Republican members of the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation set their sights squarely on a takedown of the administration during a hearing Thursday to consider a series of bills responding to the closure of public lands during the government shutdown.
Measures to give states more authority over public lands were the main focus of the hearing, but the discussion devolved at times into attacks on President Obama.
“I see this government today as King George and his lords around him,” said Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, the author of a bill to give states a greater role in managing federal lands. “The American people have become the serfs, because we have to respond to the agencies. The president of the United States believes he’s a monarch. Shame on America.”
Subcommittee Chairman Rob Bishop, R-Utah, started the barrage with a critique of big government. “Large, centralized, bureaucratic entities don’t work; they don’t move us forward,” Bishop said in his opening statement.
There were some moments of togetherness. Rep. Steve Daines, R-Mont., sponsor of a measure directing the federal government to reimburse states for costs incurred in reopening national parks during the shutdown, applauded Democrats for supporting his legislation and indicated a willingness to reach across the aisle to strengthen bipartisan consensus on the issue.
“I want to thank the 26 bipartisan cosponsors on this legislation, many whom are representing states that stepped up to the challenge, as Utah did, to open up our parks while the Obama administration refused access during the partial lapse in appropriations,” he said. “It’s rare we see much bipartisan agreement in this town, [and] it is nice to see seven Democrats joining already as cosponsors on this bill on the House side.”
Subcommittee ranking member Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., dismissed the GOP attempts at outreach. “I’m glad to see the majority acknowledge that our national parks and wildlife refuges are economic engines in many of our rural economies,” he said. “But like so many of the majority’s bills considered by this committee, the legislation we will discuss today takes shared values and twists them into divisive, partisan extremes.”
Grijalva went on to say, “We should view this hearing like people view Doomsday-preppers — for its entertainment value only.”
The hearing comes on the heels of a major push this week by House Republicans for more states’ rights in energy development. The House on Thursday passed legislation that would speed federal review of cross-border oil and gas pipelines, while on Wednesday the chamber passed a bill to expand oil and natural gas drilling on public lands and to limit federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing.
The Senate is not expected to pass the three bills, and the White House has threatened to veto all of them.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.
"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."