Fracking Boom Fractures the Environmental Movement

Shane Davis, a self-described "fractivist" gives a tour of oil and gas operations throughout Weld County, Colo
National Journal
Amy Harder
See more stories about...
Amy Harder
Nov. 20, 2013, 4:31 p.m.

FIRE­STONE, Colo. — If you look closely at the fights over en­ergy de­vel­op­ment in Col­or­ado, you can see the full spec­trum of po­s­i­tions evolving among na­tion­al en­vir­on­ment­al groups on what role, if any, nat­ur­al gas should play in the quest to com­bat glob­al warm­ing.

Be­fore the frack­ing boom of the last five years, nat­ur­al gas was widely con­sidered by en­vir­on­ment­al­ists to be a “bridge” fuel that could help the U.S. cut green­house gases while it de­veloped more re­new­able en­ergy, largely be­cause gas pro­duces far few­er car­bon emis­sions than coal or oil.

Now, with burn­ing of nat­ur­al gas grow­ing at un­pre­ced­en­ted levels, the en­vir­on­ment­al com­munity is be­com­ing frag­men­ted on the is­sue of how much it should be used.

On one end of the spec­trum are grass­roots or­gan­izers like Shane Dav­is, a self-de­scribed “fract­iv­ist” who is op­posed to frack­ing and by ex­ten­sion all fossil-fuel de­vel­op­ment. He is the re­gion­al dir­ect­or in Col­or­ado for Josh Fox, pro­du­cer of the anti-frack­ing film Gasland. Dav­is is part of a re­l­at­ively small but loud and in­flu­en­tial seg­ment of grass­roots or­gan­izers fight­ing to stop frack­ing not just to pre­vent glob­al warm­ing, but to pro­tect so­cial val­ues.

“This is not an anti-frack­ing fight any­more. Now it’s a civil-rights move­ment,” Dav­is said on Elec­tion Day this year while driv­ing around Weld County — Col­or­ado’s frack­ing epi­cen­ter with more than 15,000 wells. “Our civil rights to safety and pro­tec­tion have been taken away from us.”

Dav­is’s po­s­i­tion is aligned with cer­tain na­tion­al groups also op­posed to all fossil fuels, in­clud­ing Food & Wa­ter Watch and the Si­erra Club, one of the world’s old­est and most in­flu­en­tial en­vir­on­ment­al or­gan­iz­a­tions. After years of sup­port­ing nat­ur­al gas as a bridge fuel to re­new­able en­ergy and even tak­ing money from the gas in­dustry, the Si­erra Club form­ally changed its po­s­i­tion last year in the name of glob­al warm­ing. The group now does not ne­go­ti­ate with or take money from the gas in­dustry.

“As more in­form­a­tion came out and frack­ing ex­ploded across the coun­try, we ad­jus­ted our policy,” Si­erra Club Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or Mi­chael Brune told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily in an in­ter­view this week. “It’s the fun­da­ment­al con­cern we have. We think gas of­fers a false hope of ar­rest­ing cli­mate change.” The group is con­sid­er­ing mov­ing up by 20 years — from 2050 to 2030 — its goal to wean the na­tion’s power sec­tor off coal and nat­ur­al gas, which right now com­bined ac­count for al­most 70 per­cent of U.S. elec­tri­city.

Rep. Jared Pol­is, D-Colo., who rep­res­ents four Col­or­ado com­munit­ies that voted earli­er this month to ban frack­ing, said he doesn’t think many en­vir­on­ment­al groups, in­clud­ing the Si­erra Club, are op­posed to nat­ur­al gas out­right.

“Those are really the fringe views,” Pol­is said. “There are not many in the en­vir­on­ment­al com­munity that say all en­ergy will be re­new­able to­mor­row.”

The Si­erra Club and Food & Wa­ter Watch were among the largest na­tion­al groups sup­port­ing the anti-frack­ing meas­ures in Pol­is’s dis­trict.

