This Colorado Man Is Ready to Hunt Amazon Drones

But does he have a point?

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
Dec. 3, 2013, midnight

If an Amazon drone were to stumble in­to the air­space above Phil­lip Steel’s yard in Deer Trail, Colo., he knows ex­actly what he’d do: Grab his shot­gun. “I would shoot it down, or­din­ance or no, I would shoot it down,” he tells me over the phone, later adding, “I will shoot it down and go to jail with a smile over my face.”

Deer Trail is one place Amazon prob­ably won’t pi­lot its “Air Prime” drone de­liv­ery sys­tem. The town is poised to vote in the next week and a half on an or­din­ance that will al­low drone hunt­ing, an or­din­ance Steel au­thored.

That is, the meas­ure will al­low cit­izens of Deer Trail to pur­chase $25 drone-hunt­ing li­censes and then bring pieces of shot-down drones back for a bounty of up to $100. The text of the or­din­ance oozes with a not-on-my-lawn dis­dain for the copters. “As such, every un­wanted un­manned aer­i­al vehicle is hereby de­clared a threat to … pre­cious free­dom,” it reads. And, yeah, the kids can get in on the drone shoot­ing too. “There shall be no age re­quire­ment or re­stric­tion for is­su­ance of the hunt­ing li­cense.” No back­ground in­vest­ig­a­tions will be needed to ob­tain a drone hunt­ing li­cense. It’s that es­sen­tial of a right.

Per­haps you’ve heard of this. It’s the kind of stunt that gets no­ticed by the Col­bert Re­port, and that’s kind of the point. Steel’s the type of per­son to make his case to a town coun­cil wear­ing a cow­boy cos­tume and bran­dish­ing a plastic nerf rifle. He says he sent a drone-hunt­ing li­cense to Vladi­mir Putin. He also says he has Ed­ward Snowden’s phone num­ber, but hasn’t called him yet. Last week, he staged a drone-hunt­ing prac­tice ses­sion us­ing mod­el rock­ets in place of UAVs.

“Tech­no­logy ad­vances far quick­er than the law does; as a so­ci­ety we are too eager to em­brace the next new toy.”

He tells me he spent 14 years in the Army as a Psy­cho­lo­gic­al War­fare of­ficer. I asked him what that meant and he summed it up as “pro­pa­ganda.” And he says he’s us­ing that ex­per­i­ence in what he more eu­phemist­ic­ally calls “mar­ket­ing” to get the word out about drones. “I wouldn’t say that I’m a fear mon­ger; I’m try­ing to il­lu­min­ate an im­min­ent threat that is on the ho­ri­zon,” he says. “The per­cep­tion in the ab­sence of fact be­comes real­ity.”

Ba­sic­ally, he’s cre­at­ing a farce to make his cent­ral point: What does the mass pro­lif­er­a­tion of drones mean for pri­vacy? For prop­erty rights? If a drone flies with­in 1,000 feet of a per­son’s air­space, is that a tres­pass? These are the ques­tions the FAA will have to deal with as it makes re­com­mend­a­tions for com­mer­cial drone use. 

FAA chief Mi­chael Huerta out­lined a five-year roadmap last month chart­ing how the agency plans to in­teg­rate com­mer­cial drones in­to na­tion­al air­space, be­gin­ning with the an­nounce­ment of six test site loc­a­tions by the end of the year. A draft rule is ex­pec­ted early next year, but it is only ex­pec­ted to cov­er ap­plic­a­tions for drones that would fly un­der 400 feet above ground and re­main with­in the visu­al line of sight of a pi­lot dur­ing day­time. It’s a far cry from the drones Bezos ima­gines, which would travel up to 10 miles from a dis­tri­bu­tion cen­ter. “You have to pity the poor guy at the FAA,” Peter Sing­er, a seni­or fel­low at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion, says. “I have this im­age of some poor guy at the FAA eat­ing his leftover tur­key sand­wich, watch­ing 60 Minutes and go­ing, ‘oh, crap.’”

“Do I think 1984 is go­ing to hap­pen?” Steel says, down­play­ing the hy­per­bole. “Not in the same sense as George Or­well did — but I think its go­ing to be a lot trick­i­er than that, a lot more subtle.”

And it’s true: Ex­pan­sions of tech­no­logy from re­tail­ers have lim­ited the pri­vacy of con­sumers. There’s that in­fam­ous story of Tar­get know­ing a teen­age girl was preg­nant be­fore her fath­er did. But that’s just the tip of a massive in­dustry that rests on selling con­sumer-be­ha­vi­or pro­files (de­tached from key iden­ti­fi­ers, but still, en­com­passing the shad­ow of a per­son’s buy­ing habits).

“Tech­no­logy ad­vances far quick­er than the law does; as a so­ci­ety we are too eager to em­brace the next new toy,” Steel says. The Su­preme Court every year has such a case — can GPS units track cars without a war­rant, is a DNA data­base search an in­va­sion of pri­vacy, and so on. And while the Deer Trail or­din­ance is a bit of a joke, there are many states that have con­sidered drone pri­vacy laws, to lay the leg­al ground­work be­fore the tech­no­logy be­comes com­mon­place.

Amazon has put forth a tan­tal­iz­ing scen­ario: the skies buzz­ing with in­stant grat­i­fic­a­tion. But that’s bound to have some un­in­ten­ded con­sequences — if it’s even prac­tic­al.

Dustin Volz contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
1 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
2 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login