Graham Presses for Administration’s Iran Endgame

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks as Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) (L) and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) (R) listen during a news conference on Capitol Hill December 10, 2009 in Washington, DC. The legislators held a news conference to discuss climate change. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 12, 2013, 4:04 p.m.

When Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry comes to Cap­it­ol Hill on Wed­nes­day to ask law­makers to hold off on ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions against Ir­an, he is likely to face tough ques­tions about the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s en­dgame in its ne­go­ti­ations with Tehran.

Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., told re­port­ers Tues­day that there is prob­ably a split among Demo­crats about how to pro­ceed, but Re­pub­lic­ans largely fa­vor en­act­ing ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions against Ir­an.

Law­makers have been gear­ing up for an an­ti­cip­ated de­bate on Ir­an sanc­tions when the Sen­ate takes up the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act. The bill could come up later this week. Kerry is due to brief mem­bers of the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, which has jur­is­dic­tion over Ir­an sanc­tions, and mem­bers of lead­er­ship, all be­hind closed doors.

As sen­at­ors look to prep pos­sible amend­ments on Ir­an, Gra­ham de­scribed him­self as “sort of in the middle,” pre­fer­ring to see ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions with waivers move ahead in the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee rather than on the Sen­ate floor.

Gra­ham does not serve on the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, but is an in­flu­en­tial de­fense hawk in the GOP. He is ex­pec­ted to be a ma­jor play­er in the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion battle. “I un­der­stand what they are telling us about des­troy­ing a chance for a peace­ful out­come here by new sanc­tions,” he said. “But I really do be­lieve that if sanc­tions are craf­ted in the right way, where if the Ir­a­ni­ans did the things we want them to do, that would be more help­ful than harm­ful.”

Gra­ham said he ul­ti­mately ex­pects to see some tar­geted sanc­tions mov­ing ahead.

“There is a healthy skep­ti­cism in the Con­gress that this is re­peat­ing the North Korean mod­el and that the Con­gress be­lieves that more sanc­tions with waivers is prob­ably the best way to get an agree­ment we could all live with, versus back­ing off at this point,” he said.

In the mean­time, Gra­ham said that the ad­min­is­tra­tion needs to con­vince Re­pub­lic­ans that it has an achiev­able en­dgame in its ne­go­ti­ations with Tehran. “Here’s the real is­sue: How does this end?” he asked rhet­or­ic­ally.

Gra­ham said he is look­ing for four spe­cif­ic as­sur­ances from Kerry: Ir­an does not need a heavy-wa­ter re­act­or to be pro­du­cing plutoni­um for peace­ful pur­poses; all of the 20-per­cent-en­riched urani­um needs to be taken out of Ir­an; Ir­an should not con­trol the fuel cycle of any com­mer­cial re­act­or; and Ir­an should not have en­rich­ment cap­ab­il­it­ies.

“I don’t mind the Ir­a­ni­ans hav­ing a com­mer­cial nuc­le­ar pro­gram. I really don’t. I just mind them hav­ing en­rich­ment cap­ab­il­it­ies,” he said.

On a sep­ar­ate na­tion­al se­cur­ity mat­ter, Gra­ham made pos­it­ive re­marks about Jeh John­son’s pro­spects of be­ing con­firmed for Home­land Se­cur­ity sec­ret­ary. John­son test­i­fies be­fore the Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity and Gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs Com­mit­tee for his con­firm­a­tion hear­ing Wed­nes­day.

“He’s a good choice. I like Jeh,” Gra­ham said. “My prob­lems are in­ter­view­ing the five State De­part­ment wit­nesses [on Benghazi]. But Jeh John­son I think is a good choice. I worked with him when he was gen­er­al coun­sel for [the De­fense De­part­ment]. I found him very know­ledge­able — a very de­cent fel­low.”

What We're Following See More »
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Preet Bharara Learned at the Foot of Chuck Schumer
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."

Source:
DRUG OFFENDERS
Obama Commutes the Sentences of 58 Prisoners
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.

STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
×