The House voted 235-187 Wednesday to pass a bill that would block proposed Interior Department regulations on hydraulic fracturing from taking effect in states where rules are already on the books.
Republicans cheered passage of the bill, which has little chance of advancing in the Senate, as a step forward for states’ rights and, they framed the issue as an attempt to defend oil and gas production from unnecessary government regulation.
“States have been effectively regulating hydraulic fracturing on both government and privately owned lands for decades,” Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas, the bill’s sponsor, said in a statement following passage, adding, “They have consistently opposed the federal government trying to trump state expertise in this area. In order to protect American jobs and American energy production, we must limit the federal government’s ability to slow down energy production on taxpayer owned federal lands with duplicative regulations and unnecessary red tape.”
House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings, R-Wash., similarly applauded passage of the measure, saying it would defend the domestic oil and gas boom from heavy-handed attempts by the administration to slow production.
“Today, the House of Representatives took an important step forward to protecting jobs and American energy production. This bipartisan legislation ensures that duplicative federal hydraulic-fracturing regulations do not stand in the way of increased American energy production,” Hastings said in a statement.
Democrats decried the bill as a conservative messaging push and warned that it would prevent necessary oversight.
“The latest Republican attack on critical health, safety, and environmental protections is being sold as a so-called ‘states’ rights bill’ that would only block a proposed fracking rule,” Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., said in a statement. “But it is written so poorly, and so broadly, it would essentially strip the federal government’s authority to enforce nearly any regulation on the books related to drilling and drilling impacts. It would truly allow companies on public lands to drill anywhere, at anytime, with no rules. Republicans have wasted yet another day with extreme, campaign talking point legislation that has no chance in the Senate.”
Green groups also slammed the legislative proposal as a threat to public health and the environment.
“Fracking is already wreaking havoc on our environment and health. America’s public lands”“from the White River National Forest in Colorado to Chaco Canyon in New Mexico”“should be protected for all Americans to enjoy. However, this reckless bill puts our special places and the communities that rely on them for drinking water and recreation at risk from fracking,” Courtney Abrams, director of Environment America’s Federal Clean Water Program said in a statement.
What We're Following See More »
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."