For decades, the environmental movement has been relying on scientists, skinny eco-geeks, and unicycle-riding freegans to disseminate their message. No more.
Environmental groups both on and off the Hill are working to change the face of the American football hero from a manly man who eats red, antibiotic-laden meat, drives a gas-guzzling Batmobile, and eschews composting to one who does none of those things.
Representatives from five of America’s major sports leagues hit the Hill on Thursday to discuss the work they’re doing to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions. The National Football League is measuring the greenhouse-gas effects of the Super Bowl this year, and last year it conducted solid-waste management and recycling at all major Super Bowl facilities. Major League Baseball stadiums have adopted solar panels. And the National Basketball Association has come out in support of Environmental Protection Agency standards to reduce carbon pollution from electric power plants.
To have these leagues working with the likes of the Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change is aspirational and somewhat politically loaded. Earlier this year, the NFL abandoned plans to partner with the Health and Human Services Department in promoting health care reform after Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and John Cornyn, R-Texas, contacted professional sports associations advising them not to promote the law.
For now sustainability efforts are more directed at fans than players, the emphasis being on how economically savvy it all is. Given how much Americans look up to athletes, there’s more at stake than the bottom line. “I do know that we have some players who are very interested in this work,” said Craig Harnett, chief financial officer of the National Hockey League, citing Canadian defenseman Andrew Ference and former Rangers goalie Mike Richter.
That matters. While only 13 percent of Americans say they follow science, 61 percent identify as sports fans. “We need a cultural shift in the way people think about their relationship to the climate,” said Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist with the National Resource Defense Council who’s been leading the environmental foray into sports. “Cultural shifts are not led by government.”
What We're Following See More »
Hillary Clinton's transition team has in place strict rules to limit the influence that lobbyists could have "in crafting the nominee’s policy agenda." The move makes it unlikely, at least for now, that Clinton would overturn Obama's executive order limiting the role that lobbyists play in government
Federal employees from 14 agencies have given nearly $2 million in campaign donations in the presidential race thus far, and 95 percent of the donations, totaling $1.9 million, have been to the Clinton campaign. Employees at the State Department, which Clinton lead for four years, has given 99 percent of its donations to the Democratic nominee.
Trying to save control of the Senate, the Senate Leadership Fund, a super PAC with ties to Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, is spending $25 million on six races over the last two weeks of the race. Republicans have been consistently outspent in a majority of the Senate races this cycle. Aside from spending in Nevada, all the spending will come in defense of Republican-held seats.
In an NBC News interview, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said the campaign against ISIS will expand to its headquarters in Raqqa in the "next few weeks." He also reiterated that U.S. forces will not be part of any occupation of territory should it be retaken from ISIS.
Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.