Meet the Man Who Lost to Rob Ford

George Smitherman lost the 2010 race for mayor of Toronto to a man who has become the world’s political disaster porn. Here’s how it happened.

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford sits during a Toronto City Council meeting at City Hall on November 15, 2013 in Toronto, Canada .
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Nov. 19, 2013, midnight

In 2010, George Smither­man did something that today seems im­possible: The former deputy premi­er of Ontario lost the Toronto may­or­al elec­tion to Rob Ford, the one-man ab­surd­ist high­light reel.

Is Smither­man, who lost to Ford 47 per­cent to 36 per­cent, sur­prised at just how far the may­or has fallen? “You can’t look at a shit show like that and say that some of it doesn’t sur­prise you,” he tells Na­tion­al Journ­al. “But I think that in a cer­tain sense, you can see that there was a pol­ish placed around him that was kind of gruel thin.”

How did Ford win? Two cru­cial factors, ac­cord­ing to Smither­man: a lack of party polit­ics, and a con­ser­vat­ive-pop­u­list wave. “In 2010 in Toronto,” Smither­man tells Na­tion­al Journ­al, “there’s a fair bit of sim­il­ar­ity to the tea party dur­ing its as­cend­ency.” You had a situ­ation where an in­cum­bent, two-term may­or had bowed out, and there was a strong sense in the pub­lic that spend­ing was out of con­trol. “The Ford gang very ef­fect­ively defined the bal­lot ques­tion on this fisc­al basis, and neatly tied it up with a simple mes­sage around ‘stop the gravy train.’ “

Smither­man thinks he bore the brunt of Toronto’s anti-in­cum­bency fever, des­pite also be­ing “pissed off at [the may­or’s] pro­gress and his re­cord.” And once the, ac­cord­ing to Smither­man, ul­tra-right Ford was able to spin the more lib­er­al Smither­man as a politi­cian tied to that ad­min­is­tra­tion’s spend­ing, it was hard to change the dy­nam­ic.

Part of that dif­fi­culty came from Toronto’s polit­ic­al sys­tem, where parties are largely ab­sent. “It was ex­tremely dif­fi­cult to get kind of a head-to-head con­trast, be­cause there’s no party polit­ics at play in mu­ni­cip­al polit­ics in Toronto, and, ac­cord­ingly, no dis­cip­line on the num­ber of pro­filed can­did­ates.” Dozens of people ran for the may­or’s of­fice that year, and about five man­aged to stick out among the field, in­clud­ing Ford and Smither­man. Ford be­nefited, Smither­man says, by the massive roster. “He found a lot of com­fort and cov­er in the pack.”

But Smither­man, who is care­ful not to sound like he spends his time brood­ing over sour grapes, doesn’t just put all of the blame for his loss on out­side factors. “I was too nice,” he says. “I had a repu­ta­tion at one time in polit­ics where my nick­name was ‘Furi­ous George.’ But I ac­tu­ally did not bring that char­ac­ter to play hardly at all.”

As Smither­man has it, his re­luct­ance to jump in the mud with Ford, com­bined with the strong sup­port for Ford among the con­ser­vat­ive press com­pared to Smither­man’s tep­id sup­port from the lib­er­al press, en­sured that no one would really dig through Ford’s re­cord. In ret­ro­spect, Smither­man says, it was “al­most a little bit of uni­lat­er­al dis­arm­a­ment.”

Ford also man­aged to be­ne­fit some by play­ing off of Smither­man’s sexu­al­ity. The Ford cam­paign put “sub­stan­tial ef­fort” in­to draw­ing a con­trast between Ford as a “lov­ing fam­ily man” and Smither­man, who is gay.

But des­pite the ugly cam­paign and the ugly everything-that-came-after, Toronto may not be through with May­or Ford. Be­cause of the city’s first-past-the-post elect­or­al sys­tem, Smither­man can ima­gine scen­ari­os where Ford gets reelec­ted. “You usu­ally think of the old style ana­lys­is of the Re­pub­lic­ans, who cam­paign to the base and move to the cen­ter,” Smither­man says. “I’m not sure it works that way any­more with these tea-party people; they cam­paign to the right then they stay there. That’s this guy. But ima­gine you could get elec­ted with 33 or 34 per­cent of the vote.”

Toronto may just be able to for­give its ever-apo­lo­giz­ing may­or. “I sup­pose it is in our DNA,” says Smither­man, “a city that was able to for­give its hockey team for a third-peri­od col­lapse in the play­offs last year is per­haps a city built on more for­give­ness than seems ima­gin­able.”

Which isn’t to say that Ford is already on the road to re­demp­tion. “I’m amongst those that agrees that if this guy had said, ‘Yeah, I really fucked up, and I do have some prob­lems, and I’m go­ing to step out of my role for a couple of months,’ if he had done that step and come back in­to it 10, or 20, or 30 pounds light­er, etcetra, etcetra, he really would’ve had the po­ten­tial to have the wind at his back. Now, he squandered that.”

Smither­man him­self isn’t look­ing for a 2014 re­match against the may­or. He sees a crazy year com­ing, no mat­ter how little power Ford tech­nic­ally re­tains. But he holds hope that Toronto will re­ject the forces that first re­jec­ted him. “There’s people of a cer­tain class and char­ac­ter, even if they like the fisc­al bit of it, you can only hold your nose so much be­fore it starts to hurt.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×