WASHINGTON — In a seemingly uphill battle aimed at making budget cuts to controversial nuclear weapons programs, Representative Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) is seeking inspiration from Chicago’s most beleaguered baseball team.
“It may seem irrational to be that optimistic in Congress, but “¦ I am a Cub fan,” Quigley said during a panel discussion on Capitol Hill Wednesday. “If anybody is optimistic it is a Cub fan — anybody can have a bad century.”
Even Quigley was surprised when an attempt earlier this year to pass legislation aimed at scaling back controversial plans to modernize the B-61 nuclear bomb failed by only 22 votes. But the near-miss showed that there may be “some light at the end of the tunnel,” he said.
The lawmaker in July offered an amendment to the fiscal 2014 House energy and water appropriations bill that would have cut $23.7 million from the $551 million budget proposal for work on extending the life of the B-61. Critics say the current plan to modernize the weapon — which is stationed in U.S. allied countries in Europe — is overly ambitious and goes above and beyond simple refurbishments needed to continue its use.
The Quigley amendment, co-sponsored by Representative Jared Polis (D-Colo.), failed by a 227-196 vote. The Illinois congressman said that a provision in the amendment that would have directed the cost savings to go toward reducing the national deficit enabled him to attract some Republican votes.
However, the same provision caused some Democrats to vote against the bill, because it would have prevented the savings from being put toward other federal programs, Quigley said. He is now looking to adjust his legislative strategy to attract enough votes from both sides of the aisle.
“It’s extraordinarily tricky but I think it can be done,” Quigley said. “There’s more votes out there on the left — in fact, if I had gotten every Democratic vote, this would have passed. If I had gotten just a few more Republican votes, this would have passed.”
A possible strategy would be to craft legislation that would “make deeper cuts on [intercontinental ballistic missiles] and B-61s and use the money on a wide variety of issues,” according to Quigley.
“First of all, let the Department of Defense use the money as they see the savings on programs that actually keep us safe like counterterrorism and intelligence issues,” Quigley said. “Let’s use some of the money to reduce the debt and deficit and some of the money to deal with social programs. It may seem idealistic, but something along those lines is what’s going to get you to 218 votes.”
Quigley told reporters that he and his congressional allies are in the early stages of developing a new, “comprehensive bill.” He is looking “at the very least to educate the House as we go into the next year of appropriations” and to “address the very issues of what’s an appropriate nuclear force, what types of weapons make sense.”
After speaking at the event, the Illinois congressman told Global Security Newswire that he had not yet identified a legislative vehicle to which he could attach such provisions. However, Quigley noted his role as a member of the House Appropriations Committee, hinting that the fiscal 2015 House energy and water appropriations bill might be a likely target.
Efforts to cut funding for the B-61 program have been backed by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee. That panel earlier this year approved a bill that would provide $369 million for the B-61 program — $168 million less than the Obama administration had requested.
Feinstein on Wednesday noted that the administration has justified the B-61 program in part by saying it would enable the retirement of the significantly more powerful B-83 nuclear bomb.
“However, we have not seen an official document from the [administration’s] Nuclear Weapons Council that commits to retiring and dismantling the B-83 in an exchange for the refurbished B-61,” Feinstein said. “So I’ll believe it when I see it.”
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."