McCaskill Makes It Personal in Battle Over Military Assaults

Senator Claire McCaskill, D-MO, speaks during a press conference announcing legislation on wartime contracting March 1, 2012 in the Senate Radio-Television Gallery of the Capitol in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 14, 2013, 6:58 p.m.

The fight over le­gis­la­tion to com­bat mil­it­ary sexu­al as­saults is get­ting more tense.

Sen. Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., the No. 4 Demo­crat on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, who has long been a lead­er on sexu­al as­sault is­sues, said she is frus­trated that re­forms she has cham­pioned have not got­ten more cred­it. And she ap­pears miffed about the at­ten­tion rival Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand, D-N.Y., is get­ting.

“I’m frus­trated that the re­forms that we have done have not got­ten the at­ten­tion they de­serve be­cause they are amaz­ing and it’s go­ing to make a huge dif­fer­ence,” Mc­Caskill said Thursday. “I’m not sure that I’ve done so well at the pub­lic re­la­tions on this; I’ll give that to her,” she said of Gil­librand.

Mc­Caskill’s com­ments came at a press con­fer­ence where she was joined by two oth­er wo­men on the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, Sens. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Deb Fisc­her, R-Neb., in cri­ti­ciz­ing the Gil­librand pro­pos­al and pro­mot­ing more mod­er­ate re­forms.

Gil­librand is pur­su­ing an amend­ment to the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill that would rad­ic­ally re­form the mil­it­ary justice sys­tem by tak­ing the de­cision of wheth­er to pro­sec­ute mil­it­ary sexu­al as­saults out of the chain of com­mand.

Gil­librand’s bill is favored by vic­tim ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tions and is adam­antly op­posed by the Pentagon and Armed Ser­vices lead­ers on both sides of the aisle.

But one of Gil­librand’s most damning op­pon­ents might be Mc­Caskill. The first fe­male sen­at­or from Mis­souri is a former courtroom pro­sec­utor who spe­cial­ized in sex crimes, helped es­tab­lish her state’s first do­mest­ic/sexu­al vi­ol­ence unit, is more seni­or on Armed Ser­vices, and is com­ing out swinging hard against a fel­low Demo­crat.

“Some­times it’s not easy to do what you think is right on the policy when the polit­ics are hard,” said Mc­Caskill, flanked by Ayotte and Fisc­her. “I’m very proud of my col­leagues to have the cour­age to stand here on policy and sub­stance as op­posed to, I think, the easi­er path of de­cid­ing this is a win­ner-and-loser ar­gu­ment, with wo­men on one side and men on the oth­er. That does this is­sue and vic­tims a great dis­ser­vice.”

For her part, Gil­librand said that she and Mc­Caskill prob­ably agree on 11 out of 12 re­forms and that she re­spects her work.

“It is not per­son­al for me,” she said. “Sen­at­or Mc­Caskill has spent months on this is­sue. She cares deeply. We just dis­agree on this one is­sue. And I’m fight­ing for it be­cause I think it will make the dif­fer­ence … in more re­port­ing, more cases go­ing to tri­al, and more con­vic­tions.”

Mc­Caskill’s press con­fer­ence came the day after Gil­librand an­nounced she is con­sid­er­ing chan­ging her bill to lim­it its pro­posed pro­sec­u­tion sys­tem to only sexu­al as­saults and rape. That would nar­row it from cov­er­ing all ma­jor crimes con­sidered a felony in the civil justice sys­tem, as it is cur­rently struc­tured.

Mc­Caskill took blatant swipes at Gil­librand’s ap­proach Thursday.

“I will say that the goal­posts keep mov­ing,” she said.

“For us it’s about the policy and it’s not as much about vote-count­ing. We are not chan­ging our pro­vi­sions to try to fig­ure out ways to get more votes. We are try­ing to stay fo­cused on what’s best for vic­tims,” she said.

Mc­Caskill ar­gued that be­cause com­mand­ers would be stripped of the de­cision to pro­sec­ute in Gil­librand’s bill, the meas­ure would fail to hold them ac­count­able.

“We just had a fun­da­ment­al policy dif­fer­ence on wheth­er or not it was go­ing to help vic­tims more to hold the com­mand­er ac­count­able or to al­low them to walk away,” she said.

Mc­Caskill’s tem­per flared hot on this is­sue in Ju­ly when Pro­tect Our De­fend­ers, a vic­tim ad­vocacy group, ran an ad in the St. Louis Post-Dis­patch, call­ing her an obstacle to re­form, which she called “un­fair.”

Greg Jac­ob, the policy dir­ect­or with the Ser­vice Wo­men’s Ac­tion Net­work, said he won­ders if that caused Mc­Caskill to feel the need to re­as­sert her­self as a lead­er on the is­sue.

“I don’t know if there have been con­ver­sa­tions go­ing on and Mc­Caskill feels she has to kind of dig her heels in and re­af­firm that she is a lead­er and ad­voc­ate on this, be­cause the re­cord clearly shows that she has been quite ef­fect­ive and very, very good…. She’s still a play­er here, so I don’t know what kind of stuff is go­ing on that would make her feel that way,” Jac­ob said.

He ad­ded that both Mc­Caskill and Gil­librand have con­sid­er­able in­flu­ence. Mc­Caskill has a his­tory work­ing on these is­sues; Gil­librand is the chair­wo­man of the Per­son­nel Sub­com­mit­tee with jur­is­dic­tion, and she has launched a massive cam­paign to talk to every sen­at­or she can to sup­port her bill.

“Wheth­er or not one has more juice than the oth­er in the com­mit­tee—that is the dy­nam­ic,” he said.

The meas­ures that Mc­Caskill wants more cred­it for in the de­fense bill had wide sup­port, in­clud­ing from Gil­librand. They would take away com­mand­ers’ abil­ity to over­turn con­vic­tions and provide a spe­cial coun­sel to provide in­de­pend­ent leg­al ad­vice to vic­tims. The amend­ment Mc­Caskill wants to add to the bill would al­low sexu­al as­sault vic­tims to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charges and would add ad­di­tion­al checks to com­mand­ers’ pro­sec­u­tion de­cisions. It is co­sponsored by Ayotte and Fisc­her and has the sup­port of Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in, D-Mich. Mc­Caskill said she ex­pects uni­form sup­port across the Sen­ate and would be “stunned” if Gil­librand did not also sup­port it.

What We're Following See More »
ORDER REMAINS BLOCKED
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Ruling Against Travel Ban
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals "has upheld the nationwide block of President Donald Trump's executive order restricting travel from several predominantly Muslim countries. ... It upholds the suspension of a revised version of the executive order that the Trump administration crafted to better hold up to legal scrutiny than an earlier version."

Source:
APPEALS COURT IN VIRGINIA
Court Upholds Block On Travel Ban
7 hours ago
BREAKING
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
8 hours ago
THE LATEST
CHINA OBJECTS
U.S. Destroyer Sails Close to Artificial Chinese Island
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A Navy destroyer sailed within 12 miles of an artificial island built by China in the South China Sea, one of several such islands at the center of territorial disputes with other nearby nations. The U.S. called it a "freedom of navigation exercise." Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Ren Guoqiang "said China had lodged stern representations to the U.S over the patrol and that such moves were not conducive to peace and stability in the South China Sea."

Source:
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
10 hours ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login