How Will We Know the Obamacare Site Is Fixed?

With the administration’s deadline a week away, enrollment and website are improving — slowly.

Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management Jeff Zients (L) speaks on the budget impasse during a briefing in the Brady Briefing Room April 7, 2011 at the White House in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
Sam Baker
Nov. 24, 2013, 10:29 a.m.

With the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s dead­line to fix the Obama­care web­site less than a week away, one ques­tion is bound to weigh heav­ily on the de­bate over the sys­tem: How well does it have to op­er­ate to be con­sidered “fixed”?

The truth is, the sys­tem is get­ting stronger as it re­cov­ers from its dis­astrous launch, but ex­perts say it still has a long way to go. The prob­lems that con­tin­ue to plague it could con­tin­ue the tor­rent of cri­ti­cism, mak­ing it tough­er for the ad­min­is­tra­tion to re­hab­il­it­ate the im­age of its sig­na­ture law.

“There won’t be a suc­cess un­til the web­site is work­ing,” said Bob Laszewski, a health care con­sult­ant who works closely with in­surers.

Nov. 30 will mark the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s self-im­posed dead­line to have Health­Care.gov work­ing, as well as the end of the second full month of en­roll­ment. And ex­pect­a­tions for both of those mile­stones are mod­est.

In­surers say they’ve seen en­roll­ment pick up in Novem­ber as the ad­min­is­tra­tion made gradu­al im­prove­ments to the site, which serves 36 states. Health­Care.gov pro­cessed a paltry 25,000 sign-ups in Oc­to­ber, but in­surers say the pro­cess has gained steam over the course of this month.

They are con­cerned, however, about linger­ing prob­lems. The site is still send­ing in­cor­rect or in­com­plete in­form­a­tion to in­sur­ance com­pan­ies about the people who choose a plan, and in­dustry of­fi­cials are afraid the ad­min­is­tra­tion is about to flood them with more bad data than they can man­age.

“There’s still a lot of work to do to get the back-end pro­cesses work­ing,” said Robert Zirkel­bach, a spokes­man for Amer­ica’s Health In­sur­ance Plans.

Jeff Zi­ents, the former White House budget dir­ect­or lead­ing the Health­Care.gov re­pair ef­fort, said Fri­day that by Nov. 30, the site will be able to handle 50,000 users at once, the tar­get it was sup­posed to meet when it launched last month.

Zi­ents has also re­peatedly said that is­sues with the in­form­a­tion sent to in­surers were at the top of his “punch list” for site re­pairs. But in­dustry of­fi­cials say those prob­lems haven’t been fully ad­dressed — so the pro­spect of hand­ling 50,000 people at a time is a scary one.

Bob Laszewski, a health care con­sult­ant who works closely with in­surers, es­tim­ated that the site’s back-end er­ror rate is 5 per­cent. It needs to be lower than 1 per­cent for the site to be con­sidered fixed, he said.

“They’ve made some pro­gress on the back end, but it’s still not where it needs to be,” Laszewski said.

Some health policy ex­perts also ques­tion the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s defin­i­tion of suc­cess for the site’s user ex­per­i­ence.

Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials have said they ex­pect the site will work for about 80 per­cent of users by Nov. 30. Yet a 20 per­cent fail­ure rate wouldn’t be con­sidered suc­cess in most in­dus­tries, and it also might not be good enough to stem the tide of neg­at­ive an­ec­dotes about Obama­care en­roll­ment.

“Twenty per­cent still leaves a lot of noise in the sys­tem “¦ that leaves a lot of people with a bad ex­per­i­ence,” said Car­oline Pear­son, vice pres­id­ent at the con­sult­ing firm Avalere Health.

Jonath­an Gruber, a health eco­nom­ist at MIT who helped design the Af­ford­able Care Act, said the prob­lems with an 80 per­cent suc­cess rate could go bey­ond op­tics.

If the ad­min­is­tra­tion means that 80 per­cent of people who want to ac­tu­ally en­roll will be able to, that’s “more than enough,” Gruber said — once you’ve picked a plan, it’s not a big deal to have to call the in­sur­ance com­pany to sign up. But if only 80 per­cent of people are able to use the site to shop for cov­er­age, he said, the ad­min­is­tra­tion will have a prob­lem.

“I think vir­tu­ally every­one who needs to shop on the web­site should be able to,” Gruber said.

Be­cause Health­Care.gov has been un­der re­pair throughout Novem­ber, en­roll­ment will likely still lag well be­hind the pace needed to hit the bot­tom-line goal of sign­ing up 7 mil­lion people by the end of March.

Some state-based in­sur­ance ex­changes have seen their en­roll­ment num­bers surge as they over­came their ini­tial tech­nic­al prob­lems. Cali­for­nia is now sign­ing up 2,700 people per day, up from about 700 in the first week of en­roll­ment. Even be­fore that surge, though, Cali­for­nia had en­rolled more people than all 36 states that rely on Health­Care.gov.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion will re­lease Novem­ber’s en­roll­ment stat­ist­ics in mid-Decem­ber. Ex­perts de­clined to make pre­dic­tions about the num­bers, but in­surers gen­er­ally say they’re see­ing the pace of en­roll­ment pick up mod­estly.

To hit the 7 mil­lion goal, en­roll­ment will need to make up the ground it lost in Oc­to­ber and most of Novem­ber, a chal­lenge that Cali­for­nia’s surge sug­gests is pos­sible — with a func­tion­al web­site.

But be­cause many people — es­pe­cially the young, healthy con­sumers so crit­ic­al to the law’s suc­cess — are ex­pec­ted to sign up later in the six-month en­roll­ment win­dow, Gruber said, Novem­ber’s fig­ures won’t say much about wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion is on track.

“I think they’re pretty use­less un­til close to March,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
14 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
25 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
37 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
51 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
51 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×