In the wake of HealthCare.gov’s persistent troubles, the president and members of Congress from both parties voiced support for government information technology procurement reform.
“This is part of a pattern that occurs due to failure to adhere to the private sector’s world-class standards for IT production,” said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., at a House Oversight Committee hearing last week.
Given that the United States federal goverment one of the largest purchasers of IT, making the investment worthwhile ought to be a top concern of lawmakers. In 2012, the U.S. spent approximately $81 billion on federal IT projects, and HealthCare.gov alone received a $630 million allocation.
Earlier this year Issa joined hands with Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., to craft the Federal IT Acquisition Reform Act (FITARA), which passed the House over the summer but awaits its day in the Senate. Among other provisions, the bill grants chief information officers authority over agency budgets and raises them to the level of presidential appointee, heightening their responsibility over large-scale IT projects.
The Health and Human Services Department and its Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services faced a wave of criticism for its mismanagement of the federal exchange website. In a series of hearings with top HHS and CMS officials, it became clear that functionality and security decisions that resulted in the site blocking hundreds of thousands of users from completing applications for health insurance were made in the lower ranks and not communicated at the top.
FITARA could be the legislation to stop such problems from happening again.
“If FITARA had been law during the development of HealthCare.gov,” Connolly said in an email, “President Obama would have been authorized to appoint his own chief information officer at the Department of Health and Human Services, and this individual would have both served as Secretary Sebelius’s primary adviser on IT management, and been empowered to recruit top IT talent and manage critical IT investments, such as HealthCare.gov.”
Despite the added prestige of presidential appointment, it will be hard for the government to compete with private sector salaries to attract top IT managers.
“When you rely on contractors — which is common practice in government — you need to possess the core capability within the agency to manage them,” said Gwanhoo Lee, an IT professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business. “I don’t know whether bringing in private sector managers would solve this problem, but I can’t imagine that those managers — who would make hundreds of thousands of dollars at places like Google and Facebook — that those individuals are willing to come to the public sector.”
Connolly acknowledged that FITARA is only a start, and that the government must do more to open up the contracting process to younger companies, thereby upping competition and attracting a wider swath of talent. Clay Johnson, former presidential innovation fellow and current CEO at The Department of Better Technology — a firm that builds government software — said one way to do that is to allow smaller, more modular purchasing, which would make it easier for smaller businesses to compete for the contracts and reduce the impact when projects go sour.
“If a few fail, at least it’s a half million mistake, rather than a half billion,” Johnson said.
With the spotlight on HealthCare.gov, Johnson said he thinks more House Democrats will introduce government IT reform initiatives in the coming weeks.
“This is a moment where both parties can agree,” he said.
The private sector is jumping on board too. Amazon sent a letter of endorsement to the leaders of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, which is currently reviewing FITARA.
Whether FITARA will move through the Senate is unclear, but with more proposals on the horizon — and the president’s call to action — the debate is far from over.
What We're Following See More »
Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.
And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."
The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.