The House voted 235-187 Wednesday to pass a bill that would block proposed Interior Department regulations on hydraulic fracturing from taking effect in states where rules are already on the books.
Republicans cheered passage of the bill, which has little chance of advancing in the Senate, as a step forward for states’ rights and, they framed the issue as an attempt to defend oil and gas production from unnecessary government regulation.
“States have been effectively regulating hydraulic fracturing on both government and privately owned lands for decades,” Rep. Bill Flores, R-Texas, the bill’s sponsor, said in a statement following passage, adding, “They have consistently opposed the federal government trying to trump state expertise in this area. In order to protect American jobs and American energy production, we must limit the federal government’s ability to slow down energy production on taxpayer owned federal lands with duplicative regulations and unnecessary red tape.”
House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings, R-Wash., similarly applauded passage of the measure, saying it would defend the domestic oil and gas boom from heavy-handed attempts by the administration to slow production.
“Today, the House of Representatives took an important step forward to protecting jobs and American energy production. This bipartisan legislation ensures that duplicative federal hydraulic-fracturing regulations do not stand in the way of increased American energy production,” Hastings said in a statement.
Democrats decried the bill as a conservative messaging push and warned that it would prevent necessary oversight.
“The latest Republican attack on critical health, safety, and environmental protections is being sold as a so-called ‘states’ rights bill’ that would only block a proposed fracking rule,” Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., said in a statement. “But it is written so poorly, and so broadly, it would essentially strip the federal government’s authority to enforce nearly any regulation on the books related to drilling and drilling impacts. It would truly allow companies on public lands to drill anywhere, at anytime, with no rules. Republicans have wasted yet another day with extreme, campaign talking point legislation that has no chance in the Senate.”
Green groups also slammed the legislative proposal as a threat to public health and the environment.
“Fracking is already wreaking havoc on our environment and health. America’s public lands”“from the White River National Forest in Colorado to Chaco Canyon in New Mexico”“should be protected for all Americans to enjoy. However, this reckless bill puts our special places and the communities that rely on them for drinking water and recreation at risk from fracking,” Courtney Abrams, director of Environment America’s Federal Clean Water Program said in a statement.
What We're Following See More »
In the The White House on Thursday night unveiled a series of executive actions to combat money laundering—"among the most comprehensive response yet to the Panama Papers revelations." The president's orders will tighten transparency rules, close loopholes that allow "foreigners to hide financial activity behind anonymous entities in the U.S., and demand stricter “customer due diligence” rules for banks.
The #NeverTrump movement is now mulling the idea of recruiting a candidate to run as an independent or under a third-party banner. But who might it be? The Hill offers a preliminary list.
- Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE)
- Mitt Romney
- 2012 (and perhaps 2016) Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson
- Former Marine Gen. John Kelly
- Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI)
- Former Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK)
- South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley
- Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
The U.S. economy added 160,000 jobs in April, a "mildly disappointing" result relative to the 200,000 expected, according to the New York Times' Neil Irwin. On the plus side, hourly earnings were up 2.5% from a year ago. But on the other hand, "the labor force shrank by 362,000 people and the labor force participation rate fell by 0.2 percentage points."
"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.