Watch Out, Red-State Democrats

A new poll finds opposition to Obamacare deepening, especially in 2014 battleground states.

Mary Landrieu (D-LA) speaks with journalists at the 2008 State of the Union address on January 28, 2008.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
Nov. 19, 2013, 6:04 a.m.

Red-state Demo­crats al­ways knew Obama­care would be a prob­lem dur­ing next year’s midterm elec­tion. But a new poll re­leased Tues­day shows just how daunt­ing a threat it is.

An im­pos­ing plur­al­ity of adults in states that backed Mitt Rom­ney last year say they are more likely to op­pose than sup­port a law­maker who backs the health care law, ac­cord­ing to an ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post sur­vey. Forty-six per­cent of red-state cit­izens said they’d be less in­clined to sup­port the can­did­ate; only 15 per­cent said they’d be more in­clined.

Over­all, the law’s un­pop­ular­ity has dipped far lower since its dis­astrous rol­lout, with dis­ap­prov­al of the Af­ford­able Care Act among all adults spik­ing con­sid­er­ably since last month.

Those num­bers draw a bull’s-eye on the back of the four red-state Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bents who voted for the health care re­form in 2010 and are up for reelec­tion in 2014: Mary Landrieu in Louisi­ana, Mark Be­gich in Alaska, Mark Pry­or in Arkan­sas, and Kay Hagan in North Car­o­lina. Each already faces a slim path to vic­tory in their re­spect­ive con­ser­vat­ive-lean­ing states, one nar­rowed fur­ther by the law’s in­creas­ing un­pop­ular­ity. There’s little re­main­ing doubt that the law, even with elec­tions a year away, will play a de­fin­ing role in the 2014 races, and how Demo­crats handle the is­sue will largely de­term­ine wheth­er the party re­tains its Sen­ate ma­jor­ity.

It’s also a warn­ing for Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates run­ning in oth­er red states, such as Michelle Nunn in Geor­gia and Ken­tucky’s Al­is­on Lun­der­gan Grimes. Un­like their in­cum­bent coun­ter­parts, they didn’t vote for the law, but Re­pub­lic­ans will non­ethe­less ag­gress­ively link it to them throughout their cam­paign.

Among all adults na­tion­wide, 37 per­cent said back­ing Obama­care would make them less likely to sup­port a can­did­ate, while 21 per­cent said the op­pos­ite. That’s the biggest gap the poll has ever re­cor­ded, The Post re­por­ted.

Thirty-five per­cent of in­de­pend­ents say sup­port for the law would make them less likely to vote for a law­maker, while 18 per­cent say they’d be more likely to sup­port them. The res­ults are more dis­cour­aging for Demo­crats among whites, who con­sti­tute the vast bulk of voters in 2014 battle­grounds like Arkan­sas — 46 per­cent to 20 per­cent.

Mak­ing mat­ters worse for Demo­crats, the law has taken a heavy toll on Pres­id­ent Obama’s own ap­prov­al rat­ings. Just 42 per­cent now back the pres­id­ent’s per­form­ance, the poll found, the low­est point re­cor­ded for Obama by the ABC/Post sur­vey. The poll was con­duc­ted Nov. 14-17 and sur­veyed 1,006 adults na­tion­wide. The mar­gin of er­ror for the full sur­vey is plus or minus 3.5 per­cent­age points, though the mar­gin of er­ror is high­er for sub­groups.

Demo­crats run­ning in 2014, in­clud­ing a pair of House Demo­crats run­ning for the Sen­ate, have ag­gress­ively sought changes to the law in re­cent weeks. They’ve voted to let in­sur­ance com­pan­ies re­sell their ex­ist­ing health plans, en­rolled in the health care ex­changes them­selves, and ordered in­vest­ig­a­tions in­to why the White House’s im­ple­ment­a­tion has been so rocky — moves de­signed to put dis­tance between them­selves and the law’s strug­gling rol­lout.

Their ac­tions sug­gest the Demo­crat­ic Party still be­lieves that even as voters grow in­creas­ingly angry with Obama­care, they want to fix — not re­peal — the law. That’s the frame op­er­at­ives hoped to use be­fore the dis­astrous rol­lout, one many were con­fid­ent would turn the re­form in­to a win­ning is­sue for the party. There’s evid­ence they’re still right.

The latest United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion Poll, also re­leased Tues­day, found that sup­port for out­right re­peal of the law has not grown since Ju­ly. Thirty-eight per­cent said Obama­care should be re­pealed, com­pared with 35 per­cent who said law­makers should “wait and see how things go be­fore mak­ing any changes.” Those num­bers are largely un­changed since the sum­mer.

What We're Following See More »
AT ISSUE: COMEY FIRING, SESSIONS’S RECUSAL
Mueller Seeks Documents from DOJ
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Special counsel Robert Mueller "is now demanding documents from the department overseeing his investigation." A source tells ABC News that "Mueller's investigators are keen to obtain emails related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the earlier decision of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the entire matter."

Source:
MULVANEY SAYS PROVISION ISN’T A DEALBREAKER
Trump May Be OK with Dropping Mandate Repeal
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump would not insist on including repeal of an Obama-era health insurance mandate in a bill intended to enact the biggest overhaul of the tax code since the 1980s, a senior White House aide said on Sunday. The version of tax legislation put forward by Senate Republican leaders would remove a requirement in former President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law that taxes Americans who decline to buy health insurance."

Source:
FRANKEN JUST THE BEGINNING?
Media Devoting More Resources to Lawmakers’ Sexual Misconduct
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Members of Congress with histories of mistreating women should be extremely nervous. Major outlets, including CNN, are dedicating substantial newsroom resources to investigating sexual harassment allegations against numerous lawmakers. A Republican source told me he's gotten calls from well-known D.C. reporters who are gathering stories about sleazy members."

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
2 days ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
2 days ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login