Inside the Fracking War

In cities and towns across Colorado, “fractivists” concerned about air and water are taking on the booming oil and gas industry.

Greeley residents Bob Winkler and Sara Barwinski stand before oil and natural-gas wells near a high school in this Northern Colorado town.
National Journal
Amy Harder
Nov. 17, 2013, 7 a.m.

GREE­LEY, Colo. — I was sit­ting around a din­ing-room table with a dozen oth­er people, in a non­des­cript home in this city that has about 95,000 people and al­most 500 oil and nat­ur­al-gas wells. They were plot­ting a strategy that sim­ul­tan­eously en­gages with, and works against, en­ergy com­pan­ies.

“I just think it’s bet­ter if we play our cards a little closer to our chest,” said Ther­ese Gil­bert, a middle-school teach­er and a steer­ing com­mit­tee mem­ber of Weld Air and Wa­ter, a small (just 100 mem­bers) cit­izens’ group con­cerned about grow­ing en­ergy de­vel­op­ment in Weld County, one of the most drilled counties in the United States, with more than 15,000 wells.

“We have to re­tain our power,” Gil­bert said with a fever pitch in her voice more ap­pro­pri­ate for a battle than a meet­ing.

I didn’t real­ize then, but I took my first step in­to the trenches of the state’s war over frack­ing that early-Novem­ber even­ing. Col­or­ado, which has doubled its oil pro­duc­tion and in­creased by 30 per­cent its nat­ur­al-gas pro­duc­tion since 2005, is a mi­cro­cosm of the na­tion’s en­ergy boom and the be­ne­fits and risks that come with it.

The mo­tion on the pro­ver­bi­al table, next to the chili and beer on the ac­tu­al table, was this: Should Weld Air and Wa­ter ask Syn­ergy, a Col­or­ado-based oil and gas com­pany, to send a joint in­vit­a­tion to Demo­crat­ic Gov. John Hick­en­loop­er to come to Gree­ley and see firsthand its oil and gas op­er­a­tions?

“Out in Pennsylvania, they’re work­ing with the in­dustry,” said Bob Wink­ler, a re­tired Gree­ley res­id­ent. “I don’t know. Trust but — what was that Re­agan said? Veri­fy.”

The mem­bers of Weld Air and Wa­ter are fun­da­ment­ally against drilling close to homes, schools, and play­grounds. Oil and nat­ur­al-gas com­pan­ies, buoyed by re­li­ably high oil prices and dec­ades-old prop­erty laws that al­low them to drill next door to these areas, are ramp­ing up pro­duc­tion throughout Col­or­ado’s sub­urb­an Front Range and try­ing — so far with lim­ited suc­cess — to con­vince com­munit­ies that they will drill safely.

Frack­ing, an ex­trac­tion tech­no­logy that res­id­ents and some ex­perts worry could con­tam­in­ate drink­ing-wa­ter sup­plies, has come to en­com­pass the en­tire de­bate of Amer­ica’s boom in oil and gas pro­duc­tion.

“There is no one more than me who hates where they put it,” said Sara Bar­w­in­ski, whose house is with­in 700 feet of a cur­rent Syn­ergy op­er­a­tion of six wells that the com­pany says it will at least double and at most triple in well num­bers early next year.

She re­coun­ted the con­struct­ive con­ver­sa­tions she’s had with Syn­ergy and how it has gran­ted al­most all of her re­quests re­gard­ing this pro­ject, in­clud­ing us­ing new air-mon­it­or­ing tech­no­logy. “Of course you do state-of-the-art tech­no­logy,” Bar­w­in­ski said. “But that doesn’t make it right. It doesn’t make it good. It makes a bad situ­ation less bad.”

A little while later, when the chili was gone and leftover Hal­loween candy had taken its place, an­oth­er mo­tion was open: ask­ing the Gree­ley City Coun­cil, a pro-drilling crowd, to place a morator­i­um on new drilling pro­jects with­in city lim­its un­til tough­er reg­u­la­tions were in place. If the coun­cil doesn’t grant such a re­quest (which is likely), Weld Air and Wa­ter would try to put a frack­ing morator­i­um on next year’s bal­lot sim­il­ar to the ini­ti­at­ives that would face voters in Gree­ley’s four neigh­bor­ing cit­ies the day after this meet­ing.

“The prob­lem with us go­ing to the bal­lot is the oil and gas in­dustry has put $300,000 in­to the bal­lot ini­ti­at­ive in Fort Collins. They’ve got maybe two wells,” said Matt Sura, an en­vir­on­ment­al law­yer who rep­res­ents the group for free. “We’re talk­ing 200 wells that would be po­ten­tially af­fected. More than 1,000 wells they’re go­ing to squeeze in­to the city of Gree­ley. Any one of those wells cost $5 mil­lion to drill.”

Sura paused, and for once no one said any­thing dur­ing a meet­ing that stretched more than two hours. “How much do you think they might try to spend to de­feat us? Take a guess,” Sura coaxed his col­leagues. “It’s got to be over a mil­lion.”

Step­ping out­side of the con­fines of that house in Gree­ley where com­prom­ise was a re­luct­ant real­ity, I entered the frack­ing bat­tle­fields, where com­prom­ise and some­times even real­ity were in short sup­ply.

“There is go­ing to be a groundswell of op­pos­i­tion that the in­dustry and the coun­try have nev­er seen be­fore,” said Shane Dav­is, a self-de­scribed “fract­iv­ist” whose full-time job is to mo­bil­ize people against frack­ing and fossil fuels more gen­er­ally. “This is just the be­gin­ning,” said Dav­is, who gets part of his paycheck from the out­door com­pany Pa­tago­nia, which act­ively op­poses frack­ing. He’s also the re­gion­al dir­ect­or for cam­paigns around anti-frack­ing films Gasland and Gasland 2, which have gal­van­ized grass­roots ef­forts and en­raged the en­ergy in­dustry over what even in­de­pend­ent ex­perts say are du­bi­ous claims made by the pro­du­cer, Josh Fox, in the films.

