Red-state Democrats always knew Obamacare would be a problem during next year’s midterm election. But a new poll released Tuesday shows just how daunting a threat it is.
An imposing plurality of adults in states that backed Mitt Romney last year say they are more likely to oppose than support a lawmaker who backs the health care law, according to an ABC News/Washington Post survey. Forty-six percent of red-state citizens said they’d be less inclined to support the candidate; only 15 percent said they’d be more inclined.
Overall, the law’s unpopularity has dipped far lower since its disastrous rollout, with disapproval of the Affordable Care Act among all adults spiking considerably since last month.
Those numbers draw a bull’s-eye on the back of the four red-state Democratic incumbents who voted for the health care reform in 2010 and are up for reelection in 2014: Mary Landrieu in Louisiana, Mark Begich in Alaska, Mark Pryor in Arkansas, and Kay Hagan in North Carolina. Each already faces a slim path to victory in their respective conservative-leaning states, one narrowed further by the law’s increasing unpopularity. There’s little remaining doubt that the law, even with elections a year away, will play a defining role in the 2014 races, and how Democrats handle the issue will largely determine whether the party retains its Senate majority.
It’s also a warning for Senate Democratic candidates running in other red states, such as Michelle Nunn in Georgia and Kentucky’s Alison Lundergan Grimes. Unlike their incumbent counterparts, they didn’t vote for the law, but Republicans will nonetheless aggressively link it to them throughout their campaign.
Among all adults nationwide, 37 percent said backing Obamacare would make them less likely to support a candidate, while 21 percent said the opposite. That’s the biggest gap the poll has ever recorded, The Post reported.
Thirty-five percent of independents say support for the law would make them less likely to vote for a lawmaker, while 18 percent say they’d be more likely to support them. The results are more discouraging for Democrats among whites, who constitute the vast bulk of voters in 2014 battlegrounds like Arkansas — 46 percent to 20 percent.
Making matters worse for Democrats, the law has taken a heavy toll on President Obama’s own approval ratings. Just 42 percent now back the president’s performance, the poll found, the lowest point recorded for Obama by the ABC/Post survey. The poll was conducted Nov. 14-17 and surveyed 1,006 adults nationwide. The margin of error for the full survey is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points, though the margin of error is higher for subgroups.
Democrats running in 2014, including a pair of House Democrats running for the Senate, have aggressively sought changes to the law in recent weeks. They’ve voted to let insurance companies resell their existing health plans, enrolled in the health care exchanges themselves, and ordered investigations into why the White House’s implementation has been so rocky — moves designed to put distance between themselves and the law’s struggling rollout.
Their actions suggest the Democratic Party still believes that even as voters grow increasingly angry with Obamacare, they want to fix — not repeal — the law. That’s the frame operatives hoped to use before the disastrous rollout, one many were confident would turn the reform into a winning issue for the party. There’s evidence they’re still right.
The latest United Technologies/National Journal Congressional Connection Poll, also released Tuesday, found that support for outright repeal of the law has not grown since July. Thirty-eight percent said Obamacare should be repealed, compared with 35 percent who said lawmakers should “wait and see how things go before making any changes.” Those numbers are largely unchanged since the summer.
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”