Congress Expands Entitlements for Chimpanzees

“It’s a great day for federally owned chimpanzees.”

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Nov. 15, 2013, 10:49 a.m.

This week, in a mo­ment of sober bi­par­tis­an agree­ment, the House and Sen­ate voted to ex­tend re­tire­ment be­ne­fits for the na­tion’s re­search chim­pan­zees.  

As Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Elahe Iz­adi re­por­ted a few weeks ago, the Na­tion­al In­sti­tutes of Health was quickly ap­proach­ing a $30 mil­lion ceil­ing for the amount it could spend on re­search-chimp re­tire­ments.

This left the agency in a bind, as the NIH is phas­ing out many of the ex­per­i­ments it con­ducts with chimps. A 2011 re­port found that most re­search con­duc­ted on them is un­ne­ces­sary, and in the com­ing months 310 an­im­als (out of 360) will be re­tired. Though it prob­ably wouldn’t have come to it, eu­thanas­ia could have been used if it was deemed to be in the best in­terest of the an­im­als.

With the new bill, fund­ing is se­cured through 2023. Over the next four years, the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice says, it will cost $55 mil­lion.

Chimp ad­voc­ates were ec­stat­ic at the news.

“It’s a great day for fed­er­ally owned chim­pan­zees,” Cathy Wil­lis Spraetz, pres­id­ent and CEO of Chimp Haven in Keithville, La. (the na­tion­al chimp re­tire­ment com­munity sanc­tu­ary), told The Wash­ing­ton Post. “I am break­ing out the cham­pagne as we speak.”

And it is ex­cit­ing. Who wouldn’t want to re­tire to a fa­cil­ity with ample “climb­ing, swinging, and rest­ing op­tions as well as views of the sur­round­ing areas,” along with 200 acres of forest and ac­com­mod­a­tions for “large so­cial groups.”

As ad­vert­ised on the Chimp Haven web­site: “How the chim­pan­zees choose to spend their day is up to them.”

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
13 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×