Poll: Obama Down but Congress Is Down Further

A man walks near the U.S. Capitol building before sunrise, on October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ronald Brownstein
Nov. 18, 2013, 8:28 a.m.

The bot­tom has fallen out for every­one in the na­tion’s polit­ic­al lead­er­ship.

That’s the mes­sage from the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll, which shows that after a gov­ern­ment shut­down, near-de­fault on the fed­er­al debt, the calam­it­ous de­but of Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care plan, and con­tin­ued slug­gish­ness in the eco­nomy, Amer­ic­ans aren’t feel­ing much hol­i­day cheer about the coun­try’s dir­ec­tion or any­one set­ting it.

Just 38 per­cent of those polled said they ap­proved of Obama’s job per­form­ance, with 55 per­cent dis­ap­prov­ing. That’s the low­est ap­prov­al, and highest dis­ap­prov­al, the Heart­land Mon­it­or poll has re­cor­ded for Obama in the 19 times it has meas­ured his stand­ing since April 2009. The latest num­bers con­tin­ue a slide for Obama that had taken his ap­prov­al rat­ing from 54 per­cent im­me­di­ately after his reelec­tion last Novem­ber to 40 per­cent in Septem­ber.

Amer­ic­ans are even more du­bi­ous about Con­gress. Just 9 per­cent of those polled (down from 21 per­cent last Novem­ber) ap­proved of its per­form­ance. Fully 84 per­cent dis­ap­proved. Al­most nine-in-10 of those who dis­ap­proved of Obama’s per­form­ance also gave Con­gress a thumbs-down; 56 per­cent of those who dis­ap­proved of Con­gress also flunked Obama.

For good meas­ure, just 23 per­cent of those polled said Amer­ica is mov­ing in the right dir­ec­tion; 65 per­cent said it’s on the wrong track. After the 2012 elec­tion, those num­bers stood at 41 per­cent right track and 51 per­cent wrong track.

Oth­er meas­ures con­tin­ued to pro­duce con­sist­ently grim ver­dicts. Just 23 per­cent said Obama’s agenda would in­crease op­por­tun­ity for people like them to get ahead, while 47 per­cent said it would di­min­ish their op­por­tun­it­ies; 25 per­cent said it would have no im­pact. That was es­sen­tially un­changed since Septem­ber, but a sig­ni­fic­ant de­cline since fall 2012, when two sur­veys found adults split about evenly on wheth­er Obama’s plans would im­prove or di­min­ish their chances.

Like­wise, just 34 per­cent of those polled said Obama’s eco­nom­ic policies had helped “to avoid an even worse eco­nom­ic crisis, and are fuel­ing eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery”; a 52 per­cent ma­jor­ity said in­stead he had “run up a re­cord fed­er­al de­fi­cit while fail­ing to sig­ni­fic­antly im­prove the eco­nomy.” That con­tin­ues a de­cline over the past year and rep­res­ents the smal­lest share ex­press­ing a pos­it­ive view about Obama’s eco­nom­ic im­pact since the Heart­land Mon­it­or began ask­ing this ques­tion (and a sim­il­arly worded pre­de­cessor) in 2009.

This poll sur­veyed 1,000 adults by land­line and cell phones from Nov. 2-6. The sur­vey, su­per­vised by Ed Re­illy, Brent McGoldrick, Jeremy Ruch, and Jocelyn Land­au of FTI Con­sult­ing’s Stra­tegic Com­mu­nic­a­tions prac­tice, has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points.

Still, in a clear-cut forest, Obama is man­aging to stand slightly taller on one key meas­ure. Asked whom they trust to de­vel­op solu­tions to the coun­try’s eco­nom­ic chal­lenges, those polled pre­ferred Obama over con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans by 36 per­cent to 33 per­cent. That’s a smal­ler ad­vant­age than the pres­id­ent has en­joyed in most of the past two years, though com­par­able to his stand­ing through 2011.

Not that Amer­ic­ans see any­one of­fer­ing many an­swers for the eco­nomy. Just 11 per­cent said they con­sider the eco­nomy in ex­cel­lent or good shape, while a re­sound­ing 88 per­cent de­scribe it as only fair or poor. The of­fi­cial score­keep­ers may have de­clared the re­ces­sion over in 2009, but 53 per­cent said they be­lieve the eco­nomy is still in re­ces­sion; only 41 per­cent be­lieve it has lif­ted. Just 29 per­cent said they ex­pect the eco­nomy to im­prove over the next year (while 30 per­cent ex­pect to re­main the same and 36 per­cent ex­pect it to de­teri­or­ate). That’s much glum­mer than even last June, when 37 per­cent ex­pec­ted im­prove­ment and 26 per­cent were bra­cing for de­cline. (Im­me­di­ately after the elec­tion, 44 per­cent ex­pec­ted im­prove­ment.)

Amer­ic­ans are slightly more op­tim­ist­ic about their per­son­al fin­an­cial situ­ation, but hardly eu­phor­ic. Just 44 per­cent de­scribed their fin­ances as ex­cel­lent or good, while 56 per­cent said they were only fair or poor. Those num­bers have re­mained re­mark­ably stable since the Heart­land Mon­it­or first asked the ques­tion in April 2009. Look­ing for­ward, about two-fifths ex­pect their situ­ation to im­prove over the next year; that’s down slightly from last sum­mer.

Obama’s tumble re­flects a de­cline both among groups skep­tic­al and tra­di­tion­ally sup­port­ive of him. Among two groups that have con­sist­ently res­isted him, Obama set a new low in ap­prov­al among whites without col­lege de­grees (23 per­cent), while ty­ing his nadir among col­lege-edu­cated white men (32 per­cent). But the poll also shows him at­tract­ing his low­est ap­prov­al rat­ing ever among non­whites (only 59 per­cent) and ty­ing (at 40 per­cent) his weak­est per­form­ance with col­lege-edu­cated white wo­men, the por­tion of the white elect­or­ate his­tor­ic­ally most open to him. Obama also hit an all-time low among in­de­pend­ents (at 29 per­cent).

Whites say Obama’s agenda will de­crease, rather than in­crease, their op­por­tun­it­ies by a thump­ing 56 per­cent to 15 per­cent, and they prefer con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans over him for solv­ing the coun­try’s eco­nom­ic prob­lems by a 12-point mar­gin. Minor­it­ies are still roughly twice as likely to say his agenda will in­crease rather than di­min­ish their op­por­tun­it­ies, and they prefer him over the GOP for solv­ing the na­tion’s eco­nom­ic chal­lenges by al­most 4-to-1.

There’s little op­tim­ism in any corner that the two sides will solve a key fisc­al chal­lenge loom­ing on the ho­ri­zon. Just one-fourth of those polled said they are con­fid­ent Obama and Con­gress will reach a de­fi­cit agree­ment and avoid an­oth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down next year. Al­most three-fourths say they don’t have much con­fid­ence Wash­ing­ton can reach a deal. With in­siders in both parties gen­er­ally dis­count­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of an­oth­er shut­down, that sug­gests Wash­ing­ton, if noth­ing else, has suc­ceeded in lower­ing the pub­lic’s ex­pect­a­tions to a point where it might fi­nally sur­pass them.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
1 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
3 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
5 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
7 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
7 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.