This Colorado Man Is Ready to Hunt Amazon Drones

But does he have a point?

National Journal
Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Brian Resnick
Dec. 3, 2013, midnight

If an Amazon drone were to stumble in­to the air­space above Phil­lip Steel’s yard in Deer Trail, Colo., he knows ex­actly what he’d do: Grab his shot­gun. “I would shoot it down, or­din­ance or no, I would shoot it down,” he tells me over the phone, later adding, “I will shoot it down and go to jail with a smile over my face.”

Deer Trail is one place Amazon prob­ably won’t pi­lot its “Air Prime” drone de­liv­ery sys­tem. The town is poised to vote in the next week and a half on an or­din­ance that will al­low drone hunt­ing, an or­din­ance Steel au­thored.

That is, the meas­ure will al­low cit­izens of Deer Trail to pur­chase $25 drone-hunt­ing li­censes and then bring pieces of shot-down drones back for a bounty of up to $100. The text of the or­din­ance oozes with a not-on-my-lawn dis­dain for the copters. “As such, every un­wanted un­manned aer­i­al vehicle is hereby de­clared a threat to … pre­cious free­dom,” it reads. And, yeah, the kids can get in on the drone shoot­ing too. “There shall be no age re­quire­ment or re­stric­tion for is­su­ance of the hunt­ing li­cense.” No back­ground in­vest­ig­a­tions will be needed to ob­tain a drone hunt­ing li­cense. It’s that es­sen­tial of a right.

Per­haps you’ve heard of this. It’s the kind of stunt that gets no­ticed by the Col­bert Re­port, and that’s kind of the point. Steel’s the type of per­son to make his case to a town coun­cil wear­ing a cow­boy cos­tume and bran­dish­ing a plastic nerf rifle. He says he sent a drone-hunt­ing li­cense to Vladi­mir Putin. He also says he has Ed­ward Snowden’s phone num­ber, but hasn’t called him yet. Last week, he staged a drone-hunt­ing prac­tice ses­sion us­ing mod­el rock­ets in place of UAVs.

“Tech­no­logy ad­vances far quick­er than the law does; as a so­ci­ety we are too eager to em­brace the next new toy.”

He tells me he spent 14 years in the Army as a Psy­cho­lo­gic­al War­fare of­ficer. I asked him what that meant and he summed it up as “pro­pa­ganda.” And he says he’s us­ing that ex­per­i­ence in what he more eu­phemist­ic­ally calls “mar­ket­ing” to get the word out about drones. “I wouldn’t say that I’m a fear mon­ger; I’m try­ing to il­lu­min­ate an im­min­ent threat that is on the ho­ri­zon,” he says. “The per­cep­tion in the ab­sence of fact be­comes real­ity.”

Ba­sic­ally, he’s cre­at­ing a farce to make his cent­ral point: What does the mass pro­lif­er­a­tion of drones mean for pri­vacy? For prop­erty rights? If a drone flies with­in 1,000 feet of a per­son’s air­space, is that a tres­pass? These are the ques­tions the FAA will have to deal with as it makes re­com­mend­a­tions for com­mer­cial drone use. 

FAA chief Mi­chael Huerta out­lined a five-year roadmap last month chart­ing how the agency plans to in­teg­rate com­mer­cial drones in­to na­tion­al air­space, be­gin­ning with the an­nounce­ment of six test site loc­a­tions by the end of the year. A draft rule is ex­pec­ted early next year, but it is only ex­pec­ted to cov­er ap­plic­a­tions for drones that would fly un­der 400 feet above ground and re­main with­in the visu­al line of sight of a pi­lot dur­ing day­time. It’s a far cry from the drones Bezos ima­gines, which would travel up to 10 miles from a dis­tri­bu­tion cen­ter. “You have to pity the poor guy at the FAA,” Peter Sing­er, a seni­or fel­low at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion, says. “I have this im­age of some poor guy at the FAA eat­ing his leftover tur­key sand­wich, watch­ing 60 Minutes and go­ing, ‘oh, crap.’”

