Poll: Obama Down but Congress Is Down Further

A man walks near the U.S. Capitol building before sunrise, on October 17, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Ronald Brownstein
Add to Briefcase
Ronald Brownstein
Nov. 18, 2013, 8:28 a.m.

The bot­tom has fallen out for every­one in the na­tion’s polit­ic­al lead­er­ship.

That’s the mes­sage from the latest All­state/Na­tion­al Journ­al Heart­land Mon­it­or Poll, which shows that after a gov­ern­ment shut­down, near-de­fault on the fed­er­al debt, the calam­it­ous de­but of Pres­id­ent Obama’s health care plan, and con­tin­ued slug­gish­ness in the eco­nomy, Amer­ic­ans aren’t feel­ing much hol­i­day cheer about the coun­try’s dir­ec­tion or any­one set­ting it.

Just 38 per­cent of those polled said they ap­proved of Obama’s job per­form­ance, with 55 per­cent dis­ap­prov­ing. That’s the low­est ap­prov­al, and highest dis­ap­prov­al, the Heart­land Mon­it­or poll has re­cor­ded for Obama in the 19 times it has meas­ured his stand­ing since April 2009. The latest num­bers con­tin­ue a slide for Obama that had taken his ap­prov­al rat­ing from 54 per­cent im­me­di­ately after his reelec­tion last Novem­ber to 40 per­cent in Septem­ber.

Amer­ic­ans are even more du­bi­ous about Con­gress. Just 9 per­cent of those polled (down from 21 per­cent last Novem­ber) ap­proved of its per­form­ance. Fully 84 per­cent dis­ap­proved. Al­most nine-in-10 of those who dis­ap­proved of Obama’s per­form­ance also gave Con­gress a thumbs-down; 56 per­cent of those who dis­ap­proved of Con­gress also flunked Obama.

For good meas­ure, just 23 per­cent of those polled said Amer­ica is mov­ing in the right dir­ec­tion; 65 per­cent said it’s on the wrong track. After the 2012 elec­tion, those num­bers stood at 41 per­cent right track and 51 per­cent wrong track.

Oth­er meas­ures con­tin­ued to pro­duce con­sist­ently grim ver­dicts. Just 23 per­cent said Obama’s agenda would in­crease op­por­tun­ity for people like them to get ahead, while 47 per­cent said it would di­min­ish their op­por­tun­it­ies; 25 per­cent said it would have no im­pact. That was es­sen­tially un­changed since Septem­ber, but a sig­ni­fic­ant de­cline since fall 2012, when two sur­veys found adults split about evenly on wheth­er Obama’s plans would im­prove or di­min­ish their chances.

Like­wise, just 34 per­cent of those polled said Obama’s eco­nom­ic policies had helped “to avoid an even worse eco­nom­ic crisis, and are fuel­ing eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery”; a 52 per­cent ma­jor­ity said in­stead he had “run up a re­cord fed­er­al de­fi­cit while fail­ing to sig­ni­fic­antly im­prove the eco­nomy.” That con­tin­ues a de­cline over the past year and rep­res­ents the smal­lest share ex­press­ing a pos­it­ive view about Obama’s eco­nom­ic im­pact since the Heart­land Mon­it­or began ask­ing this ques­tion (and a sim­il­arly worded pre­de­cessor) in 2009.

This poll sur­veyed 1,000 adults by land­line and cell phones from Nov. 2-6. The sur­vey, su­per­vised by Ed Re­illy, Brent McGoldrick, Jeremy Ruch, and Jocelyn Land­au of FTI Con­sult­ing’s Stra­tegic Com­mu­nic­a­tions prac­tice, has a mar­gin of er­ror of plus or minus 3.1 per­cent­age points.

Still, in a clear-cut forest, Obama is man­aging to stand slightly taller on one key meas­ure. Asked whom they trust to de­vel­op solu­tions to the coun­try’s eco­nom­ic chal­lenges, those polled pre­ferred Obama over con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans by 36 per­cent to 33 per­cent. That’s a smal­ler ad­vant­age than the pres­id­ent has en­joyed in most of the past two years, though com­par­able to his stand­ing through 2011.

