Veterans Lead Democrats’ Governor Offensive

At least half a dozen are running for the office this cycle.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Ralph Northam at a debate in Richmond, Va., on May 9.
AP Photo/Steve Helber
Zach C. Cohen
Add to Briefcase
Zach C. Cohen
May 29, 2017, 3:45 p.m.

The Demo­crat­ic re­build at the state level may be done on the backs of vet­er­ans of Amer­ica’s re­cent con­flicts abroad.

Just as Re­pub­lic­ans took over the Sen­ate in 2014 with the help of vet­er­ans of the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan, Demo­crats have now lined up at least half a dozen cur­rent and former mem­bers of the mil­it­ary to run for gov­ernor.

Run­ning in states from Maine to Ari­zona, the can­did­ates could strengthen the party’s ef­fort to cut in­to the GOP’s 2-to-1 ad­vant­age in gov­ernor’s man­sions—but they have tough fights ahead in primar­ies, against in­cum­bents, and for open seats the party hasn’t held in years.

“Vet­er­ans aren’t dom­in­ated by one polit­ic­al party or the oth­er,” said Jon Soltz, the chair­man of VoteVets, a group that backs Demo­crat­ic vet­er­ans run­ning for of­fice. “What you’re see­ing is … the heightened amount of Demo­crats that are really up­set over Trump see­ing run­ning for pub­lic of­fice as a source of con­tinu­ing their ser­vice to the coun­try.”

Just one of the nine cur­rent gov­ernors who have served in the mil­it­ary is a Demo­crat. Louisi­ana Gov. John Bel Ed­wards’s back­ground as a ranger and West Point gradu­ate helped him in­tro­duce him­self to con­ser­vat­ive voters statewide in 2015 and bolstered TV ads that said his GOP op­pon­ent, then-Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, “chose pros­ti­tutes over pat­ri­ots.”

Ed­wards met earli­er this year with South Car­o­lina state Rep. James Smith, a Demo­crat con­sid­er­ing a bid next year to un­seat Gov. Henry Mc­Mas­ter, also a vet­er­an. Ed­wards me­dia con­sult­ant Jared Arse­ment said he too met with Smith to dis­cuss us­ing a mil­it­ary re­cord on the cam­paign trail.

“Any vet­er­an who’s look­ing at run­ning for gov­ernor would prob­ably do well to talk to John Bel,” Arse­ment said.

Smith, an act­ive na­tion­al guards­man who trained Afghan forces in Kanda­har, said he won’t make a gubernat­ori­al de­cision un­til the sum­mer, but he em­phas­ized in an in­ter­view that vet­er­ans bring to polit­ics an au­then­ti­city, hu­mil­ity, and “per­spect­ive that is very much in need right now.”

Demo­crats’ ef­forts to elect more vet­er­ans be­gins in next month’s Vir­gin­ia primary, when Lt. Gov. Ral­ph Northam faces off against former Rep. Tom Per­ri­ello. Northam reg­u­larly touts his ex­per­i­ence as an Army neur­o­lo­gist help­ing Gulf War vet­er­ans at Land­stuhl Re­gion­al Med­ic­al Cen­ter in Ger­many.

In an in­ter­view, Northam cited the fact that Vir­gin­ia has one of the largest vet­er­an pop­u­la­tions in the coun­try, but he also ex­pressed con­cern about fed­er­al in­vest­ment in the state’s mil­it­ary as­sets po­ten­tially at the ex­pense of spend­ing on health care and the en­vir­on­ment.

“I’m all about a strong mil­it­ary, hav­ing served in the mil­it­ary,” Northam said. “But we have to be very care­ful. Where’s the money com­ing from?”

VoteVets en­dorsed Northam in Janu­ary, days after Per­ri­ello entered the race. For next year’s races, the group has also already giv­en $2,500 to Con­nie Pil­lich, who is run­ning in the Ohio Demo­crat­ic primary. The group pre­vi­ously sup­por­ted Pil­lich’s 2014 state treas­urer bid and the con­gres­sion­al cam­paigns of Rep. Tim Walz of Min­nesota, a vet­er­an of the Army Na­tion­al Guard who is run­ning to re­place Demo­crat­ic Gov. Mark Dayton.

“When I was faced with the dein­dus­tri­al­iz­a­tion of our town and watch­ing my dad have to re­in­vent him­self in his 50s—and how hard that was on my fam­ily—I knew that I needed an edu­ca­tion,” said Pil­lich, who spent part of her eight years in the Air Force in West Ber­lin dur­ing the Cold War. “And I really liked the idea of wear­ing the uni­form of my coun­try, and I was lucky that I was able to ex­change my edu­ca­tion for my ser­vice.”

Iowa state Rep. Todd Prichard and New­ton, Mas­sachu­setts May­or Setti War­ren echoed sim­il­ar themes in in­ter­views about their de­ploy­ments dur­ing the Ir­aq “surge.” War­ren, who is run­ning for the nom­in­a­tion to chal­lenge Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Charlie Baker, learned as an in­tel­li­gence spe­cial­ist that “we couldn’t af­ford not to work with one an­oth­er,” and he said the same ap­plies to over­com­ing “di­vis­ive polit­ics.”

Prichard, a lieu­ten­ant col­on­el in the Army re­serve who de­ployed to Kuwait, said fel­low vet­er­ans in the state le­gis­lature “tend to be a little bit less par­tis­an,” es­pe­cially on vet­er­ans’ care.

“In Ir­aq, we had an en­emy. They were try­ing to kill us,” Prichard said. “In here, the people on the oth­er side of the aisle, they’re not really an en­emy.”

Former Ok­lahoma At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Drew Ed­mond­son, who fought in Vi­et­nam, is also con­tend­ing for the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion to re­place Gov. Mary Fal­l­in, who can’t seek reelec­tion.

Can­did­ates ar­gued that the skills they de­veloped in the mil­it­ary can be gov­ern­ing cre­den­tials. Ari­zona Demo­crat Dav­id Gar­cia, who hopes to take on Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Doug Ducey next year, said his de­ploy­ments to the Korean Pen­in­sula and ex­per­i­ence fight­ing fires in Yel­low­stone mol­ded his “lead­er­ship style.”

“I don’t walk in a room and tell folks, ‘Hey, when I walk out of here, I’m go­ing to be the guy in charge,’” Gar­cia said. “I walk in—much like an in­fan­try­man—look­ing to see what I can do, what I can con­trib­ute.”

Demo­crat Adam Cote, a dec­or­ated com­pany com­mand­er in Afgh­anistan run­ning for an open seat in Maine, led a pla­toon that built schools and clin­ics in Mo­sul dur­ing one of the dead­li­est years of Op­er­a­tion Ir­aqi Free­dom. He said that as gov­ernor, fix­ing the state’s roads and bridges would be “one of the top pri­or­it­ies.”

“We built in­fra­struc­ture in a war­time zone,” Cote said, “and frankly I can’t wait to do that in Maine, but without get­ting shot at.”

Cor­rec­tion: Northam was a neur­o­lo­gist at Land­stuhl, not a neurosur­geon as ori­gin­ally writ­ten.

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
2 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
2 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login