Amendment Snafu Snags Defense Bill

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 15: U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) walks through the Capitol Building on October 15, 2013 in Washington, DC. The government has been shut down for 14 days.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Nov. 20, 2013, 5:06 p.m.

The an­nu­al bill to au­thor­ize de­fense pro­grams hit a land mine Wed­nes­day when Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans ob­jec­ted that Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., was re­fus­ing to al­low de­bate on their amend­ments. Some charged that Re­id was shield­ing Pres­id­ent Obama from an un­wanted de­bate on new Ir­an sanc­tions.

The Sen­ate was ex­pec­ted to vote Wed­nes­day even­ing on com­pet­ing amend­ments to ad­dress sexu­al as­sault in the mil­it­ary from Sens. Kirsten Gil­librand, D-N.Y., and Claire Mc­Caskill, D-Mo., but the plan blew up when Re­id could not get a un­an­im­ous-con­sent agree­ment to move for­ward.

“We just ran in­to the ditch,” said Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, after Re­id tem­por­ar­ily aban­doned his ef­fort to bring de­bate on the amend­ments to a close.

Later in the even­ing, Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber James In­hofe, R-Okla., an­nounced a com­prom­ise pro­pos­al: Sen­at­ors from both parties could each bring 25 amend­ments to the floor, or half the num­ber sought by Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, lead­er of the Steer­ing Com­mit­tee for Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans. “If we re­fuse to do that, I am go­ing to go ahead and vote to sup­port clo­ture and sup­port our bill,” In­hofe said.

Shortly after In­hofe offered the plan, Re­id re­turned to the floor and filed a clo­ture mo­tion on the de­fense bill, set­ting up a vote for Fri­day on wheth­er to end de­bate. That gives both sides time to try and work out an agree­ment on amend­ments Thursday.

Frus­tra­tion from Re­pub­lic­ans who want to have a broad­er de­bate on a range of is­sues and push for­ward ad­di­tion­al Ir­an sanc­tions simmered for much of the day Wed­nes­day while sen­at­ors on the floor de­bated the Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill amend­ments.

Gil­librand con­tin­ued to lobby hol­d­outs to try to per­suade them to sup­port her meas­ure, which the Pentagon vo­ci­fer­ously op­poses. It would take the de­cision of wheth­er to pro­sec­ute mil­it­ary sexu­al as­saults out of the chain of com­mand.

By late Wed­nes­day, Gil­librand had won a few more sup­port­ers, in­clud­ing Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Sher­rod Brown, D-Ohio, and Chris Murphy, D-Conn., bring­ing her list of known back­ers to 53. But 60 votes are needed to move to a fi­nal vote on the amend­ment, and it ap­pears doubt­ful Gil­librand will clear that hurdle. It is more likely that the Sen­ate would in­stead ad­opt a far more mod­er­ate amend­ment from Mc­Caskill and Sens. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., and Deb Fisc­her, R-Neb. Their amend­ment, which has been cri­ti­cized by vic­tims-ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tions who say it main­tains the status quo, would al­low sexu­al-as­sault vic­tims to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charges from the ser­vice and would add ad­di­tion­al checks over com­mand­ers’ pro­sec­u­tion de­cisions.

Sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans said anxi­ety that Re­id would not al­low any ad­di­tion­al amend­ments to be con­sidered after the two planned votes on the sexu­al-as­sault amend­ments led to the ob­jec­tion to pro­ceed from Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.

Coburn is seek­ing con­sid­er­a­tion of at least eight amend­ments to cut costs in the De­fense De­part­ment, par­tic­u­larly one that would audit the Pentagon. “We have a Rules Com­mit­tee of one now,” Coburn said. “The ma­jor­ity wants to pick our amend­ments, even rel­ev­ant amend­ments. That is not the way the Sen­ate is sup­posed to work. That totally denies me my right as a minor­ity sen­at­or to of­fer im­prove­ments to the bill.”

Coburn said his audit amend­ment would save $25 bil­lion and he has sev­er­al oth­ers he is push­ing but is not de­mand­ing a vote on each of them. “I have all sorts of oth­er amend­ments that will save a ton of money in the Pentagon…. And I can’t get a guar­an­tee that I can get a vote,” he said.

Coburn said that a vote to table his amend­ment or to in­clude it in a man­ager’s amend­ment would sat­is­fy him.

In­hofe said that Coburn was put­ting to­geth­er a re­vised pro­pos­al that would al­low lim­ited de­bate on some rel­ev­ant or re­lated amend­ments, but there was an­oth­er, largely un­spoken con­cern among Re­pub­lic­ans. A num­ber of GOP sen­at­ors would like to bring up amend­ments to im­pose new sanc­tions on Ir­an un­less it pulls back on its nuc­le­ar am­bi­tions, but Demo­crats know that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion does not want that pub­lic de­bate in the midst of talks in the Middle East. “That is the one that the pres­id­ent is say­ing he doesn’t want con­sidered,” In­hofe said.

Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., said he sus­pec­ted the hol­dup Wed­nes­day likely had to do with con­cerns about the abil­ity to ad­dress Ir­an sanc­tions. “I don’t know if this is Ir­an,” he said. “Something is driv­ing this, be­cause I’m ready to vote on this thing,” he ad­ded, re­fer­ring to the sexu­al-as­sault is­sue.

“Ir­an looms large here. I don’t know. I can’t ex­plain to you why we are hav­ing this prob­lem. It’s the only thing I can think of,” Gra­ham said.

Earli­er in the day, oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans soun­ded off on Ir­an.

“My hope is that we will con­tin­ue to in­crease sanc­tions,” said Sen. Marco Ru­bio, R-Fla. “I don’t know if we will get an op­por­tun­ity to do that pro­ced­ur­ally on this bill, but I think we need to con­tin­ue to push for­ward on that.”

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a co­spon­sor of an Ir­an-sanc­tions amend­ment offered to the de­fense bill from Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., said that a group of Re­pub­lic­ans were still push­ing for an op­por­tun­ity to con­sider ad­di­tion­al Ir­an sanc­tions.

“Sen­at­or Re­id is the one who ba­sic­ally con­trols wheth­er we get a vote on the Ir­an-sanc­tions amend­ment, and … I’m very con­cerned that Sec­ret­ary [of State John] Kerry and the pres­id­ent des­per­ately want a deal, and what usu­ally hap­pens then is you get a bad deal,” Cornyn said.

“We are still try­ing to work through that. We need to max­im­ize our ne­go­ti­at­ing lever­age, not min­im­ize it.”

Re­id said there have been 350 amend­ments filed on the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill, but that every time he reaches a tent­at­ive agree­ment with Re­pub­lic­ans they move the goal­posts.

“We are not in a po­s­i­tion to deal with this for all the reas­ons that we have talked about here for sev­er­al months,” he said on the floor. “We are not ser­i­ously le­gis­lat­ing any­more….”

Re­id said that reach­ing agree­ments on lim­ited amend­ments doesn’t work, be­cause if 13 are agreed to, as had been dis­cussed, then mem­bers just turn around and ask for more. He pressed for votes on the sexu­al-as­sault amend­ments.

Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Chair­man Carl Lev­in, D-Mich., ar­gued that if the Sen­ate can­not com­plete the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion bill this week, it stands in jeop­ardy of not be­ing con­fer­enced with the House and en­acted for the first time in 52 years. That is be­cause there will be only one week after the Thanks­giv­ing re­cess when both the House and Sen­ate are in ses­sion.

“We need to get this bill fin­ished this week, or else we are not go­ing to get a con­fer­ence re­port,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
CONTRARY TO REPORTS
Ryan Not Endorsing Trump Just Yet
30 minutes ago
THE LATEST
SHORT ON LACTATION STATIONS, CHANGING TABLES
U.S. Capitol Doesn’t Meet Standards for New Moms
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The U.S. Capitol does not meet the federal government’s own standards for accommodations for new mothers," according to an investigation by NBC Channel 4. "Though the U.S. General Services Administration, a government agency which oversees the management of federal government buildings, requires a minimum number of lactation stations and changing tables, Congress is exempt from the rules and fails to meet those standards." The Capitol grounds have 12 lactations stations, far short of the 42 that would be required given the number of female workers there.

Source:
OTHER SECRETARIES AT FAULT, TOO
State Dept. Review Faults Clinton Email Management
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A State Department audit has faulted Hillary Clinton and previous secretaries of state for poorly managing email and other computer information and slowly responding to new cybersecurity risks. ... It cites 'longstanding, systemic weaknesses' related to communications. These started before Clinton's appointment as secretary of state, but her failures were singled out as more serious."

Source:
CRUZ STILL TOOK DELEGATES AT THE CONVENTION
Trump Rolls in Washington Primary
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Donald Trump "was on course to win more than three-quarters of the vote in Washington's primary" last night. Ted Cruz's defunct candidacy still pulled about 10 percent. "Cruz dropped out of the race on May 3, but won 40 of the state's 41 delegates up for grabs at last weekend's state GOP convention."

Source:
MULTIPLE OFFICERS INJURED
Trump Rally Turns Violent in New Mexico
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"What started as a calm protest outside Donald Trump’s rally Tuesday erupted into fiery violence as protesters jumped on police cars, smashed windows and fought with Trump supporters and police. Police faced such an angry crowd that they called in reinforcements from around the state, seeking to double their numbers to counter the protesters, whose numbers swelled beyond 600." Protesters threw rocks and bottles at police, who broke up several fights. 

Source:
×