Not that Amer­ic­ans see any­one of­fer­ing many an­swers for the eco­nomy. Just 11 per­cent said they con­sider the eco­nomy in ex­cel­lent or good shape, while a re­sound­ing 88 per­cent de­scribe it as only fair or poor. The of­fi­cial score­keep­ers may have de­clared the re­ces­sion over in 2009, but 53 per­cent said they be­lieve the eco­nomy is still in re­ces­sion; only 41 per­cent be­lieve it has lif­ted. Just 29 per­cent said they ex­pect the eco­nomy to im­prove over the next year (while 30 per­cent ex­pect to re­main the same and 36 per­cent ex­pect it to de­teri­or­ate). That’s much glum­mer than even last June, when 37 per­cent ex­pec­ted im­prove­ment and 26 per­cent were bra­cing for de­cline. (Im­me­di­ately after the elec­tion, 44 per­cent ex­pec­ted im­prove­ment.)

Amer­ic­ans are slightly more op­tim­ist­ic about their per­son­al fin­an­cial situ­ation, but hardly eu­phor­ic. Just 44 per­cent de­scribed their fin­ances as ex­cel­lent or good, while 56 per­cent said they were only fair or poor. Those num­bers have re­mained re­mark­ably stable since the Heart­land Mon­it­or first asked the ques­tion in April 2009. Look­ing for­ward, about two-fifths ex­pect their situ­ation to im­prove over the next year; that’s down slightly from last sum­mer.

Obama’s tumble re­flects a de­cline both among groups skep­tic­al and tra­di­tion­ally sup­port­ive of him. Among two groups that have con­sist­ently res­isted him, Obama set a new low in ap­prov­al among whites without col­lege de­grees (23 per­cent), while ty­ing his nadir among col­lege-edu­cated white men (32 per­cent). But the poll also shows him at­tract­ing his low­est ap­prov­al rat­ing ever among non­whites (only 59 per­cent) and ty­ing (at 40 per­cent) his weak­est per­form­ance with col­lege-edu­cated white wo­men, the por­tion of the white elect­or­ate his­tor­ic­ally most open to him. Obama also hit an all-time low among in­de­pend­ents (at 29 per­cent).

Whites say Obama’s agenda will de­crease, rather than in­crease, their op­por­tun­it­ies by a thump­ing 56 per­cent to 15 per­cent, and they prefer con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans over him for solv­ing the coun­try’s eco­nom­ic prob­lems by a 12-point mar­gin. Minor­it­ies are still roughly twice as likely to say his agenda will in­crease rather than di­min­ish their op­por­tun­it­ies, and they prefer him over the GOP for solv­ing the na­tion’s eco­nom­ic chal­lenges by al­most 4-to-1.

There’s little op­tim­ism in any corner that the two sides will solve a key fisc­al chal­lenge loom­ing on the ho­ri­zon. Just one-fourth of those polled said they are con­fid­ent Obama and Con­gress will reach a de­fi­cit agree­ment and avoid an­oth­er gov­ern­ment shut­down next year. Al­most three-fourths say they don’t have much con­fid­ence Wash­ing­ton can reach a deal. With in­siders in both parties gen­er­ally dis­count­ing the pos­sib­il­ity of an­oth­er shut­down, that sug­gests Wash­ing­ton, if noth­ing else, has suc­ceeded in lower­ing the pub­lic’s ex­pect­a­tions to a point where it might fi­nally sur­pass them.

What We're Following See More »
FROM YEARS AGO
Rep. Joe Barton Apologizes for Nude Selfie
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
THE QUESTION
How Many People Have Signed Up for Obamacare So Far?
11 hours ago
THE ANSWER

About 2.3 million, after three weeks of open enrollment. That exceeds the pace of sign-ups last year.

Source:
19 FACE-TO-FACE MEETINGS
Latest Count: 12 Trump Campaign Staffers Had Contact with Russians
14 hours ago
THE LATEST
AT ISSUE: COMEY FIRING, SESSIONS’S RECUSAL
Mueller Seeks Documents from DOJ
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Special counsel Robert Mueller "is now demanding documents from the department overseeing his investigation." A source tells ABC News that "Mueller's investigators are keen to obtain emails related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the earlier decision of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the entire matter."

Source:
MULVANEY SAYS PROVISION ISN’T A DEALBREAKER
Trump May Be OK with Dropping Mandate Repeal
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump would not insist on including repeal of an Obama-era health insurance mandate in a bill intended to enact the biggest overhaul of the tax code since the 1980s, a senior White House aide said on Sunday. The version of tax legislation put forward by Senate Republican leaders would remove a requirement in former President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law that taxes Americans who decline to buy health insurance."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login