One of Ben Bernanke’s goals when he became chairman of the Federal Reserve was to make the historically secretive central bank more transparent. The hope was that the economy would reap the benefits.
On Tuesday night, just 10 weeks from the end of his eight-year term as Fed chairman and with the economy still far from its pre-financial-crisis strength, he explained and defended those efforts.
“The Federal Reserve, like many central banks around the world, has made significant progress in recent years in clarifying its goals and policy approach, and in providing regular information about the future path of policy that it views as most likely to attain its objectives,” Bernanke said in remarks prepared for a speech at the National Economists Club’s annual dinner in Washington.
“This increased transparency about the framework of policy has aided the public in forming policy expectations, reduced uncertainty, and made policy more effective,” Bernanke said.
The former Princeton University professor made communications a signature issue during his term as head of the Fed. In late 2007, not quite two years into his chairmanship, he gave a speech on the same topic in which he declared “good communications” to be a prerequisite for sound monetary policymaking, and transparency a boon to the effectiveness of those policies.
According to Bernanke, that’s because people with greater certainty about the economy will make better-informed financial decisions; financial markets with greater understanding of how policy and data intersect are more likely to drive asset prices and bond yields in ways that help the central bank achieve its goals; and providing some clarity could help anchor the public’s inflation expectations over the long run.
The Bernanke Fed took a number of steps in an effort to achieve those ends. In 2011, for example, the central bank launched regular quarterly press conferences with the chairman. It adopted an explicit inflation target of 2 percent in 2012, and began explicitly tying its guidance for when it would raise its benchmark interest rate to economic conditions.
The move toward greater openness faced criticism this fall when the Fed surprised markets by not beginning to taper its monthly $85 billion bond-buying program. Some Fed-watchers questioned whether the central bank’s newfound chattiness was causing confusion and sending mixed signals.
Bernanke defended the Fed’s decision to keep its bond-buying program steady, despite expectations, on Tuesday. “Although the [Fed’s] decision came as a surprise to some market participants, it appears to have strengthened the credibility of [the Fed’s monetary policy-setting committee’s] forward rate guidance,” Bernanke said.
Janet Yellen, the Fed’s vice chair and President Obama’s choice to replace Bernanke when his term expires in January, has pledged to maintain the focus on communications as a monetary-policy tool. “To diminish unnecessary volatility, I think we have to redouble our efforts to communicate as clearly as we possibly can,” she told members of the Senate Banking Committee at her nomination hearing last week.
Neither Bernanke nor Yellen supports legislation proposed by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., that would allow the Fed’s monetary policy decisions to be audited. Right now, the central bank’s books are subject to a regular audit, but the details of its policy-setting decisions are more closely held. Fed officials have said they worry such probing would put a damper on their discussions.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.