Graham Presses for Administration’s Iran Endgame

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks as Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) (L) and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) (R) listen during a news conference on Capitol Hill December 10, 2009 in Washington, DC. The legislators held a news conference to discuss climate change. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 12, 2013, 4:04 p.m.

When Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry comes to Cap­it­ol Hill on Wed­nes­day to ask law­makers to hold off on ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions against Ir­an, he is likely to face tough ques­tions about the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s en­dgame in its ne­go­ti­ations with Tehran.

Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., told re­port­ers Tues­day that there is prob­ably a split among Demo­crats about how to pro­ceed, but Re­pub­lic­ans largely fa­vor en­act­ing ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions against Ir­an.

Law­makers have been gear­ing up for an an­ti­cip­ated de­bate on Ir­an sanc­tions when the Sen­ate takes up the Na­tion­al De­fense Au­thor­iz­a­tion Act. The bill could come up later this week. Kerry is due to brief mem­bers of the Sen­ate Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, which has jur­is­dic­tion over Ir­an sanc­tions, and mem­bers of lead­er­ship, all be­hind closed doors.

As sen­at­ors look to prep pos­sible amend­ments on Ir­an, Gra­ham de­scribed him­self as “sort of in the middle,” pre­fer­ring to see ad­di­tion­al sanc­tions with waivers move ahead in the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee rather than on the Sen­ate floor.

Gra­ham does not serve on the Bank­ing Com­mit­tee, but is an in­flu­en­tial de­fense hawk in the GOP. He is ex­pec­ted to be a ma­jor play­er in the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion battle. “I un­der­stand what they are telling us about des­troy­ing a chance for a peace­ful out­come here by new sanc­tions,” he said. “But I really do be­lieve that if sanc­tions are craf­ted in the right way, where if the Ir­a­ni­ans did the things we want them to do, that would be more help­ful than harm­ful.”

Gra­ham said he ul­ti­mately ex­pects to see some tar­geted sanc­tions mov­ing ahead.

“There is a healthy skep­ti­cism in the Con­gress that this is re­peat­ing the North Korean mod­el and that the Con­gress be­lieves that more sanc­tions with waivers is prob­ably the best way to get an agree­ment we could all live with, versus back­ing off at this point,” he said.

In the mean­time, Gra­ham said that the ad­min­is­tra­tion needs to con­vince Re­pub­lic­ans that it has an achiev­able en­dgame in its ne­go­ti­ations with Tehran. “Here’s the real is­sue: How does this end?” he asked rhet­or­ic­ally.

Gra­ham said he is look­ing for four spe­cif­ic as­sur­ances from Kerry: Ir­an does not need a heavy-wa­ter re­act­or to be pro­du­cing plutoni­um for peace­ful pur­poses; all of the 20-per­cent-en­riched urani­um needs to be taken out of Ir­an; Ir­an should not con­trol the fuel cycle of any com­mer­cial re­act­or; and Ir­an should not have en­rich­ment cap­ab­il­it­ies.

“I don’t mind the Ir­a­ni­ans hav­ing a com­mer­cial nuc­le­ar pro­gram. I really don’t. I just mind them hav­ing en­rich­ment cap­ab­il­it­ies,” he said.

On a sep­ar­ate na­tion­al se­cur­ity mat­ter, Gra­ham made pos­it­ive re­marks about Jeh John­son’s pro­spects of be­ing con­firmed for Home­land Se­cur­ity sec­ret­ary. John­son test­i­fies be­fore the Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity and Gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs Com­mit­tee for his con­firm­a­tion hear­ing Wed­nes­day.

“He’s a good choice. I like Jeh,” Gra­ham said. “My prob­lems are in­ter­view­ing the five State De­part­ment wit­nesses [on Benghazi]. But Jeh John­son I think is a good choice. I worked with him when he was gen­er­al coun­sel for [the De­fense De­part­ment]. I found him very know­ledge­able — a very de­cent fel­low.”

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
3 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
4 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

FULL CABINET IN PLACE
Acosta Confirmed As Labor Secretary
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Alexander Acosta was confirmed Thursday night as Labor secretary, officially filling out President Trump's cabinet on day 98 of his presidency. Nine Democrats joined every present Republican in voting to approve Acosta, with the final tally at 60-38. Trump's first choice for Labor secretary, Andrew Puzder, withdrew his nomination after taking criticism for hiring undocumented workers and for other matters in his personal life.

Source:
HAS WHITE HOUSE BACKING
Hurd to Make Push on Federal IT
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Rep. Will Hurd (R-TX) plans to introduce legislation today designed to help federal agencies update their aging technology—and this time, it has White House backing. Hurd worked alongside White House Office of American Innovation officials Reed Cordish and Chris Liddell in crafting and tweaking the legislation, and called their partnership an 'invaluable' part of the process."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login