As he was driv­ing his gas­ol­ine-powered Volvo, I asked him why he doesn’t drive an elec­tric car if he dis­likes the oil in­dustry so much. “In fact, I had one. It broke down,” Dav­is told me. “But, back to the point, the oil and gas in­dustry has a mono­poly.”

It was Elec­tion Day and Dav­is was fit­ting our two-hour “tour de frack” in between ap­pear­ances in the four Col­or­ado cit­ies that were vot­ing on anti-frack­ing meas­ures that day: Fort Collins, Boulder, La­fay­ette, and Broom­field. By 9 p.m., the res­ults were clear if not yet fi­nal: The first three anti-frack­ing meas­ures won rather eas­ily, and the meas­ure in the more purple-lean­ing Broom­field nar­rowly failed, only to have it over­turned a week later in a re­count. An­oth­er re­count is now re­quired.

“The Front Range res­ist­ance that we’ve built is go­ing to chime across the United States,” Dav­is said in the af­ter­noon be­fore the res­ults were in. “We already have Texas call­ing us ask­ing for help. Cali­for­nia is ask­ing us for ad­vice. And we take ad­vice from New York and Pennsylvania. We share in­form­a­tion all over the place.”

Dav­is and oth­er act­iv­ists in Col­or­ado were coy about their plans postelec­tion, which may in­clude a push for a statewide frack­ing ban. But one thing is clear: They’ll keep fight­ing frack­ing, and the in­dustry will re­spond, much more than it already has.

I then moved from one side of the war to the oth­er. The day after the elec­tion, the Col­or­ado Oil and Gas As­so­ci­ation held its an­nu­al meet­ing where CEO Tisha Con­oly Schuller gave a warn­ing to the hun­dreds of as­sembled oil and gas ex­ec­ut­ives about the out­comes of the anti-frack­ing meas­ures.

“If this does not put fear in­to your hearts, it should. It really should,” Schuller said. She called on the ex­ec­ut­ives to en­gage on a grass­roots level that can com­pete with the fract­iv­ists, a com­mon term in Col­or­ado that I had nev­er heard be­fore ar­riv­ing here.

“What we learned from our en­gage­ment is that every single heart and mind is won on the ground with hu­man-to-hu­man con­tact,” Schuller said. Later that day, in an in­ter­view in her 10th floor of­fice in down­town Den­ver, Schuller was can­did that the in­dustry will, of course, spend more money to fight fract­iv­ists.

“This is just round one of a long en­gage­ment,” she said. “Yes, we’re go­ing to con­tin­ue to in­vest in loc­al com­munity ini­ti­at­ives about edu­cat­ing neigh­bors.”

I real­ized then that the con­ver­sa­tion in­side the Gree­ley home just two days earli­er was a rare ex­ample of po­ten­tial com­prom­ise and co­oper­a­tion in a dis­pute that of­ten has op­pon­ents shout­ing over each oth­er.

“What’s so fas­cin­at­ing to me is the two sides al­most nev­er talk to each oth­er,” Hick­en­loop­er, the state’s gov­ernor, said in a phone in­ter­view the week after the elec­tion.

Re­fer­ring to a town-hall meet­ing he held in Gree­ley a month ago, Hick­en­loop­er said he’s go­ing to do ex­actly what Weld Air and Wa­ter was con­sid­er­ing do­ing.

“What we’re go­ing to try to do in the next round is to reach out to more en­vir­on­ment­al groups and the oil and gas in­dustry and try to have both sides in the same room and let each side hear each oth­er out,” Hick­en­loop­er said.

He wants to end his state’s frack­ing war with dip­lomacy. It’s a hope­ful goal, but it re­mains to be seen wheth­er the two sides can drop the heated rhet­or­ic and take up a peace­ful dia­logue.

What We're Following See More »
11 HOUSE MEMBERS NOW BEHIND HIM
Two Committee Chairs Endorse Trump
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Two powerful House members—Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Veterans Affairs Committee Chair Jeff Miller (R-FL)—are throwing their support behind Donald Trump.

Source:
BUT WOULD HE THROW THE CHAIR?
Bobby Knight: Trump Would Drop the Bomb Just Like Truman
14 hours ago
THE LATEST
LAST PLACE
Trump Still Struggling for Endorsements
17 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
MORE INDEPENDENTS, FEWER SUPERDELEGATES
Sanders Could Force Changes to Nominating Process
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

There are not "ongoing, direct conversations between" the Bernie Sanders camp and the Hillary Clinton camp regarding "the platform or rules changes," but Sanders "is already making his opening arguments" about those issues on the stump. Sanders is putting "complaints about closed primaries" atop his stump speeches lately, and figures to start a "conversation about the role of superdelegates in the nominating process." He said, “Our goal, whether we win or we do not win, is to transform the Democratic Party."

Source:
‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH’
Boehner Says He Wouldn’t Vote for Cruz
21 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Well, this is unsubtle. Former Speaker John Boehner called Ted Cruz "lucifer in the flesh," adding that he "never worked with a more miserable son of a bitch in my life." Boehner has endorsed John Kasich, but he said he'd vote for Donald Trump over Cruz. He also praised Bernie Sanders, calling him the most honest politician in the race, and predicted that Joe Biden may yet have a role to play in the Democratic contest, especially if Hillary Clinton runs into legal trouble over her emails.

Source:
×