WASHINGTON — In a seemingly uphill battle aimed at making budget cuts to controversial nuclear weapons programs, Representative Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) is seeking inspiration from Chicago’s most beleaguered baseball team.
“It may seem irrational to be that optimistic in Congress, but “¦ I am a Cub fan,” Quigley said during a panel discussion on Capitol Hill Wednesday. “If anybody is optimistic it is a Cub fan — anybody can have a bad century.”
Even Quigley was surprised when an attempt earlier this year to pass legislation aimed at scaling back controversial plans to modernize the B-61 nuclear bomb failed by only 22 votes. But the near-miss showed that there may be “some light at the end of the tunnel,” he said.
The lawmaker in July offered an amendment to the fiscal 2014 House energy and water appropriations bill that would have cut $23.7 million from the $551 million budget proposal for work on extending the life of the B-61. Critics say the current plan to modernize the weapon — which is stationed in U.S. allied countries in Europe — is overly ambitious and goes above and beyond simple refurbishments needed to continue its use.
The Quigley amendment, co-sponsored by Representative Jared Polis (D-Colo.), failed by a 227-196 vote. The Illinois congressman said that a provision in the amendment that would have directed the cost savings to go toward reducing the national deficit enabled him to attract some Republican votes.
However, the same provision caused some Democrats to vote against the bill, because it would have prevented the savings from being put toward other federal programs, Quigley said. He is now looking to adjust his legislative strategy to attract enough votes from both sides of the aisle.
“It’s extraordinarily tricky but I think it can be done,” Quigley said. “There’s more votes out there on the left — in fact, if I had gotten every Democratic vote, this would have passed. If I had gotten just a few more Republican votes, this would have passed.”
A possible strategy would be to craft legislation that would “make deeper cuts on [intercontinental ballistic missiles] and B-61s and use the money on a wide variety of issues,” according to Quigley.
“First of all, let the Department of Defense use the money as they see the savings on programs that actually keep us safe like counterterrorism and intelligence issues,” Quigley said. “Let’s use some of the money to reduce the debt and deficit and some of the money to deal with social programs. It may seem idealistic, but something along those lines is what’s going to get you to 218 votes.”
Quigley told reporters that he and his congressional allies are in the early stages of developing a new, “comprehensive bill.” He is looking “at the very least to educate the House as we go into the next year of appropriations” and to “address the very issues of what’s an appropriate nuclear force, what types of weapons make sense.”
After speaking at the event, the Illinois congressman told Global Security Newswire that he had not yet identified a legislative vehicle to which he could attach such provisions. However, Quigley noted his role as a member of the House Appropriations Committee, hinting that the fiscal 2015 House energy and water appropriations bill might be a likely target.
Efforts to cut funding for the B-61 program have been backed by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Senate Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee. That panel earlier this year approved a bill that would provide $369 million for the B-61 program — $168 million less than the Obama administration had requested.
Feinstein on Wednesday noted that the administration has justified the B-61 program in part by saying it would enable the retirement of the significantly more powerful B-83 nuclear bomb.
“However, we have not seen an official document from the [administration’s] Nuclear Weapons Council that commits to retiring and dismantling the B-83 in an exchange for the refurbished B-61,” Feinstein said. “So I’ll believe it when I see it.”
What We're Following See More »
In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.
As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."
"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.
In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”
As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."