Democrats Are Starting to Freak Out About Obamacare

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers speaks at the 2013 Tribal Nations Conference held at the Department of Interior Building on November 13, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama meet with leaders of 566 Native American tribes earlier in the day at teh White House.
National Journal
Sam Baker and Elahe Izadi
Nov. 13, 2013, 5 p.m.

Con­gres­sion­al Demo­crats are quickly los­ing pa­tience with the White House as the deeply flawed Obama­care rol­lout drags on.

The broken Health­Care.gov web­site and Pres­id­ent Obama’s broken prom­ise that “if you like the plan you have, you can keep it” have sent Demo­crats search­ing for ways to dis­tance them­selves from the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Sen­ate Demo­crats are flock­ing to in­tro­duce bills they say would pre­serve Obama’s pledge, and White House of­fi­cials met with House Demo­crats on Wed­nes­day in an ef­fort to push them away from sup­port­ing a sim­il­ar Re­pub­lic­an meas­ure.

The Demo­crats’ re­sponse: If you don’t want us to vote for the GOP bill, give us something else to sup­port — be­fore Fri­day’s vote.

That’s a tall or­der for the ad­min­is­tra­tion. Obama said last week that he had dir­ec­ted his team to look for a way to ad­dress the wave of can­cel­la­tion no­tices hit­ting con­sumers in the in­di­vidu­al in­sur­ance mar­ket. But no solu­tion has been an­nounced, and policy ex­perts say there aren’t any easy op­tions.

The House bill, sponsored by En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., would al­low con­sumers to keep cer­tain health care plans longer than they can un­der the Af­ford­able Care Act.

A policy ana­lys­is from the lib­er­al Cen­ter on Budget and Policy Pri­or­it­ies said the bill would un­der­mine the health care law, not help it. But in the midst of such bad pub­li­city, that con­cern hasn’t res­on­ated with rank-and-file Demo­crats who feel boxed in by Obama.

“We wer­en’t mak­ing gran­di­ose claims. He doesn’t have to run again, I don’t know why he needs to make such gran­di­ose claims. Some of this stuff is just gra­tu­it­ous rhet­or­ic,” Rep. Jim Mor­an, D-Va., told BuzzFeed on Wed­nes­day, re­fer­ring to Obama’s prom­ises that Amer­ic­ans could keep their health plans.

In the Sen­ate, Demo­crats are rush­ing to put their stamp on the frus­tra­tion over can­celed in­sur­ance policies. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., has in­tro­duced a more ag­gress­ive ver­sion of Up­ton’s bill — hers would re­quire in­sur­ance com­pan­ies to keep of­fer­ing plans, not simply al­low them to.

She picked up sup­port from the Left when Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., agreed to co­spon­sor the bill.

Sen. Mark Ud­all, D-Colo., in­tro­duced his own “keep your health care plan” bill on Wed­nes­day — an­oth­er sign of Demo­crats’ anxi­ety.

Demo­crats’ open­ness to the Up­ton bill in the House and sim­il­ar meas­ures in the Sen­ate sug­gest they might be will­ing to help pass a bill that would sub­stant­ively delay some of Obama­care’s be­ne­fit man­dates. If they’re angry enough to ac­tu­ally push for a vote in the Sen­ate, in­sur­ance com­pan­ies and the White House would face a ser­i­ous chal­lenge try­ing to beat back changes they be­lieve would un­der­mine the com­plex sys­tems of the ACA.

Sen. Mark Be­gich, D-Alaska, who is fa­cing a tough reelec­tion fight next year, said he wasn’t sure wheth­er lead­er­ship would ac­tu­ally bring a pro­pos­al to the floor.

“I think there’s a lot of people who want to bring bills to the floor, so I’m not sure who will bring it,” he said. “But I think there’s a lot of in­terest to try to fix it.”

Demo­crats will con­tin­ue to huddle on Thursday. House Demo­crats will hold a caucus meet­ing in the af­ter­noon.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., said he will also hold a full caucus meet­ing on Thursday af­ter­noon with a num­ber of White House of­fi­cials to brief sen­at­ors on the status of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“There are many ques­tions about health care, and I un­der­stand that,” Re­id said Wed­nes­day.

Obama called Re­id late Tues­day night and had “quite a long con­ver­sa­tion,” the ma­jor­ity lead­er ad­ded. “I feel very com­fort­able after hav­ing my con­ver­sa­tion last night that it will be fixed.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×