Russia on Thursday sent the United States the final shipment of atomic-energy material produced from downblended warhead-grade uranium, signaling the end of a 20-year bilateral nonproliferation program, the New York Times reported.
Under the Megatons to Megawatts program, Russia converted fissile material from approximately 20,000 Soviet-era warheads into civilian-grade uranium that was then used to fuel U.S. atomic power plants, generating roughly 10 percent of all of the electricity produced in the United States.
Senior Russian and U.S. officials gathered in St. Petersburg on Thursday to see off the final shipment, which contained enough uranium to fuel approximately 80 nuclear weapons.
“Congratulations on the last shipment! Stay safe!,” wrote acting U.S. Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Rose Gottemoeller on one of the cylinders filled with low-enriched uranium.
“Our focus globally is to minimize high-enriched uranium wherever it is found,” Gottemoeller told the Times.
Russia and the United States continue to hold vast amounts of warhead-grade uranium, which has an enrichment level of around 90 percent, which is leftover from the Cold War. The onetime antagonists collectively are estimated to possess in excess of 700 tons of highly enriched uranium, according to the International Panel on Fissile Materials. Washington has downblended 143 tons of former HEU material and is committed to converting an additional 43 tons. Though Moscow has blended down more material than Washington, it is believed to still possess a much greater quantity of surplus bomb-ready uranium.
“For two decades, one in 10 light bulbs in America has been powered by nuclear material from Russian nuclear warheads,” U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said of the Megatons to Megawatts initiative, according to a Reuters report.
Russia earned roughly $17 billion over the two-decade run of the program, according to Moniz.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"