At the oth­er end of the spec­trum is the En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund, an or­gan­iz­a­tion known for its in­flu­en­tial col­lab­or­a­tion with the oil and gas in­dustry on tough­er drilling reg­u­la­tions. EDF helped broker an agree­ment — an­nounced this week by Demo­crat­ic Gov. John Hick­en­loop­er of Col­or­ado — with a trio of oil and gas com­pan­ies that cre­ates the first-ever state reg­u­la­tion for meth­ane, a po­tent green­house gas that can be re­leased from frack­ing op­er­a­tions.

“This pro­pos­al rep­res­ents a mod­el for the na­tion,” EDF Pres­id­ent Fred Krupp said after this week’s an­nounce­ment. When asked about oth­er groups’ in­sist­ence not to ne­go­ti­ate for stronger rules, Mark Brown­stein, as­so­ci­ate vice pres­id­ent for EDF’s U.S. en­ergy and cli­mate pro­gram, re­spon­ded: “The ques­tion is not wheth­er you like gas or hate gas, it’s what you do to pro­tect a com­munity from the en­vir­on­ment­al risks for however long you’re go­ing to use gas.”

The gulf between the po­s­i­tions of EDF and groups like the Si­erra Club has grown amid the frack­ing boom.

“It’s brought some of the is­sues to the fore­front that have al­ways been present but were more eas­ily avoided in the past,” said Ro­ger Pielke Jr., a pro­fess­or of en­vir­on­ment­al stud­ies at the Uni­versity of Col­or­ado in Boulder, one of the four Front Range cit­ies that voted to ban frack­ing earli­er this month. “What the frack­ing boom is show­ing is that ar­gu­ments that hinge on scarcity are not at least for the fore­see­able fu­ture go­ing to be the path for­ward if we’re go­ing to trans­form the en­ergy sys­tem.”

Brune, the Si­erra Club’s lead­er, said, “It is true, we have dif­fer­ent po­s­i­tions on nat­ur­al gas and the de­gree to which we’re fo­cus­ing on in­creas­ing clean en­ergy.” So does this cause dis­cord with­in the en­vir­on­ment­al com­munity? “Yes,” Brune said, opt­ing not to say more.

“I don’t think ne­ces­sar­ily I want to [elab­or­ate] be­cause I’m more in­ter­ested in find­ing ways for en­vir­on­ment­al groups to sup­port each oth­er at pre­vent­ing frack­ing from ex­pand­ing, while help­ing com­munit­ies to pro­tect their air and wa­ter where frack­ing might already be oc­cur­ring.”

Back in Weld County, Dav­is wasn’t as re­served.

“My per­son­al opin­ion is they [EDF] are a dis­grace to the en­vir­on­ment,” Dav­is said, ac­cus­ing the group of a “derel­ic­tion of duty.”

Mean­while, the Uni­on of Con­cerned Sci­ent­ists, whose most re­cent pres­id­ent, Kev­in Knobloch, stepped down to be­come chief of staff to En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz, rep­res­ents a middle part of the spec­trum. The group is go­ing to help in­form com­munit­ies along Col­or­ado’s Front Range with “toolkits” that in­clude ba­sic facts about the pros and cons of oil and gas drilling.

“If it’s go­ing to be done, com­munit­ies should have ac­cess to in­form­a­tion about the risks and the be­ne­fits about it to help in­form their de­cisions,” said Gretchen Gold­man, an ana­lyst at the group’s Cen­ter for Sci­ence and Demo­cracy. UCS has already helped some com­munit­ies in Cali­for­nia, and Col­or­ado is next on its list. Mis­in­form­a­tion about frack­ing “comes from all sides,” Gold­man said. “It really demon­strates what a high-stakes de­bate this is.”

What We're Following See More »
IF HE’LL JUST LISTEN…
Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
16 minutes ago
THE DETAILS
INCLUDING CLINTON
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Source:
AT LEAST NOT YET
Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"

Source:
‘NO MORAL OR ETHICAL GROUNDING’
Sen. Murphy: Trump Shouldn’t Get Classified Briefigs
19 hours ago
THE LATEST
×