re­li­able back­ing of a “cen­ter-left” co­ali­tion of Re­pub­lic­ans who, com­bined with large num­bers of House Demo­crats, are cap­able of passing vi­tal le­gis­la­tion.

This co­ali­tion in­cludes 30 Re­pub­lic­ans who voted to end the shut­down, to reau­thor­ize the Vi­ol­ence Against Wo­men Act, and to grant fund­ing for Sandy vic­tims. There are 44 who voted for at least two of these bills. Fully 87 Re­pub­lic­ans helped to pass last month’s le­gis­la­tion to re­start gov­ern­ment fund­ing and ex­tend the debt ceil­ing, join­ing 198 Demo­crats in ap­prov­ing it against the op­pos­i­tion of 144 Re­pub­lic­ans.

This group doesn’t re­cog­nize it­self as a single or­gan­ized caucus, and it is a mix of Old Bull mem­bers, young­er Re­pub­lic­ans, and long­time friends of Boehner. Look­ing at this, some con­gres­sion­al ex­perts sug­gest Boehner could work to uni­fy co­ali­tions of Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats to sup­port com­prom­ise solu­tions on fisc­al mat­ters, en­ti­tle­ment and tax re­form, pieces of im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and oth­er policies.

“His­tory can be kinder to a lead­er who crossed the lines than someone who al­ways stayed in between,” Zo­gby said.

But oth­ers of­fer pess­im­ism. Be­ing a uni­fi­er is “not how he got the job,” says Rice Uni­versity polit­ic­al sci­ent­ist Paul Brace.

Brace notes that Boehner was elec­ted to Con­gress in a solidly Re­pub­lic­an dis­trict by chal­len­ging a scan­dal-rid­den in­cum­bent, and that his ca­reer be­ne­fit­ted from op­por­tun­it­ies arising from tu­mult in Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship.

“He is a Cham­ber-of-Com­merce or coun­try-club Re­pub­lic­an that achieved lead­er­ship largely be­cause of di­vi­sions with­in the GOP, not be­cause he could uni­fy the party,” Brace said.

Bind­er re­called a time when Boehner had a repu­ta­tion as a le­gis­lat­ive deal-maker, cit­ing his con­tri­bu­tions to the No Child Left Be­hind law from his perch on the House Edu­ca­tion Com­mit­tee.

But she also said that “lead­ing from the speak­er­ship is hard — he can’t com­mand loy­alty from his rank and file. And giv­en the Far Right’s res­ist­ance to com­prom­ise and giv­en the speak­er’s un­will­ing­ness to gov­ern with Demo­crat­ic votes, his op­por­tun­it­ies for land­mark le­gis­lat­ive deals seem par­tic­u­larly slim.”

Wil­li­am Hoag­land, a seni­or vice pres­id­ent at the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter and former Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee staff dir­ect­or, says the ques­tion is wheth­er any­one else — such as Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor or Budget Chair­man Paul Ry­an — could do any bet­ter.

“At the end of the day, his leg­acy might simply be that he kept the House in Re­pub­lic­an con­trol,” Hoag­land said. “Or maybe not.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×