A Better Obamacare Won’t Save Obama

The website can be fixed, and the Affordable Care Act can start working as intended, but the damage is done — and the president might be, too.

President Obama speaks at a Democratic Party fundraising event in San Francisco, California, on November 25, 2013. 
National Journal
James Oliphant
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
James Oliphant
Nov. 26, 2013, midnight

A new CNN poll con­firms what Amer­ica’s col­lect­ive gut has been say­ing for weeks: Obama­care is sink­ing its name­sake.

The num­bers are ugly: Just one in four re­spond­ents say Pres­id­ent Obama is a com­pet­ent man­ager of the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. For all the hand-wringing about com­par­ing the Health­Care.gov site rol­lout to Hur­ricane Kat­rina, the bot­tom line is that this pres­id­ent, like his pre­de­cessor, has now suffered a sig­na­ture event that has con­vinced a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans that he is un­fit for the job.

Pil­ing on, the pres­id­ent also scored his low­est marks on hon­esty and trust­wor­thi­ness, with 53 per­cent of those sur­veyed re­spond­ing that they don’t feel Obama is be­ing straight with them. To put it in some con­text, Bill Clin­ton was widely viewed as shifty but com­pet­ent, and Jimmy Carter as hon­est but hap­less. Obama at the mo­ment seems to have com­bined the worst of both worlds.

The CNN res­ults amp­li­fy Obama’s polit­ic­al prob­lem: The Af­ford­able Care Act im­broglio is hav­ing an out­sized ef­fect on his en­tire pres­id­ency, with voters re­as­sess­ing his ba­sic qual­i­fic­a­tions. “This is ser­i­ous,” says Chris Kofinis, a Demo­crat­ic strategist and former chief of staff to Sen. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia. “This is much more ser­i­ous than I hear some Demo­crats say­ing pub­licly. This is not a tem­por­ary drop.”

Adds John Geer, an ex­pert on pub­lic opin­ion at Vander­bilt Uni­versity, “In a sense, the pub­lic was col­lect­ively will­ing to be pa­tient. That reser­voir of sup­port among in­de­pend­ents and mod­er­ates has evap­or­ated.”

For weeks, Demo­crats have hewn to the party line, ar­guing that once the web­site woes are re­paired and people can en­roll eas­ily, the polit­ic­al cli­mate will im­prove. And Kofinis is in that lot: “Fix­ing it will help turn it around. But not overnight. It’s a lot easi­er to fall — a lot harder to come back.”

But there are also plenty of reas­ons to be­lieve that Obama won’t re­cov­er to any great de­gree — reas­ons bey­ond his­tory, which has shown that once pres­id­ents tumble to this level, they rarely, if ever, re­turn to their pre­vi­ous heights.

One is the fickle nature of news cov­er­age and the pref­er­ence for an­ec­dote over pat­tern. So if this week’s dead­line comes along and the fed­er­al health care ex­change works smoothly, it’s a one or two-day story, maybe a week. It’s not a sev­en-week story, as the Key­stone Kops-style im­ple­ment­a­tion has been. And if the Nov. 30 dead­line ar­rives and in­dus­tri­ous re­port­ers can doc­u­ment con­sumers still hav­ing troubles with the site, then all the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s talk­ing points about im­prove­ment will be rendered ef­fect­ively in­ert.

But there is a more fun­da­ment­al reas­on why the pres­id­ent is go­ing to have a tough time boun­cing back from this: To most Amer­ic­ans, Obama­care re­mains an ab­strac­tion. The dir­ect be­ne­fits of the law are im­par­ted to a re­l­at­ively tiny part of the pop­u­la­tion. Only 12 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans are ex­pec­ted to use fed­er­al and state in­sur­ance ex­changes to pur­chase cov­er­age — that’s about 4 per­cent of the coun­try. And it’s pos­sible many of them have already re­ceived can­cel­la­tion no­tices along with no­tices of rate hikes, which means their at­ti­tudes to­ward the ACA are, for want of a bet­ter word, com­plex.

At the same time, about 13 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans are ex­pec­ted to be­ne­fit from the ex­pan­sion of the Medi­caid pro­gram. Add those two co­horts to­geth­er and you end up with about 25 mil­lion who re­ceive a dir­ect, sub­stant­ive be­ne­fit from the ACA. That’s less than 10 per­cent of the pop­u­la­tion and com­pared with those who be­ne­fit from Medi­care (49 mil­lion) and So­cial Se­cur­ity (62 mil­lion), or even Medi­care Part D (36 mil­lion), a thin slice of the elect­or­ate. More sig­ni­fic­ant, just about every Amer­ic­an will ul­ti­mately take ad­vant­age of those three en­ti­tle­ments; this is not true for the ACA.

What it all means is that even if the Af­ford­able Care Act works per­fectly from Nov. 30 on(and no one is ser­i­ously ex­pect­ing that), those whose lives are im­proved by the pro­gram rep­res­ent just a re­l­at­ive hand­ful of people, many of whom sit at the lower end of the eco­nom­ic spec­trum and en­gage little with the polit­ic­al pro­cess. As Geer says, “They tend not to vote.”

And that’s what’s go­ing to make any sort of re­newed na­tion­al sales pitch by Obama so dif­fi­cult. Among the polit­ic­ally act­ive, the dam­age is done, and no amount of rebrand­ing or re­selling is go­ing to change their per­cep­tion of the product — nor likely, the pres­id­ent.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
1 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
3 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
5 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
7 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
7 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.