“Do I think 1984 is go­ing to hap­pen?” Steel says, down­play­ing the hy­per­bole. “Not in the same sense as George Or­well did — but I think its go­ing to be a lot trick­i­er than that, a lot more subtle.”

And it’s true: Ex­pan­sions of tech­no­logy from re­tail­ers have lim­ited the pri­vacy of con­sumers. There’s that in­fam­ous story of Tar­get know­ing a teen­age girl was preg­nant be­fore her fath­er did. But that’s just the tip of a massive in­dustry that rests on selling con­sumer-be­ha­vi­or pro­files (de­tached from key iden­ti­fi­ers, but still, en­com­passing the shad­ow of a per­son’s buy­ing habits).

“Tech­no­logy ad­vances far quick­er than the law does; as a so­ci­ety we are too eager to em­brace the next new toy,” Steel says. The Su­preme Court every year has such a case — can GPS units track cars without a war­rant, is a DNA data­base search an in­va­sion of pri­vacy, and so on. And while the Deer Trail or­din­ance is a bit of a joke, there are many states that have con­sidered drone pri­vacy laws, to lay the leg­al ground­work be­fore the tech­no­logy be­comes com­mon­place.

Amazon has put forth a tan­tal­iz­ing scen­ario: the skies buzz­ing with in­stant grat­i­fic­a­tion. But that’s bound to have some un­in­ten­ded con­sequences — if it’s even prac­tic­al.

Dustin Volz contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
INCLUDES WAIVER FOR MATTIS
Congress Releases Stopgap Funding Bill
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Congressional negotiators released a stopgap spending bill Tuesday night to avert a partial government shutdown at midnight Friday and to fund federal agencies and programs through April 28." The 70-page continuing resolution includes $170 million to aid Flint, Michigan's water supply, and a waiver that would allow Ret. Gen. James Mattis to assume the role of secretary of Defense.

Source:
INTERSTATE COMPACT GAINING TRACTION
Democrats Explore Electoral College Changes
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"A number of Capitol Hill Democrats have revived proposals to reform or abolish the Electoral College," chief among Michigan's John Conyers, who "held a panel on Capitol Hill Tuesday to discuss options for eliminating the Electoral College and replacing it with a system where a national popular vote elects the president. ... The plan with the most support to reform the election college at the panel was the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, a proposal first developed in 2001 that would give the national popular vote winner the majority of electoral college votes through an agreement between the states."

Source:
EFFORT LIKELY TO DIE IN COMMITTEE
Jordan Can’t Force a Floor Vote on Impeaching Koskinen
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
House Freedom Caucus Chairman Jim Jordan attempted to force a floor vote on impeaching IRS Commissioner John Koskinen, but "the House voted overwhelmingly to refer it to the Judiciary Committee. ... The committee will not be required to take up the resolution." Earlier, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi "made a motion to table the resolution, which the House voted against by a 180-235 margin, mostly along party lines."
Source:
AFTER THE VOTE FOR SPEAKER
Ryan: No Committee Assignments Until New Year
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

House Speaker Paul Ryan has decreed that House members "won’t receive their committee assignments until January — after they cast a public vote on the House floor for speaker. "The move has sparked behind-the-scenes grumbling from a handful of Ryan critics, who say the delay allows him and the Speaker-aligned Steering Committee to dole out committee assignments based on political loyalty rather than merit or expertise." The roll call to elect the speaker is set for Jan. 3, the first vote of the new Congress.

Source:
EXPECTED TO FUND THE GOVERNMENT THROUGH SPRING
Funding Bill To Be Released Tuesday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters on Monday that the government funding bill will be released on Tuesday. The bill is the last piece of legislation Congress needs to pass before leaving for the year and is expected to fund the government through the spring. The exact time date the bill would fund the government through is unclear, though it is expected to be in April or May.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login