Freedom Caucus Raising the Stakes on Budget

House conservatives won’t support defense increases without other cuts, and they warn against passing a “pro forma” budget just to get tax reform.

House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
June 8, 2017, 8 p.m.

The House Free­dom Caucus is close to form­ally up­ping the stakes in 2018 budget ne­go­ti­ations, a move that could com­plic­ate Pres­id­ent Trump’s and Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers’ at­tempts to pass tax re­form and in­crease the de­fense budget.

Free­dom Caucus Chair­man Mark Mead­ows said Wed­nes­day that the group may soon take an of­fi­cial po­s­i­tion that it will not ap­prove in­creases to the de­fense budget un­less Con­gress also votes to lay off 100,000 or more Pentagon staffers and audit the De­part­ment of De­fense.

Fur­ther­more, he said the group is dis­cuss­ing de­mand­ing work re­quire­ments be im­posed on able-bod­ied, single food-stamp re­cip­i­ents in or­der to fin­ance po­ten­tial de­fense in­creases. That would then also have to be paired with a vote to undo the budget se­quester, which man­dates across-the-board cuts to both do­mest­ic and de­fense ac­counts.

“There’s a real will­ing­ness to look at an in­crease in de­fense spend­ing as long as we’re prudent,” Mead­ows said. “We be­lieve that the Pentagon needs to have a 100,000-gov­ern­ment-per­son­nel re­duc­tion. The second part of that is we need to get a real audit.”

Passing a budget this year is para­mount be­cause House Speak­er Paul Ry­an wants to use the budget-re­con­cili­ation pro­cess to pass tax re­form, a move that would al­low Sen­ate lead­ers to avoid a fili­buster and ad­vance their plan without Demo­crat­ic votes. That re­quires adding lan­guage in­to a budget res­ol­u­tion tee­ing up the pro­cess.

Linger­ing dis­agree­ments between Re­pub­lic­an de­fense hawks and fisc­al con­ser­vat­ives, however, have long en­dangered the House’s abil­ity to pass a budget, so there has been a resig­na­tion of late that Re­pub­lic­ans could pass a re­l­at­ively mean­ing­less budget doc­u­ment simply to in­clude in it man­dat­ory in­struc­tions set­ting up the re­con­cili­ation pro­cess.

But the Free­dom Caucus is put­ting ice on that plan, too. Mead­ows said the group sees the budget as a lever­age point this year. Al­though he ac­know­ledged that caucus mem­bers ap­proved a sim­il­ar man­euver earli­er this year to ad­vance their Obama­care re­write, he said the budget num­bers were already locked in by that point. Now, they have a chance to try to cut spend­ing, and they’re tak­ing ad­vant­age.

“Tax re­form and re­con­cili­ation in­struc­tions—if they in­clude what we add, we’re all in. If it doesn’t, then we’re not. We’re not just go­ing to pass a [pro forma] budget,” Mead­ows said. “This time it ac­tu­ally has a dif­fer­ence in terms of our top-level spend­ing.”

Still, some mem­bers have their doubts that the Free­dom Caucus op­pos­i­tion will hold, par­tic­u­larly if Trump en­gages in the pro­cess and de­mands a budget in or­der to be able to pass tax re­form.

“I think they prob­ably would [sup­port a budget] for a tax cut,” said Budget Com­mit­tee mem­ber Tom. Cole. “They’re Re­pub­lic­ans; they like to cut taxes.”

Still, Trump’s level of en­gage­ment on the is­sue is not a giv­en, par­tic­u­larly as his ad­min­is­tra­tion re­mains em­broiled in scan­dal sur­round­ing his as­so­ci­ates’ ties to Rus­sia and ac­cus­a­tions that Trump in­ap­pro­pri­ately tried to in­flu­ence in­vest­ig­at­ors away from pur­su­ing those ties. Fur­ther­more, the ad­min­is­tra­tion and House GOP lead­ers re­main far apart on how to struc­ture tax re­form.

On Fri­day, mem­bers of the Free­dom Caucus will dis­cuss their ideas for tax re­form at the Her­it­age Found­a­tion. The group was also sup­posed to meet with Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Di­ane Black on Wed­nes­day, but the meet­ing was pushed un­til next week.

“The Budget Com­mit­tee’s goal is to re­lease a budget that bal­ances in 10 years and strengthens our mil­it­ary. We are com­mit­ted to that goal, and we’re aim­ing to in­tro­duce our budget in the com­ing weeks,” said Chris Hart­line, a spokes­man for the com­mit­tee.

The Free­dom Caucus’s asks are sig­ni­fic­ant be­cause a budget can­not pass without their votes, due to the fact that no Demo­crats will sup­port a GOP budget that is sure to in­clude deep cuts to do­mest­ic so­cial pro­grams. Re­pub­lic­an de­fense hawks, mean­while, are un­likely to sup­port a budget un­less they get steep in­creases to de­fense spend­ing, and as was proven last year, a budget can­not pass without their votes, either.

Rep. Mike Turn­er, one of those de­fense hawks, said he could sup­port a Pentagon audit, but that across-the-board lay­offs would be out of the ques­tion. That puts the con­fer­ence at a stale­mate, at least for the time be­ing.

Yet even if the con­fer­ence could come to an agree­ment on those is­sues, the ques­tion of how to pay for the de­fense in­creases while also bal­an­cing the budget with­in 10 years looms large over the de­bate and is com­poun­ded by the likely even­tu­al­ity that GOP lead­ers will need Demo­crat­ic sup­port to pass ap­pro­pri­ations bills, an om­ni­bus spend­ing bill, or a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion.

Demo­crats have said they will not agree to large de­fense in­creases at the ex­pense of so­cial-pro­gram fund­ing, and go­ing deep­er in­to do­mest­ic cof­fers to cut money for trans­port­a­tion, health re­search, or the arts would drive even many Re­pub­lic­ans away from sup­port­ing spend­ing bills.

Trump re­mains a wild card, as well, Cole said.

“Both those [groups] have been will­ing to do man­dat­ory sav­ings in the past. The prob­lem is the pres­id­ent of the United States is prob­ably not will­ing to do the kind of sav­ings they’re will­ing to do,” he said. “So people either have to sit down and work through this to get to real­ist­ic num­bers or we’re go­ing to be in a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion, and there’s no de­fense buildup in a CR.”

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login