For decades, the environmental movement has been relying on scientists, skinny eco-geeks, and unicycle-riding freegans to disseminate their message. No more.
Environmental groups both on and off the Hill are working to change the face of the American football hero from a manly man who eats red, antibiotic-laden meat, drives a gas-guzzling Batmobile, and eschews composting to one who does none of those things.
Representatives from five of America’s major sports leagues hit the Hill on Thursday to discuss the work they’re doing to reduce their greenhouse-gas emissions. The National Football League is measuring the greenhouse-gas effects of the Super Bowl this year, and last year it conducted solid-waste management and recycling at all major Super Bowl facilities. Major League Baseball stadiums have adopted solar panels. And the National Basketball Association has come out in support of Environmental Protection Agency standards to reduce carbon pollution from electric power plants.
To have these leagues working with the likes of the Bicameral Task Force on Climate Change is aspirational and somewhat politically loaded. Earlier this year, the NFL abandoned plans to partner with the Health and Human Services Department in promoting health care reform after Sens. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and John Cornyn, R-Texas, contacted professional sports associations advising them not to promote the law.
For now sustainability efforts are more directed at fans than players, the emphasis being on how economically savvy it all is. Given how much Americans look up to athletes, there’s more at stake than the bottom line. “I do know that we have some players who are very interested in this work,” said Craig Harnett, chief financial officer of the National Hockey League, citing Canadian defenseman Andrew Ference and former Rangers goalie Mike Richter.
That matters. While only 13 percent of Americans say they follow science, 61 percent identify as sports fans. “We need a cultural shift in the way people think about their relationship to the climate,” said Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist with the National Resource Defense Council who’s been leading the environmental foray into sports. “Cultural shifts are not led by government.”
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."