Divestment in Fossil Fuels Pushed in Response to Climate-Change Inaction

Harvard University President Drew Faust.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Nov. 29, 2013, 12:30 a.m.

Reg­u­la­tions to lim­it car­bon emis­sions are a key in­gredi­ent in Pres­id­ent Obama’s second-term cli­mate-change agenda, but en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ists say poli­cy­makers still haven’t gone far enough to com­bat glob­al warm­ing. A grass­roots move­ment has bubbled up in re­sponse to put pres­sure on pub­lic and private in­sti­tu­tions and mu­ni­cip­al gov­ern­ments to end in­vest­ments in fossil fuels.

The past year has seen a groundswell of sup­port for such di­vest­ment. Stu­dent groups and en­vir­on­ment­al act­iv­ists have launched close to 400 cam­paigns call­ing on Amer­ic­an uni­versit­ies and col­leges to with­draw sup­port for fossil fuels by pulling their in­vest­ments in com­pan­ies with large coal, nat­ur­al gas, and pet­ro­leum re­serves.

And polit­ic­al dis­il­lu­sion­ment has been a ma­jor driver of the move­ment. “We have a gov­ern­ment that has been taken over by the fossil-fuel in­dustry, so we’re go­ing to pres­sure the fossil-fuel in­dustry it­self,” Chloe Maxmin, a Har­vard Uni­versity stu­dent in­volved in a cam­paign to per­suade the uni­versity to di­vest from fossil fuels, told The Wash­ing­ton Post.

En­vir­on­ment­al groups have also fo­cused on polit­ic­al in­ac­tion in mak­ing the case for di­vest­ment. “Not only has Con­gress not taken up this is­sue but mem­bers are act­ively work­ing against ef­forts to reg­u­late green­house gases,” Matt Gra­son, one of the founders of DC Di­vest, a cam­paign to en­cour­age the Dis­trict of Columbia to di­vest in fossil fuels, told Na­tion­al Journ­al.

DC Di­vest has made this line of at­tack a cent­ral part of its cam­paign. “If we know we need to stop burn­ing fossil fuels, why don’t we?” the group’s web­site asks. “Be­cause fossil fuel com­pan­ies spend bil­lions to lobby Con­gress to do noth­ing and con­fuse the pub­lic about the ef­fects of their products. And it’s work­ing.”

Some politi­cians are act­ing at the loc­al level, however. In April, Seattle May­or Mike Mc­Ginn led a co­ali­tion of may­ors and city coun­cil mem­bers from nine oth­er cit­ies, in­clud­ing San Fran­cisco; Boulder, Colo.; and Madis­on, Wis., in mak­ing a com­mit­ment to work to­ward fossil-fuel di­vest­ment in their re­spect­ive cit­ies.

Closer to home, mem­bers of the D.C. Coun­cil are also push­ing for di­vest­ment. Coun­cil Chair­man Phil Mendel­son, a Demo­crat, and a num­ber of oth­er coun­cil mem­bers in­tro­duced di­vest­ment le­gis­la­tion in Septem­ber that was sub­ject to a hear­ing this week.

The bill in ques­tion would re­quire the city to pull its hold­ings in the 200 pub­licly traded com­pan­ies with the largest fossil-fuel re­serves from the Dis­trict’s re­tire­ment funds and Health An­nu­ity Trust. If it passes, the meas­ure would be largely sym­bol­ic. But it would send a strong sig­nal that the polit­ic­al will ex­ists to ad­vance the cause, act­iv­ists say.

The road to di­vest­ment is rocky, however.

Oil and gas in­dustry stake­hold­ers have cri­ti­cized the move­ment and fin­an­cial ad­visers have de­bated wheth­er or not di­vest­ment is well-con­sidered fisc­al policy.

Har­vard Pres­id­ent Drew Faust made head­lines this fall when she an­nounced that the uni­versity, which holds the largest en­dow­ment of any U.S. aca­dem­ic in­sti­tu­tion, would not di­vest in fossil-fuel com­pan­ies.

In an open let­ter, Faust ar­gued that uni­versit­ies should steer clear of polit­ic­al en­tan­gle­ments.

“We should … be very wary of steps in­ten­ded to in­stru­ment­al­ize our en­dow­ment in ways that would ap­pear to po­s­i­tion the Uni­versity as a polit­ic­al act­or rather than an aca­dem­ic in­sti­tu­tion,” she com­men­ted.

On the polit­ic­al end of the spec­trum, a de­cision to di­vest in the Dis­trict of Columbia could also face fed­er­al road­b­locks. After the coun­cil passes le­gis­la­tion, Con­gress has a 30-day win­dow dur­ing which time it could pass a joint res­ol­u­tion to over­turn the bill. If the pres­id­ent ap­proved the res­ol­u­tion it would ef­fect­ively deny the bill a chance to be­come law.

Even if this were to hap­pen, however, it would still in­crease vis­ib­il­ity around the is­sue.

“If D.C. were to di­vest I think it would have na­tion­al and even in­ter­na­tion­al im­plic­a­tions,” Gra­son said, adding: “And if Con­gress were to take up the is­sue, it would force a na­tion­al con­ver­sa­tion that would go far bey­ond the na­tion’s cap­it­al.”

What We're Following See More »
CFPB Decision May Reverberate to Other Agencies
54 minutes ago

"A federal appeals court's decision that declared the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau an arm of the White House relies on a novel interpretation of the constitution's separation of powers clause that could have broader effects on how other regulators" like the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Morning Consult Poll: Clinton Decisively Won Debate
1 hours ago

"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."

Twitter Bots Dominated First Debate
2 hours ago

Twitter bots, "automated social media accounts that interact with other users," accounted for a large part of the online discussion during the first presidential debate. Bots made up 22 percent of conversation about Hillary Clinton on the social media platform, and a whopping one third of Twitter conversation about Donald Trump.

Center for Public Integrity to Spin Off Journalism Arm
2 hours ago

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the nonprofit that published the Panama Papers earlier this year, is being spun off from its parent organization, the Center for Public Integrity. According to a statement, "CPI’s Board of Directors has decided that enabling the ICIJ to chart its own course will help both journalistic teams build on the massive impact they have had as one organization."

EPA Didn’t Warn Flint Residents Soon Enough
2 hours ago

According to a new report, the Environmental Protection Agency waited too long before informing the residents of Flint, Mich. that their water was contaminated with lead. Written by the EPA's inspector general, it places blame squarely at the foot of the agency itself, saying it had enough information by June 2015 to issue an emergency order. However, the order wasn't issued until the end of January 2016.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.