Most Vulnerable House Democrats Side With GOP on ‘Obamacare’ Vote

Eight of the nine Dems who represent districts Obama lost in 2012 voted for the GOP bill.

National Journal
Nov. 15, 2013, 10:19 a.m.

Thirty-nine House Demo­crats, many from battle­ground ter­rit­ory, broke from their party Fri­day to sup­port Re­pub­lic­ans’ “Keep Your Health Care Plan” Obama­care fix — which the White House and many Demo­crats have said would “gut” the law.

The vote fol­lowed some fa­mil­i­ar pat­terns. Eight of the nine Demo­crats rep­res­ent­ing ter­rit­ory Mitt Rom­ney car­ried in the 2012 pres­id­en­tial race sup­por­ted the bill; Rep. Ann Kirk­patrick, D-Ar­iz., a fierce sup­port­er of the law, was the only out­lier there. In fact, Kirk­patrick was one of only two Demo­crats, along with Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Is­rael of New York, who voted no on the bill and rep­res­ent a dis­trict where Pres­id­ent Obama got less than 53 per­cent of the vote in 2012. Over­all, 28 of the 36 vot­ing Demo­crats from dis­tricts where Obama won less than 55 per­cent voted for the bill, and only 11 of 156 vot­ing Demo­crats from dis­tricts where Obama topped 55 per­cent fol­lowed suit.

Kirk­patrick was also one of just three “Front­line” Demo­crats, mem­bers of the DCCC pro­gram for elect­or­ally vul­ner­able in­cum­bents, who didn’t join Re­pub­lic­ans on the vote. Reps. Lois Capps of Cali­for­nia and John Tier­ney of Mas­sachu­setts were the oth­er two. (DCCC Front­line chair­man Tim Walz joined most of the mem­bers in his pro­gram in vot­ing for the meas­ure.)

Demo­crats’ Up­ton Votes by Obama’s 2012 Per­form­ance
Roll over a circle for more in­form­a­tion or click and drag on the chart to zoom in­to a spe­cif­ic area. Blue in­dic­ates a yes vote; gray in­dic­ates a no vote.

The Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee slammed both groups of Demo­crats alike in state­ments. The com­mit­tee called Kirk­patrick a “co-con­spir­at­or in Pres­id­ent Obama’s claim that if you like your health care plan you can keep it” and had broken a prom­ise in today’s vote. The com­mit­tee was no more kind to the oth­ers. “No mat­ter what this Wash­ing­ton politi­cian says, Nick Ra­hall voted to give us Obama­Care and keep Obama­Care on the books,” NR­CC spokes­wo­man An­drea Bozek said in a state­ment after Ra­hall joined the GOP on this vote.

“Today, I voted against H.R. 3350, the Up­ton bill, be­cause it would neither fix nor im­prove the ACA,” Kirk­patrick said in a state­ment that also called the re­cent Obama­care rol­lout a “dis­aster.”

Be­low is the full list of 39 Demo­crats who voted for the bill:

Rep. Ron Barber of Ari­zona
Rep. John Bar­row of Geor­gia
Rep. Ami Be­ra of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Tim Bish­op of New York
Rep. Bruce Bra­ley of Iowa
Rep. Ju­lia Brown­ley of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Cheri Bus­tos of Illinois
Rep. Jim Costa of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Peter De­Fazio of Ore­gon
Rep. Su­z­an Del­Bene of Wash­ing­ton
Rep. Tammy Duck­worth of Illinois
Rep. Bill En­yart of Illinois
Rep. Eliza­beth Esty of Con­necti­c­ut
Rep. Bill Foster of Illinois
Rep. Pete Gal­lego of Texas
Rep. John Gara­mendi of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Joe Gar­cia of Flor­ida
Rep. Ron Kind of Wis­con­sin
Rep. Ann McLane Kuster of New Hamp­shire
Rep. Dave Loeb­sack of Iowa
Rep. Dan Maf­fei of New York
Rep. Sean Malo­ney of New York
Rep. Jim Math­eson of Utah
Rep. Mike McIntyre of North Car­o­lina
Rep. Jerry McNer­ney of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Patrick Murphy of Flor­ida
Rep. Rick No­lan of Min­nesota
Rep. Bill Owens of New York
Rep. Scott Peters of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Gary Peters of Michigan
Rep. Col­lin Peterson of Min­nesota
Rep. Nick Ra­hall of West Vir­gin­ia
Rep. Raul Ruiz of Cali­for­nia
Rep. Brad Schneider of Illinois
Rep. Kurt Schrader of Ore­gon
Rep. Car­ol Shea-Port­er of New Hamp­shire
Rep. Kyrsten Sinema of Ari­zona
Rep. Filem­on Vela of Texas
Rep. Tim Walz of Min­nesota

Graph­ic by Bri­an Mc­Gill

What We're Following See More »
OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATIONS
House Ethics Committee Sanctions Meadows, Kihuen
12 minutes ago
THE LATEST

The House Ethics Committee has formally sanctioned Reps. Mark Meadows and Ruben Kihuen over sexual harassment-related allegations. "Meadows was found to have violated House rules 'by failing to take appropriate steps to ensure that his House office was free from discrimination and any perception of discrimination.'" Meadows will have to pay over $40,000 to cover the cost of former chief of staff Kenny West's salary, who remained on his payroll even after Meadows' learned "of credible harassment allegations against the former aide. ... Kihuen, who announced his retirement as the #MeToo movement swept Capitol Hill last year, was found to have 'made persistent and unwanted advances towards women who were required to interact with him as part of their professional responsibilities.'"

Source:
EX-COAL LOBBYIST, FORMER #2
Trump To Nominate Andrew Wheeler To Lead EPA
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"President Trump said he plans to nominate Andrew Wheeler, acting head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to be the EPA's Senate-confirmed administrator." Wheeler took over as acting administrator in July, "when then-EPA chief Scott Pruitt resigned amid numerous spending and ethics scandals. ... Before working for the government, Wheeler was a lobbyist and lawyer for energy companies such as coal mining giant Murray Energy Corp."

Source:
BUT NOT SUBMITTED THEM
Trump Says He's Completed Answers to Mueller's Questions
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
CORNYN, GRAHAM NEXT IN LINE
Grassley Will Chair Judiciary Committee, Leave Finance
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
RULES NOW ENTER PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
DeVos Overhauls Guidance to Colleges on Sex Misconduct Cases
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has updated the Obama administration's controversial rules on how colleges handle claims of sexual misconduct by students under Title IX. "The proposed new rules aim to significantly enhance legal protections for the accused, and reflect a sentiment expressed personally by President Trump that men are being unfairly presumed guilty." The rules, which must undergo a public comment period, would allow schools to elevate the burden of proof in sex cases to "clear and convincing evidence." They would also permit cross-examination, and lift time limits on investigations.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login