Obamacare Enrollment Deadline Extended

A woman looks at the HealthCare.gov insurance exchange internet site October 1, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sophie Novack Sam Baker
Nov. 22, 2013, 9:04 a.m.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion pushed back an­oth­er Obama­care dead­line Fri­day, giv­ing con­sumers an ex­tra week to sign up for cov­er­age that be­gins on Jan. 1.

The Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices said Fri­day that the sign-up date for cov­er­age to be­gin Jan. 1 will be moved from Dec. 15 to Dec. 23. The fi­nal dead­line to sign up isn’t un­til March.

Some stake­hold­ers have spec­u­lated that CMS might delay the March 31 en­roll­ment cutoff, giv­ing con­sumers more time to sign up be­cause the prob­lems with Health­Care.gov ef­fect­ively shaved off one month from the en­roll­ment win­dow. CMS Com­mu­nic­a­tions Dir­ect­or Ju­lie Ba­taille said CMS is not con­sid­er­ing that op­tion “at this time.”

Ex­tend­ing the Dec. 15 dead­line to Dec. 23 will squeeze in­sur­ance com­pan­ies, who are still grap­pling with bad in­form­a­tion com­ing from the back end of Health­Care.gov.

“It makes it more chal­len­ging to pro­cess en­roll­ments in time for cov­er­age to be­gin on Jan. 1. Ul­ti­mately it will de­pend on how many people en­roll in those last few days,” said Robert Zirkel­bach, a spokes­man for Amer­ica’s Health In­sur­ance Plans.

The change was made “in con­sulta­tion with” the in­sur­ance in­dustry, Ba­taille said.

The on­go­ing prob­lems with Health­Care.gov have pre­ven­ted many from en­rolling in cov­er­age, and the short time frame be­fore the ori­gin­al Dec. 15 dead­line raised con­cerns about people hav­ing enough time to get on the site and suc­cess­fully find a plan. The ex­ten­sion to Dec. 23 could in­dic­ate a lack of con­fid­ence that the web­site will be fully func­tion­al by the end of Novem­ber.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has set the end of Novem­ber as the goal to have the fed­er­al on­line ex­change work­ing smoothly for the “vast ma­jor­ity of users,” which was later cla­ri­fied to mean 80 per­cent of con­sumers. Yet there have been doubts re­cently as to wheth­er that dead­line will be met.

Jeff Zi­ents, the former White House budget dir­ect­or who is co­ordin­at­ing the Health­Care.gov re­pair ef­fort, told re­port­ers that CMS is “on track” to meet its goals for the end of Novem­ber. By the end of the month, the site will be able to handle 50,000 users at once — the goal it was sup­posed to meet when it launched, Zi­ents said.

When more than 50,000 people try to use the site at once, and the site can’t handle it, users will be able to re­quest an email telling them when it’s OK to try again, Zi­ents said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×